Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact sequences for ordinary differential cohomology

Statement

Assume full AC. For a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold M without boundary and k≥1, let H^k(M;Z) be the degree-k Cheeger–Simons differential characters, let ΩZj(M) denote closed smooth j-forms with integral periods, and let a(η)(z)=∫zη(modZ). For u∈Hk−1(M;R/Z) and a smooth integral (k−1)-cycle z, define i1(u)(z):=⟨u,ι∗[z]⟩∈R/Z, where ι∗:Hk−1∞(M;Z)→Hk−1(M;Z) is induced by inclusion of smooth chains into ordinary singular chains and ⟨u,−⟩ is cohomology-homology evaluation. Then the two natural sequences 0⟶Hk−1(M;R/Z)→i1H^k(M;Z)→RΩZk(M)⟶0 and 0⟶Ωk−1(M)/ΩZk−1(M)→aH^k(M;Z)→IHk(M;Z)⟶0 are exact. In particular, curvature and characteristic class together need not determine a differential character.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, M and k as stated.

[F1]

Cheeger–Simons differential character: a character is a homomorphism on all smooth integral (k−1)-cycles with a unique curvature form and the cochain-extension characteristic class.

[F2]

Differential-character curvature and characteristic class are well-defined: the curvature and characteristic maps are well-defined and natural.

[F3]

Integral-period forms lift to differential characters: every closed integral-period k-form is a curvature.

[F4]

Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology: the coefficient UCT gives the evaluation short exact sequence with its Ext term for integral cohomology.

[F5]

Cohomology with a divisible abelian coefficient group is Hom of homology: for divisible coefficients G, cohomology of a free chain complex identifies with Hom⁡(H∗,G).

[F6]

Smooth integral chains compute singular homology: smooth integral chains compute ordinary integral homology under ACω.

[F7]

The de Rham theorem: under its ACω hypothesis, integration identifies real de Rham cohomology with real singular cohomology; full AC implies that hypothesis.

[F8]

Homology of spheres gives H1(S1;Z)=Z and H2(S1;Z)=0; [F4] gives H2(S1;Z)=0 and [F5] gives H1(S1;R/Z)≅Hom⁡(Z,R/Z)≅R/Z.

[F9]

Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains: integration of an exterior derivative over a smooth singular simplex equals integration of the form over its oriented boundary.

Proof

1.1F1F2F9given

For η∈Ωk−1(M) define a(η)(z)=∫zη(modZ). [F9] gives a(η)(∂c)=∫cdη(modZ), so a(η) is a differential character with curvature dη. The real cochain Int⁡(η) extends a(η) from cycles, and [F9] gives Int⁡(dη)−δInt⁡(η)=0; hence I(a(η))=0. If η−η′ is closed with integral periods then a(η)=a(η′). Conversely, if a(η)=0, then for every smooth integral k-simplex σ, its boundary is a cycle and [F9] gives ∫σdη=∫∂ση∈Z. In a coordinate chart, take oriented affine k-simplices of diameter tending to zero based at any point. Their integrals of dη are integer-valued, vary continuously with the simplex scale, and tend to zero, so they vanish for all sufficiently small scales. Dividing by their k-dimensional volume and taking the limit shows dη vanishes at that point. If k exceeds the chart dimension, dη=0 for degree reasons. Thus dη=0 everywhere; since a(η)=0, all its cycle periods are integral, so η∈ΩZk−1(M). The converse follows directly from the definition of integral periods. Therefore ker⁡a=ΩZk−1(M) and the left map of the second row is injective.

1.2F1F5F6given

If R(h)=0, the defining boundary identity says h(∂c)=0, so h factors through Hk−1∞(M;Z). Since R/Z is divisible, [F5] identifies the corresponding homomorphisms with smooth singular cohomology H∞k−1(M;R/Z); [F6] identifies this with Hk−1(M;R/Z). Conversely each such class defines a flat character. Hence ker⁡R=im⁡i1 and i1 is injective.

1.3F1F4given

The coefficient cochains on the free smooth integral chain groups form a short exact sequence 0→C∗(M;Z)→C∗(M;R)→C∗(M;R/Z)→0: injectivity is coefficient inclusion and AC chooses a real lift on each simplex generator. For a cocycle u with values in R/Z, choose a real cochain lift u~; then δu~ is an integral cocycle. Its class is independent of the lift because any two lifts differ by an integral cochain. If this class is zero, write δu~=δv with v integral; then u~−v is a real cocycle lifting u. Conversely a class lifted from a real cocycle has zero connecting class. This proves that the kernel of the Bockstein Hk−1(M;R/Z)→Hk(M;Z) is the image of real cohomology. For exactness at real cohomology, suppose a real cocycle r reduces to a coboundary modulo integers, say rˉ=δu. Lift u to a real cochain u~; then r−δu~ is an integral cocycle and maps to [r]. In degree zero the same conclusion follows directly because an integer-valued locally constant function is an integral zero-cocycle. Thus the kernel of real reduction is exactly the image of integral cohomology. With the characteristic-class convention I(h)=[Int⁡(R(h))−δh~], a flat class represented by u has I(h)=[−δu~]=−β[u]; the sign does not change its kernel or image.

1.4F1F6F7givenchoose

Let c∈Hk(M;Z) and choose an integral cocycle representative. By [F7], its real image has a closed-form representative ω. Evaluation on smooth cycles shows that ω has integral periods. As the real integration cochain and cR represent the same class, choose a real cochain h~ with δh~=Int⁡(ω)−cR and put h(z)=h~(z)(modZ). Then h(∂b)=∫bω(modZ) and the definition of I gives I(h)=c. Hence I is onto.

2.1F2F3step 1.2

The curvature map lands in ΩZk(M) by [F2]. It is onto by [F3]. Together with step 1.2 this proves exactness of the first row.

2.2F1F2F7step 1.1step 1.3

Let h satisfy I(h)=0. The cochain formula defining I shows that the real singular cohomology class of Int⁡(R(h)) is the realification of I(h), so [F7] gives a form η with dη=R(h). Then h−a(η) is flat and has zero characteristic class. By step 1.3 its flat class is the reduction of a real cohomology class; [F7] represents that class by a closed (k−1)-form θ. Thus h=a(η)+a(θ)=a(η+θ), proving ker⁡I⊆im⁡a. The reverse inclusion is step 1.3 and the form-action calculation in step 1.1.

3.1F1F4F5F6F8step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

On M=S1 and k=2, [F8] gives a nonzero flat class in H1(S1;R/Z). By the first exact sequence already proved in steps 1.2 and 2.1 it gives a nonzero character with R=0. Its characteristic class lies in H2(S1;Z)=0 by [F8], so it has the same (I,R) pair as the zero character. This proves that the two maps need not determine a character.

Remarks

The two invariants (I,R) do not determine a character pointwise. On the oriented circle, the characters hθ(z)=θ[z] for θ∈R/Z all have I=R=0 and have distinct holonomy on the positive fundamental cycle; the full calculation is on gts-differential-cohomology-deligne-gerbes-examples. The second exact sequence is not a uniqueness assertion.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources