Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integral-period forms lift to differential characters

Statement

Assume full AC. Let M be a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold without boundary, let k≥1, and let ω∈Ωk(M) be closed with integral periods on all smooth integral k-cycles. Then there is a degree-k differential character h with curvature ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, M, k≥1, and a closed k-form ω with integral periods.

[F1]

Smooth integral singular chain complex gives the free smooth integral chain complex and its homology.

[F2]

Smooth integral chains compute singular homology identifies its homology with ordinary singular homology.

[F3]

Singular UCT extension from cycle projections gives the evaluation short exact sequence for cohomology of a free integral chain complex under AC.

[F4]

Cohomology with a divisible abelian coefficient group is Hom of homology identifies real-coefficient cohomology with homomorphisms from homology because R is divisible.

[F5]

Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains gives ∫cdη=∫∂cη for finite real smooth chains. Restriction along integer coefficients gives the same identity for the integral chains used here.

Proof

1.1F1F5given

Integration of ω defines a real cochain w(c)=∫cω. [F5] gives δw(c)=w(∂c)=∫cdω=0, so w is a cocycle. By the integral-period hypothesis, evaluation of [w] on Hk∞(M;Z) has values in Z; denote this homomorphism by λ.

2.1F1F3step 1.1choose

Apply [F3] to the free complex C∗∞(M;Z) and coefficient group Z. Its evaluation map onto Hom⁡(Hk∞(M;Z),Z) is surjective, so choose an integral cocycle c whose evaluation equals λ.

3.1F2F4step 2.1

Under coefficient inclusion Z↪R, c and w have the same evaluation on Hk∞(M;Z). By [F4], evaluation is injective for real coefficients, so [w−cR]=0. Hence there is a real cochain h~∈C∞k−1(M;R):=Hom⁡Z(Ck−1∞(M;Z),R) with δh~=w−cR.

4.1F1step 3.1∎

Define h(z)=h~(z)(modZ) for z∈Zk−1∞(M;Z). For every smooth integral k-chain b, h(∂b)=δh~(b)(modZ)=w(b)−c(b)(modZ)=∫bω(modZ), because c(b) is integral. Thus h is a differential character with curvature ω. The construction uses a choice of cocycle and primitive, but the statement asserts existence only.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources