Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Semistable degeneration and limit mixed Hodge structure data

Definition

Let Δ be a complex disk with coordinate t and Δ∗=Δ∖{0}. A semistable degeneration datum consists of a proper holomorphic map πˉ:Xˉ→Δ with smooth total space, smooth over Δ∗, whose central fibre D=πˉ−1(0) is a reduced simple-normal-crossing divisor; in the algebraic/projective case require πˉ projective. Put X∗:=Xˉ∖D and define π:=πˉ∣X∗:X∗→Δ∗. The associated local system is VZ=Rkπ∗Z/tors, with monodromy T around a positively oriented loop. If after an explicitly specified finite base change the monodromy is unipotent, define N=log⁡T=(T−I)−12(T−I)2+13(T−I)3−⋯ , which is a finite sum because T−I is nilpotent.

The relative logarithmic de Rham complex is ΩXˉ/Δ∙(log⁡D):=ΩXˉ∙(log⁡D)/(πˉ∗ΩΔ1(log⁡0)∧ΩXˉ∙−1(log⁡D)). After the specified base change, use the flat-marking convention Φ(z+1)=TΦ(z) with t=e2πiz. The canonical logarithmic extension is the holomorphic bundle on Δ whose frame on the universal cover is ezNe1,…,ezNem for a flat basis e1,…,em; its connection has logarithmic matrix N dt/(2πit) in this frame. If the untwisted filtration e−zNΦ(z) extends holomorphically across t=0 by subbundles of this extension, call those subbundles the extended Hodge filtration and denote their fibre at 0 by F∞. Their extension is recorded only when it exists; this definition does not assert it.

For a finite-dimensional rational vector space carrying the nilpotent N=log⁡T, let W(N) denote the unique finite increasing filtration satisfying NWj⊆Wj−2 and such that the induced Nℓ:Gr⁡ℓW(N)→Gr⁡−ℓW(N) is an isomorphism for every ℓ≥0. It is centred at zero; set W(N)[−k]j:=W(N)j−k, centred at k. A candidate limit mixed-Hodge structure consists of this shifted filtration and an extended limiting Hodge filtration when the latter exists. This definition asserts neither their existence for every degeneration nor a semistable-reduction theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The disk and family data in the Definition; and the supplied polarized variation of Hodge structure on the smooth locus.

[F1]

A polarized variation consists of the integral/rational local system, flat bundle, filtration, polarization and transversality data defined in Polarized variation of Hodge structure and period map.

[F2]

A rational mixed Hodge structure is an increasing weight filtration and a decreasing Hodge filtration whose induced filtrations are opposed on each weight-graded piece (Rational mixed Hodge structures).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

In local coordinates for a reduced SNC divisor, D is given by z1⋯zr=0 and logarithmic one-forms are generated by dzi/zi for i≤r and dzj for the remaining coordinates. Their exterior differential is again logarithmic, and dlog⁡t pulls back to a logarithmic one-form; therefore the displayed quotient is a well-defined cochain complex.

2.1F2givenalgebra∎

If T=I+U with Um=0, every term of the logarithm series of degree at least m vanishes, so N is a finite polynomial in T−I. The candidate filtrations are only named data; their existence as a limit MHS remains the later theorem's obligation.

Remarks

A proper algebraic family with reduced SNC central fibre is a geometric specialization with its own hypotheses. For a general polarized analytic variation, quasi-unipotence and the passage to unipotent monodromy must be proved separately; the word “degeneration” does not imply either conclusion.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources