Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational mixed Hodge structures

Definition

A rational mixed Hodge structure consists of a Q-vector space H with a finite basis (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis) together with

such that the following opposition condition holds on every weight-graded piece. Here a filtration is finite when WaH=0 for all sufficiently negative a and WaH=H for all sufficiently positive a, and dually FaHC=HC for a≪0 and FaHC=0 for a≫0 (Increasing and decreasing filtration of an object).

Complexification and conjugation. Complex scalars act by c(h⊗z)=h⊗cz; this respects the rational balancing relations. A finite rational basis of H identifies HC with the corresponding finite-dimensional coordinate space over C. The Q-linear involution σ of HC, defined on generators by σ(h⊗z)=h⊗zˉ and extended Q-linearly, satisfies σ2=id and σ(cz)=cˉ σ(z) for c∈C (The complex numbers as R[x]/(x2+1), with the real embedding and imaginary unit i). It preserves the subspace WaHC:=(WaH)⊗QC for every a, so it descends to each graded piece Gr⁡aWHC:=WaHC/Wa−1HC (Associated graded object of a filtered object). The conjugate Hodge filtration is Fˉq:=σ(Fq), a finite decreasing filtration of HC.

Opposition. Let V be a finite-dimensional C-vector space with finite decreasing filtrations F and Fˉ, and let n be an integer. The two filtrations are n-opposed when the natural map ⨁p+q=n(FpV∩FˉqV)⟶V,(vp,q)p+q=n⟼∑p+q=nvp,q, is an isomorphism. Applied to V=Gr⁡nWHC this condition is required for every n, with the induced filtrations: Fp acts on Gr⁡nWHC through the image of Fp∩WnHC, and Fˉq through the image of Fˉq∩WnHC. Writing Hnp,q:=FpGr⁡nWHC∩FˉqGr⁡nWHC, the requirement is therefore the direct sum decomposition Gr⁡nWHC=⨁p+q=nHnp,qfor every n∈Z. Since σ interchanges the induced filtrations Fp and Fˉp and preserves W, it maps Hnp,q onto Hnq,p, so Hnp,q‾=Hnq,p. Equivalently, the opposition condition requires both FpV∩FˉqV=0 whenever p+q>n and FpV+Fˉn+1−pV=V for every p, on V=Gr⁡nWHC. The conjunction, rather than either condition alone, is equivalent to the displayed decomposition: the spanning condition and the modular law give FpV=Fp+1V+(FpV∩Fˉn−pV), and the vanishing condition makes this sum direct; descending induction through the finite filtration gives FpV=⨁a≥p(FaV∩Fˉn−aV) and then the decomposition of V. Conversely, the decomposition gives these two conditions by grouping its summands by the first and second indices.

Morphisms. A morphism f ⁣:H→K of rational mixed Hodge structures is a Q-linear map with f(WaH)⊆WaK for all a and fC(FpHC)⊆FpKC for all p, where fC=f⊗id. Such an f commutes with the conjugations σ, hence also satisfies fC(FˉpHC)⊆FˉpKC.

Substructures, pure structures, Tate. A subspace H′⊆H with the induced filtrations WaH′=H′∩WaH and FpHC′=HC′∩FpHC is a substructure when the induced filtrations again satisfy the opposition condition on every graded piece, and a quotient H→Q with the quotient filtrations is a quotient structure under the same requirement; that the kernel, image and cokernel of a morphism do carry such structures is not part of the definition and is proved in the strictness lemma below. A structure is pure of weight n when Wn−1H=0 and WnH=H; the opposition condition then says that HC=⨁p+q=nHp,q with Hp,q=Fp∩Fˉq, and Hp,q‾=Hq,p. The Tate structure Q(r), for r∈Z, is the pure structure of weight −2r with Q(r)C=C concentrated in type (−r,−r), that is H−r,−r=C and Hp,q=0 for (p,q)≠(−r,−r).

Tensor and dual conventions. The tensor product H⊗K carries Wa(H⊗K)=∑b+c=aWbH⊗WcK,Fp(H⊗K)C=∑b+c=pFbHC⊗FcKC, where the weight sum is taken over Q and the Hodge sum over C, using (H⊗QK)C≅HC⊗CKC; the dual H∗=Hom⁡Q(H,Q) carries WaH∗={u:u(W−a−1H)=0},FpHC∗={u:u(F1−pHC)=0}.

Polarizability. A pure rational Hodge structure H of weight n is polarizable when it carries a rational bilinear form Q of parity (−1)n that pairs only complementary Hodge types, i.e. Q(Hp,q,Hp′,q′)=0 unless p′=n−p and q′=n−q, and whose Weil-operator Hermitian form h(u,v):=Q(Cu,vˉ), where the Weil operator C acts as ip−q on Hp,q, is positive definite.

No mixed structure in this definition is assumed to split over R or over Q; the Deligne splitting constructed below is a decomposition over C only.

Source notes

Deligne II (2.3.1)-(2.3.4) is the primary source; Voisin, Definition 1.22 and Definition 2.6 and Weber, (2.1.5) and (2.2.1) state the same datum in lattice and in vector-space form. The polarizability clause records the Hodge-Riemann convention of Deligne II (2.1.15)-(2.1.16); it is a convention about which structures may be called polarizable and asserts no existence theorem. The forward mentions of the strictness lemma and of the splitting lemma refer to the two consequences proved later on this page; they are explanatory and create no dependency.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources