How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational mixed Hodge structures
Definition
A rational mixed Hodge structure consists of a -vector space with a finite basis (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis) together with
- a finite increasing filtration of , the weight filtration, and
- a finite decreasing filtration of , the Hodge filtration (The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums),
such that the following opposition condition holds on every weight-graded piece. Here a filtration is finite when for all sufficiently negative and for all sufficiently positive , and dually for and for (Increasing and decreasing filtration of an object).
Complexification and conjugation. Complex scalars act by ; this respects the rational balancing relations. A finite rational basis of identifies with the corresponding finite-dimensional coordinate space over . The -linear involution of , defined on generators by and extended -linearly, satisfies and for (The complex numbers as , with the real embedding and imaginary unit ). It preserves the subspace for every , so it descends to each graded piece (Associated graded object of a filtered object). The conjugate Hodge filtration is , a finite decreasing filtration of .
Opposition. Let be a finite-dimensional -vector space with finite decreasing filtrations and , and let be an integer. The two filtrations are -opposed when the natural map is an isomorphism. Applied to this condition is required for every , with the induced filtrations: acts on through the image of , and through the image of . Writing the requirement is therefore the direct sum decomposition Since interchanges the induced filtrations and and preserves , it maps onto , so . Equivalently, the opposition condition requires both whenever and for every , on . The conjunction, rather than either condition alone, is equivalent to the displayed decomposition: the spanning condition and the modular law give , and the vanishing condition makes this sum direct; descending induction through the finite filtration gives and then the decomposition of . Conversely, the decomposition gives these two conditions by grouping its summands by the first and second indices.
Morphisms. A morphism of rational mixed Hodge structures is a -linear map with for all and for all , where . Such an commutes with the conjugations , hence also satisfies .
Substructures, pure structures, Tate. A subspace with the induced filtrations and is a substructure when the induced filtrations again satisfy the opposition condition on every graded piece, and a quotient with the quotient filtrations is a quotient structure under the same requirement; that the kernel, image and cokernel of a morphism do carry such structures is not part of the definition and is proved in the strictness lemma below. A structure is pure of weight when and ; the opposition condition then says that with , and . The Tate structure , for , is the pure structure of weight with concentrated in type , that is and for .
Tensor and dual conventions. The tensor product carries where the weight sum is taken over and the Hodge sum over , using ; the dual carries
Polarizability. A pure rational Hodge structure of weight is polarizable when it carries a rational bilinear form of parity that pairs only complementary Hodge types, i.e. unless and , and whose Weil-operator Hermitian form , where the Weil operator acts as on , is positive definite.
No mixed structure in this definition is assumed to split over or over ; the Deligne splitting constructed below is a decomposition over only.
Source notes
Deligne II (2.3.1)-(2.3.4) is the primary source; Voisin, Definition 1.22 and Definition 2.6 and Weber, (2.1.5) and (2.2.1) state the same datum in lattice and in vector-space form. The polarizability clause records the Hodge-Riemann convention of Deligne II (2.1.15)-(2.1.16); it is a convention about which structures may be called polarizable and asserts no existence theorem. The forward mentions of the strictness lemma and of the splitting lemma refer to the two consequences proved later on this page; they are explanatory and create no dependency.
Depends on
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- Increasing and decreasing filtration of an object
- Associated graded object of a filtered object
- Internal direct sum $V = \bigoplus_{i<n} U_i$: the sum is everything and each summand meets the sum of the others only in $0_V$
- Modules over a ring form an abelian category
- The complex numbers as $\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$, with the real embedding and imaginary unit $i$
- The tensor product $M\otimes_R N$ from the additive group underlying the free $\mathbb Z$-module on $M\times N$, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums
Used by
- Cohomological mixed Hodge complexes Definition
- Geometric polarizable Hodge variations on algebraic bases Definition
- A mixed Hodge extension without a rational splitting Example
- A proper singular curve with weight-zero cohomology Example
- The punctured line has a weight-two logarithmic class Example
- Strictness of mixed Hodge morphisms Lemma
- The Deligne splitting of a mixed Hodge structure Lemma
- Logarithmic construction of smooth-open mixed Hodge structures Theorem
- Proper cohomology and functorial mixed Hodge weights Theorem
- The fixed part of a geometric Hodge variation Theorem
- Weights control restriction images into proper varieties Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Deligne, Theorie de Hodge II, Publ. Math. IHES 40 (1971) 5-57 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Claire Voisin, Hodge structures and the topology of algebraic varieties, author-hosted lecture notes (Harvard CMSA revision) (standard reference, not scraped)
- F. El Zein, Hodge Structures and Mixed Hodge Structures, University of Pennsylvania course notes (June 24, 2010) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrzej Weber, Notes on Mixed Hodge Structures, Srni January 2005 (author-hosted, 15 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)