How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Geometric polarizable Hodge variations on algebraic bases
Definition
Let be a connected smooth quasiprojective complex variety. A geometric polarizable rational Hodge variation on consists of a finite-rank rational local system (Local systems and pullback), a continuous pure Hodge decomposition of its fibers, or a finite direct sum of pure weights, in the sense of Rational mixed Hodge structures, and an algebraic realization on a nonempty Zariski open : there are smooth projective morphisms , degrees and integers such that is a Hodge direct summand of where is the Tate structure of Rational mixed Hodge structures. A Hodge direct summand means the image of a flat rational idempotent that is a Hodge morphism at every point.
A morphism of variations is a flat rational map that is a Hodge morphism at every point. A polarization of a pure object is a flat rational bilinear form with the Hodge positivity property on every fiber; it is not postulated for arbitrary local subsystems: a geometric realization carries one by relative ampleness, and Hodge direct summands inherit it.
The closures recorded here under finite sums, tensor products, Hodge direct summands and Tate twists, the exterior-power realizability, the duals via the polarization, and the full monodromy-stable integral lattices are proved by the family construction later on this page (Geometric Gauss-Manin Hodge variations and integral lattices ↗); that forward mention is explanatory and is not a prerequisite of the definition. The algebraic-open fundamental-group assertion and the Gauss-Manin construction remain separate proof suppliers, and no claim is made for arbitrary analytic variations on a punctured disk. No choice principle is needed: the definition quantifies over finite data.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Deligne, Theorie de Hodge II, Publ. Math. IHES 40 (1971) 5-57; SS4.2.1-4.2.5, printed pp. 43-45 (continuous families of Q-Hodge structures, polarizations, the algebraic category) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Claire Voisin, Hodge structures and the topology of algebraic varieties, author-hosted lecture notes (Harvard CMSA revision); SS3.2, printed pp. 38-41 (the local systems attached to smooth projective families) (standard reference, not scraped)