How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The fixed part of a geometric Hodge variation
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a geometric polarizable rational Hodge variation (Geometric polarizable Hodge variations on algebraic bases) on a connected smooth quasiprojective complex variety . For each base point , the monodromy-invariant space (Local systems and pullback) is a Hodge substructure of (Rational mixed Hodge structures), and parallel transport identifies these spaces as one constant Hodge structure. Equivalently, the Hodge components of every global flat section are global flat sections. For with smooth projective and an SNC smooth projective compactification of , the image of is exactly the invariant space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a connected smooth quasiprojective complex variety , a geometric polarizable rational Hodge variation on in the sense of Geometric polarizable Hodge variations on algebraic bases, and points joined by a path, so that the monodromy representations at the two points are conjugate by the transport isomorphism (Local systems and pullback).
Smooth projective families give finite-rank local systems with full monodromy-stable integral lattices, continuous pure Hodge decompositions, flat Lefschetz operators from a relatively ample bundle, a flat rational polarization, the closure properties under finite sums, tensor products, Tate twists, exterior powers and Hodge direct summands, and pullbacks of algebraic maps between smooth projective fibres preserve rational Hodge structures (Geometric Gauss-Manin Hodge variations and integral lattices).
Centered hard-Lefschetz isomorphisms split a bounded t-complex into the shifted direct sum of its t-cohomology objects (Hard Lefschetz splits a bounded t-structure complex); fibrewise hard Lefschetz for the class of a relatively ample bundle is supplied by the Kähler identities (Kähler identities give Lefschetz sl-two and hard Lefschetz).
For a smooth quasiprojective with an SNC smooth projective compactification , the logarithmic complex gives a functorial rational mixed Hodge structure on whose weights are at least and whose minimal weight part is , independent of the compactification (Logarithmic construction of smooth-open mixed Hodge structures); the existence of SNC compactifications and of a common dominating model is SNC projective compactifications of smooth quasiprojective varieties.
Morphisms of rational mixed Hodge structures are strict for and , and a morphism from weights at least to weights at most has pure image of weight (Strictness of mixed Hodge morphisms).
A nonempty Zariski open subset of a connected smooth complex algebraic variety is path connected and its inclusion induces a surjection on fundamental groups (Algebraic open inclusions surject on fundamental groups).
Proper base change identifies the cohomology sheaf of a smooth projective family with the fibre cohomology, and the Leray identification holds in the bounded constructible calculus of Coherent six operations on analytic constructible field sheaves.
Proof
Leray edge map in the family case. Let be smooth projective and put . By [F3] choose an SNC smooth projective compactification of . Work first on the open-and-closed part where the smooth morphism has relative dimension ; there are finitely many such parts, and their derived images sum to . Each restriction remains smooth projective. The relatively ample Chern class is a morphism : an injective resolution identifies degree-two cohomology with morphisms from the constant sheaf to its shift. Push it forward in [F6] and shift by to obtain for , whose stalk action is the cup-product Lefschetz action of [F1]. Now and , and between these sheaves is an isomorphism by fibrewise rational hard Lefschetz and proper base change [F2, F6]. Thus the centered hypothesis of [F2] applies to , and shifting back and summing over gives . Precompose this isomorphism with the inverses of its induced automorphisms on the summands so that it induces the identity on every cohomology sheaf. Under the Leray identification supplied by [F6], this decomposition expresses as the direct sum of the groups ; the summand is a right inverse to the canonical edge map , since the normalized summand inclusion induces the identity on ; hence the edge map is surjective. Equivalently the normalized decomposition makes that edge map the projection onto this summand. The stalk of at is by proper base change [F6], and evaluation at from the global flat sections is injective because is connected; its image is exactly the monodromy-invariant subspace . Consequently the composite has image the invariant subspace.
Weights and strictness identify the invariant subspace. The space carries the mixed Hodge structure of [F3], whose weights are at least ; the target is pure of weight , because is a smooth projective variety and the restriction is a morphism of mixed Hodge structures by the smooth-open functoriality of [F3], applied to the algebraic fibre inclusion; the compact fibre structure agrees with its pure structure because its boundary is empty. Strictness [F4] applied to this morphism, whose target has and , gives that the image of equals the image of its minimal weight part ; by [F3] that minimal weight part is the image of . Combining with step 1.1, the image of equals the image of , which is the monodromy-invariant subspace. Since and are pure of weight and the restriction is a Hodge morphism by [F1], its image is a Hodge substructure; this proves that the invariant subspace is a Hodge substructure in the family case.
Base-point independence and flatness of Hodge components in the family case. The restriction factors through the canonical map followed by evaluation at , and is independent of . Its kernel is therefore one fixed rational subspace, and evaluation identifies with the quotient , carrying the quotient Hodge structure, at every base point simultaneously; this is the asserted one constant Hodge structure on the invariant spaces. Now let be a global flat section of . Since the invariant space at is a Hodge substructure by step 2.1, the Hodge components of the value lie again in the complexified invariant space, hence are values of global flat sections ; their sum is a global flat section with the same value at as , so it equals by connectedness. Since the Hodge decomposition of the invariant fibre is the fixed quotient structure of step 2.1, the section is the Hodge component of of the corresponding type at every fibre. This proves, in the family case, both that the invariant subspace is a Hodge substructure and that the Hodge components of global flat sections are global flat sections.
Reduction of a general geometric variation to the realization open. Let be a nonempty Zariski open on which has an algebraic realization: is the image of a flat rational idempotent that is a Hodge morphism at every point, inside for smooth projective ; this is the definition of a geometric variation, and each summand is a finite direct sum of weight pieces. By steps 1.1-3.1 applied to each over (note is again connected smooth quasiprojective), the statement holds for every : its invariant part is a constant Hodge substructure and the Hodge components of its global flat sections are flat. Finite direct sums and Tate twists preserve both assertions, because monodromy acts componentwise and the twist changes only the weight; hence the statement holds for . Because is flat and a Hodge morphism, it commutes with monodromy and with the Hodge decompositions, so the invariant space of is the image under of the invariant space of , and it inherits the constant Hodge structure; the Hodge components of a flat section of are the images under of the components of a lift and are therefore flat. This proves the assertions for .
Extension from to . The inclusion induces a surjection by [F5]. Therefore a vector of fixed by is fixed by , so restriction of flat sections is an isomorphism: it is injective because is connected, and surjective by the preceding sentence. Apply this restriction isomorphism also after complexification. Given a global flat section of , its restriction to has, by step 4.1, Hodge components that are flat sections of ; each extends uniquely to a global flat section of , and is a global complex flat section vanishing on the dense open , hence vanishes by continuity. For each type , the corresponding takes its values in the continuous Hodge subbundle of that type on . Membership in this subbundle is a closed condition: in a local trivialization its continuously varying projection has kernel describing the complement, and the difference between and its type projection is continuous. This difference vanishes on the dense open , hence on all of . Thus has the prescribed type everywhere; uniqueness of the fiber decomposition makes these global flat sections exactly the Hodge components of . In particular the complexification of , consisting of values of global complex flat sections, is stable under all Hodge type projections. The rational invariant space is therefore a Hodge substructure with the induced pure decomposition.
Independence of the base point for a general variation. Evaluation identifies the rational space with each invariant fiber . Transport along a path identifies these invariant fibers through this one space , since a global flat section is transported to its own value. Step 5.1 proves that the Hodge components of every global flat section are again global flat sections. On the realization open , steps 3.1 and 4.1 identify these type decompositions with one fixed quotient Hodge structure on , and the closed-membership argument of step 5.1 extends those same types to every point of . Consequently evaluation gives one Hodge structure on independent of , and transport restricted to the invariant fibers preserves that structure. This assertion concerns the invariant constant subsystem; it does not assume that transport on the full variation preserves the moving Hodge decomposition. Finite sums of pure weights are handled one weight at a time, proving every clause of the statement.
Remarks
The proof uses the typed family, algebraic-open, logarithmic-weight and ordinary splitting suppliers. Its invariant-type continuity argument does not assume Hodge-compatible transport on the whole variation. The compactification image and its Hodge structure are supplied by the full logarithmic construction; no theorem for arbitrary analytic variations on a punctured disk is used.
Depends on
- Geometric polarizable Hodge variations on algebraic bases
- Local systems and pullback
- Rational mixed Hodge structures
- Logarithmic construction of smooth-open mixed Hodge structures
- SNC projective compactifications of smooth quasiprojective varieties
- Hard Lefschetz splits a bounded t-structure complex
- Kähler identities give Lefschetz sl-two and hard Lefschetz
- Algebraic open inclusions surject on fundamental groups
- Geometric Gauss-Manin Hodge variations and integral lattices
- Strictness of mixed Hodge morphisms
- Coherent six operations on analytic constructible field sheaves
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
178 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Deligne, Theorie de Hodge II, Publ. Math. IHES 40 (1971) 5-57; Theoreme 4.1.1(i)-(ii) and Corollaire 4.1.2, printed pp. 40-42 (Leray degeneration and the largest constant subsystem) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Claire Voisin, Hodge structures and the topology of algebraic varieties, author-hosted lecture notes (Harvard CMSA revision); Theorems 3.1-3.3 and Corollaries 3.4-3.5, printed pp. 36-41 (degeneration, the global invariant cycle theorem, and Hodge substructure of the invariant part) (standard reference, not scraped)