Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Left and right regular representations on L2(G)

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be a compact Lie group with normalized Haar measure dg, and let L2(G)=L2(G,C) be the complex Hilbert space of square-integrable classes with inner product ⟨f,h⟩=∫Gf(g)h(g)‾ dg (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

  • The left regular representation is (Lxf)(y):=f(x−1y),x,y∈G,
  • the right regular representation is (Rxf)(y):=f(yx),x,y∈G.

Both are well defined on classes: right translation of the argument by x and left translation by x−1 are measure-preserving homeomorphisms of G, so they preserve null sets and integrability. Each Lx and Rx is a linear isometry and a unitary operator of L2(G), because invariance of dg under translations gives ∥Lxf∥22=∫G∣f(x−1y)∣2 dy=∫G∣f(y)∣2 dy=∥f∥22, and likewise for Rx. The assignments x↦Lx and x↦Rx are group homomorphisms G→U(L2(G)): LxLx′=Lxx′ and RxRx′=Rxx′, and they commute with each other, LxRx′=Rx′Lx, factorising the two-sided action (x,x′)↦LxRx′ of G×G on L2(G).

Both homomorphisms are strongly continuous. Indeed, let f∈L2(G) and ε>0. Since normalized Haar measure is Radon and G is compact, C_c(X) is dense in L^p(mu) for a Radon measure gives c∈C(G) with ∥f−c∥2<ε. Translation is isometric, so ∥Lxf−f∥2≤2ε+∥Lxc−c∥2. Uniform continuity of c on compact G makes the last term tend to 0 as x→e; the same argument gives ∥Rxf−f∥2→0. Continuity at an arbitrary group element follows from the homomorphism law and the isometry of the translations.

These are the infinite-dimensional Hilbert-space representations of G referred to in the definition of a representation (Continuous and unitary representations); their decomposition is proved later on this page.

Remarks

  • The two-sided action is unitary for the same inner product and makes L2(G) a unitary G×G-module, which is how matrix-coefficient spaces of finite-dimensional representations embed into L2(G).
  • The conventions are fixed so that the left action is by (Lxf)(y)=f(x−1y) and the right action by (Rxf)(y)=f(yx); the convolution convention below is the corresponding right convolution.
  • Below, L2(G) always carries the complex inner product and the normalized Haar measure; the linear functional f↦∫Gf dg is denoted by the same symbol as the pairing.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources