Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix complex scalars. Let I⊆R be a nonempty open interval, bounded or unbounded, and write L2(I;C) for the complex Hilbert space of Lebesgue (equivalence classes of) square-integrable functions with the inner product ⟨u,v⟩=∫Iuv‾ linear in the first argument (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

First-order space. Define H1(I):={u∈L2(I;C): the weak derivative Du of the class u exists and Du∈L2(I;C)}, where Du is the weak derivative of Weak derivative of a locally integrable function: a class Du∈Lloc1(I;C) with ∫Iu φ′=(−1)∫I(Du)φfor every φ∈Cc∞(I), an identity that is choice-free (Locally integrable functions as regular distributions). Equip H1(I) with the sesquilinear form ⟨u,v⟩H1:=∫Iuv‾+∫I(Du)Dv‾, whose associated norm is ∥u∥H1=(∥u∥L22+∥Du∥L22)1/2; the symbol u′ denotes the same weak derivative Du throughout the page.

Second-order space. Define H2(I):={u∈H1(I):Du∈H1(I)}, and for u∈H2(I) write D2u:=D(Du)∈L2(I;C); the norm is ∥u∥H2=(∥u∥L22+∥Du∥L22+∥D2u∥L22)1/2. Thus H2(I) consists exactly of the classes in L2(I) whose first and second weak derivatives exist and lie in L2(I), and H2(I)⊆H1(I).

Endpoint-vanishing first-order space and the Dirichlet form. For the bounded interval (0,L), L>0, define H01(0,L):=Cc∞(0,L)‾ ∥⋅∥H1, the closure of the test functions in H1(0,L), and define the Dirichlet form on it by qD[u]:=∥Du∥L2(0,L)2=∫0L∣Du∣2.

Elementary consequences, recorded for reuse. Weak derivatives are unique as locally integrable classes under Countable Choice, are additive and C-homogeneous, and classical derivatives of continuously differentiable functions are weak derivatives. The cited published items supply these facts, so H1(I) and H2(I) are well-defined linear subspaces of L2(I;C). No claim is made here that H01(0,L) equals the set of classes with vanishing endpoint values; that identification is proved on this page from the trace estimates.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources