How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Position and momentum operators on Euclidean L2
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Fix and an integer , and work in the complex Hilbert space with inner product linear in the first argument (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, The space as the quotient by null functions, with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
Weak derivatives. For and , say that the -th weak derivative of exists in when there is a class with where is the classical partial derivative and the pairing is bilinear without conjugation (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function). Such a is unique as an class (Uniqueness of a weak derivative as an almost-everywhere class); write . The Sobolev space is the set of classes for which all exist in , and is the set of with for every , with written for the iterated derivative (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
(a) Position operators. For define Thus is the class of the pointwise product with the -th coordinate function.
(b) Momentum operators. For define
Both and are densely defined -linear operators in : for the compactly supported smooth classes lie in the domain because is bounded there, and for they lie in the domain because their classical derivatives are weak derivatives in (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
For density, the classes of are dense in by Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n) and Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. Since these classes lie in each domain as above, both operator domains are dense.
For a class one has and pointwise. The self-adjointness of these operators and their Fourier representation are proved in the companion self-adjointness lemma on this page, not asserted here; for the domain of the single momentum operator coincides with .
Depends on
Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
Uniqueness of a weak derivative as an almost-everywhere class
Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
The space as the quotient by null functions
with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space
Hilbert space
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Ch. 2-3 pp. 55-100 (position and momentum operators, their domains and spectral calculus)
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations (Springer Universitext 2011), Section 8.1-8.2 pp. 201-210 (one-dimensional and Euclidean weak derivatives and Sobolev spaces)