Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Position and momentum operators on Euclidean L2

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix ℏ>0 and an integer d≥1, and work in the complex Hilbert space L2(Rd;C) with inner product ⟨f,g⟩=∫Rdfg‾ linear in the first argument (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

Weak derivatives. For f∈L2(Rd;C) and j∈{1,…,d}, say that the j-th weak derivative of f exists in L2 when there is a class g∈L2(Rd;C) with ∫Rdf Djφ=(−1)∫Rdg φfor every φ∈Cc∞(Rd), where Djφ is the classical partial derivative and the pairing is bilinear without conjugation (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function). Such a g is unique as an L2 class (Uniqueness of a weak derivative as an almost-everywhere class); write Djf:=g. The Sobolev space W1,2(Rd;C) is the set of classes f∈L2 for which D1f,…,Ddf all exist in L2, and W2,2(Rd;C) is the set of f∈W1,2 with Djf∈W1,2 for every j, with DjDkf written for the iterated derivative (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

(a) Position operators. For j∈{1,…,d} define D(Qj):={f∈L2(Rd;C): x↦xjf(x)∈L2(Rd;C)},(Qjf)(x):=xjf(x). Thus Qjf is the class of the pointwise product with the j-th coordinate function.

(b) Momentum operators. For j∈{1,…,d} define D(Pj):={f∈L2(Rd;C): Djf exists in L2},Pjf:=−iℏ Djf.

Both Qj and Pj are densely defined C-linear operators in L2(Rd;C): for Qj the compactly supported smooth classes lie in the domain because xj is bounded there, and for Pj they lie in the domain because their classical derivatives are weak derivatives in L2 (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

For density, the classes of Cc∞(Rd;C) are dense in W0,2(Rd;C)=L2(Rd;C) by Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n) and Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. Since these classes lie in each domain as above, both operator domains are dense.

For a class f∈Cc∞(Rd) one has Qjf=xjf and Pjf=−iℏ ∂jf pointwise. The self-adjointness of these operators and their Fourier representation are proved in the companion self-adjointness lemma on this page, not asserted here; for d=1 the domain D(P) of the single momentum operator coincides with W1,2(R;C).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources