Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular time-ordered contraction coefficients

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice: for every sequence (En)n∈N of nonempty sets there is a function c with domain N such that c(n)∈En for all n (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). This premise is inherited from the construction of Hμ in Tempered time-ordered scalar two-point carrier; the finite contractions below require no additional choice assumption.

Set X=R4. Fix μ≥0 and the (−+++), shell, Fourier, and coordinate conventions of Tempered time-ordered scalar two-point carrier. That current supplier states that its relative-coordinate tempered distribution Hμ is symmetric, agrees with the ordered Wightman kernels on strictly ordered time supports and on spacelike-separated supports, and has no prefactor i in its definition. Its current carrier is a draft with a supplied conditional proof; the formula below uses that exact interface. Complex integrals of compactly supported regular kernels use the componentwise Riemann convention in Regular polynomial field functional algebra: write the integrand as its real part plus i times its imaginary part and integrate each real component.

For open Ω⊆Rm, D(Ω) is the space of smooth compactly supported complex tests with the LF topology, and D′(Ω) is its continuous complex-linear dual, paired bilinearly with no conjugation (Test function space d of an open set, Test function topology, Distribution). Schwartz space consists of smooth functions with all polynomially weighted derivatives bounded; S′ is its continuous complex-linear dual with bilinear pairing (Schwartz space and its seminorms, Schwartz topology and convergence, Tempered distribution).

For any relative-coordinate distribution K∈S′(R4), define its translation-invariant two-point bidistribution K~∈D′(R4×R4) by ⟨K~,Ψ⟩=⟨K, z⟼∫R4Ψ(y+z,y) dy⟩,Ψ∈D(R4×R4). The inner function is a test function: its support lies in the difference of the two compact coordinate projections of supp⁡Ψ; each derivative in z is the Riemann integral of the corresponding first-variable derivative of Ψ over a compact rectangle containing the fixed compact second-variable projection; iterate the real single-coordinate differentiation rule over every derivative in z and apply it to both real components, using the compact parameter-integral differentiation convention of Regular polynomial field functional algebra. On each fixed compact support space, every output derivative seminorm is bounded by the volume of a compact rectangle containing the second-variable projection times the corresponding source derivative seminorm. The support of the output lies in the compact difference of the two projections. Thus this map is continuous on each fixed-support test space, and hence on the LF test topology Test function topology. Thus the displayed formula defines a distribution without multiplying singular distributions. Write Hμ=H~μ.

For F∈Preg(R4), define its support as the finite union of the coordinate projections of the supports of its nonconstant symmetric coefficient kernels. This is a compact set and is presentation independent by Tensor-product tests are dense in smooth compact kernel topology. For compact A,B⊂R4, write A≽outB when x−y∉C−:={(t,x)∈R4:t≤−∣x∣}for every x∈A, y∈B. This means the first support has no point in the closed causal past of the second, using the supplier's fixed inertial chart.

For n≥1, let Qn consist of finite coefficient families in n independent real smooth fields ϕi∈C∞(X;R) of the form Q(ϕ1,…,ϕn)=∑r∫qr(x(1),…,x(n))∏i=1n∏a=1riϕi(xa(i)) dx, where r=(r1,…,rn)∈N0n ranges over a finite set, qr∈Cc∞(Xr1×⋯×Xrn;C), and each coefficient is symmetric within every block x(i)=(x1(i),…,xri(i)). X0 is a one-point space; an empty product and an integral over no variables leave the scalar coefficient unchanged. Here dx is the product of the d4xa(i) coordinate volume elements over all variables present. The product ∏iFi(ϕi) of regular polynomials is in Qn.

For 1≤i<j≤n, define the one-pair contraction DHij:Qn→Qn linearly and termwise on each block coefficient qr. It is zero if ri=0 or rj=0; otherwise it has multidegree r−ei−ej and coefficient qr−ei−ej′(x′)=rirj⟨Hμ,(x,y)⟼qr(…,x,…,y,…)⟩, where x occupies the first variable of block i, y occupies the first variable of block j, and the uncontracted variables x′ are held as parameters. The result remains symmetric within each remaining block. The parameter-pairing theorem Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families makes this coefficient smooth and compactly supported. The factor rirj counts the choices of one variable from each symmetric block, so this is exactly one functional derivative in each of the independent field slots followed by pairing against Hμ.

For r≥1, define full symmetrization by Sym⁡rh(x1,…,xr)=1r!∑π∈Srh(xπ(1),…,xπ(r)), with Sym⁡0 the identity. For Q∈Qn, define mnQ by setting ϕ1=⋯=ϕn=ϕ and replacing each remaining block coefficient by its full symmetrization across all variables. For a finite-degree Q, the formal exponential is defined coefficientwise by exp⁡ ⁣(η∑1≤i<j≤nDHij)Q=∑r≥0ηrr!(∑1≤i<j≤nDHij)rQ, which terminates because each contraction lowers total degree by two. The parameter η is formal and fixed by complex conjugation. Define TnH(F1,…,Fn)(ϕ)=mnexp⁡ ⁣(η∑1≤i<j≤nDHij)∏i=1nFi(ϕi),T0H=1,T1H(F)=F. The tensor-product distribution theorem Tensor product distributions and iterated pairings and the parameter-pairing theorem above make every contraction well defined; no diagonal product occurs. Symmetry of Hμ makes TnH symmetric in its inputs.

For any V∈Preg(R4) and formal coupling z, define SzH(V)=∑n=0∞(iz/η)nn! TnH(V,…,V)with coefficients in Preg(R4)[η,η−1]. This is a coefficientwise formal series; the definition asserts no convergence in z, no time-ordered product for singular local functionals, and no continuum interacting field.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources