How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Critical Abelian Higgs fields, winding and divisor data
Definition
Let and be real parameters, set , identify the oriented Euclidean plane with using coordinates , and use the Hodge star convention , . A field pair is a smooth real one-form on the trivial complex line over and a smooth function . Its unit-charge covariant derivative is , its curvature is with , and its transverse energy is The pair has finite energy when this nonnegative Lebesgue integral is finite. An admissible boundary sector consists of an integer , a radius , and smooth functions and real -periodic on such that and , uniformly as ; is its winding. A gauge transformation is for a smooth real-valued function on .
For , the positive critical first-order equations are and ; for the negative equations are and . The adjective critical refers to the displayed energy normalization and these square-saturating equations. For a positive-winding solution, its divisor is an effective finite divisor , where the are distinct, the multiplicities are positive integers, vanishes exactly at the , and near each it has the local form with smooth and nonzero there. The degree is ; the empty divisor has degree zero. Negative winding uses the conjugate field and reversed orientation, with .
On the complement of the divisor, define . The associated scalar Taubes datum is a real function smooth away from the divisor such that extends smoothly across every , at infinity, and, as a distribution, When the limit exists, the magnetic flux is . These are mathematical configuration and normalization conventions; they make no assertion that a physical model describes nature.