Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Principal connection 1-form from a horizontal distribution

Definition

Assume ACω, and let π:P→M be a smooth right principal G-bundle for a finite-dimensional real Lie group G, with g=Lie⁡(G)=TeG. A supplied principal connection is a smooth, right-invariant complement TP=VP⊕H, where VP=ker⁡dπ; write v:TP→VP for the projection along H, and let KH(X,Y)=−v([hX,hY]) be its vertical-valued curvature. For Z∈g and p∈P, define the fundamental vertical vector ZP(p)=ddt∣t=0pexp⁡G(tZ). The orbit differential ζp:g→VpP, Z↦ZP(p), is a linear isomorphism, as proved below. Define the principal connection 1-form by

ωp(X):=ζp−1(vpX),X∈TpP.

Then ω is a smooth g-valued 1-form satisfying ω(ZP)=Z, ker⁡ω=H, and Rg∗ω=Ad⁡g−1ω for every fixed g∈G. Conversely, a smooth g-valued 1-form with the reproduction and equivariance properties determines the principal connection H=ker⁡ω. The converted vertical curvature κH:=ω∘KH is a g-valued alternating 2-form; its equality with the Cartan curvature is established in the curvature lemma.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a smooth right principal G-bundle π:P→M, and a supplied principal connection H.

[A1]

ACω is countable choice: every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The principal bundle has a smooth right action with equivariant local principal charts. Smooth principal G-bundle

[F2]

A principal connection is a smooth right-invariant complement TP=VP⊕H, and KH(X,Y)=−v([hX,hY]). Principal connections and vertical curvature

[F3]

g=TeG with the bracket transported from left-invariant smooth vector fields is a finite-dimensional real Lie algebra. The tangent space at the identity is a Lie algebra

[F4]

For each W∈g, the exponential map is defined by exp⁡G(W)=γW(1), where γW:R→G is the unique one-parameter subgroup with γW′(0)=W. Exponential map of a Lie group, One-parameter subgroups are integral curves of left-invariant fields

[F5]

Ad⁡g=d(Cg)e, where Cg(h)=ghg−1, and Ad⁡ is a smooth group representation. Conjugation and the adjoint representation of a Lie group, Adjoint is a smooth Lie-group representation

[F6]

For smooth maps, differentials compose by the chain rule. The differential of a smooth map, The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps

Proof

1.1A1F1F3F4F6

Write p=s(x)a in an equivariant principal chart, with s its local section and a∈G. Then ϕp(h)=ph=s(x)(ah); freeness and transitivity give bijectivity on the fibre, and this coordinate formula gives a smooth inverse. Hence ϕp:G→Px, h↦ph, is a diffeomorphism, so its differential at e is a linear isomorphism TeG→TpPx=VpP. For each t∈R, the curve ct(s):=γZ(ts) is a one-parameter subgroup with initial tangent tZ; uniqueness in [F4] gives ct=γtZ. Thus exp⁡G(tZ)=γtZ(1)=γZ(t). The curve t↦pexp⁡G(tZ) is therefore ϕp∘γZ, whose derivative at zero is d(ϕp)eZ; hence ζp is the stated isomorphism.

2.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1

In the same chart, ζp is the derivative of the smooth action map and its inverse is the derivative of the inverse fibre coordinate, so the family ζ and its inverse are smooth bundle maps. The complement TP=VP⊕H gives a smooth bundle projection v, so ω=ζ−1∘v is a smooth fibrewise-linear 1-form. On a vertical vector ZP(p)=ζp(Z), the projection is the vector itself; therefore ω(ZP)=Z. Also vpX=0 exactly when X∈Hp, so ker⁡ω=H.

2.2F1F2F5F6step 1.1

For g∈G, let Rg(p)=pg. The maps Rg∘ϕp and ϕpg∘Cg−1 agree because phg=pg(g−1hg). Differentiating at e by [F6] gives d(Rg)pZP(p)=(Ad⁡g−1Z)P(pg). Since H and VP are right-invariant, their projections commute with dRg; applying the definition of ω yields ωpg(dRgX)=Ad⁡g−1ωp(X).

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

Conversely, if ω has the stated reproduction and equivariance properties, define v:=ζ∘ω and H:=ker⁡ω. Reproduction gives v∘ζ=ζ, hence v2=v, im⁡v=VP, and TP=VP⊕H. Equivariance of ω and the orbit differential identity from step 2.2 make H right-invariant; smoothness of ω makes it a smooth subbundle. Thus this is a principal connection and the construction is inverse to step 2.1.

4.1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

The imported curvature KH is a smooth alternating map with values in VP, and ω restricts to the inverse of ζ:P×g→VP; consequently κH=ω∘KH is a well-defined smooth g-valued alternating 2-form. This is only the conversion of its target fibre; the Cartan identity is proved separately.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources