Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the affine-local Proj construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let S be a scheme and let A=⨁d≥0Ad be a quasi-coherent graded OS-algebra (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme): each Ad is a quasi-coherent OS-module and the multiplication maps Ad⊗OSAe→Ad+e are OS-linear. No finite generation of A over A0 is assumed.

Construction. For an affine open U=Spec⁡R⊆S put BU=⨁d≥0Γ(U,Ad), a graded R-algebra, and let PU=Proj⁡BU be its Proj with its scheme structure (Proj carries a scheme structure). For affine opens V⊆U the canonical isomorphisms PU∣V≅PV of Affine-local graded algebras glue their Proj charts are compatible with inclusions and satisfy the triple-overlap cocycle, so the schemes PU glue along the affine opens of S to a scheme Proj⁡SA, equipped with the open immersions PU↪Proj⁡SA identifying PU with the restriction to U. The relative twists are the OProj⁡SA-modules O(n), n∈Z, obtained by gluing, over each affine open U with its coordinates BU, the sheaves BU(n)~ on PU=Proj⁡BU of Twisting sheaf on Proj; the gluing is compatible for the following reason. Write V=Spec⁡C⊆U. The degreewise restriction calculation in Affine-local graded algebras glue their Proj charts gives BV=BU⊗RC, not an identification with BU itself. For a homogeneous f∈(BU)+, localisation and scalar extension give BU(n)(f)⊗RC  ≅  BV(n)(fC),(b/fk)⊗c⟼(b⊗c)/fCk. To check this formula, first localise the graded ring: the universal properties identify (BU)f⊗RC with (BV)fC by the displayed fractions. Taking degree n gives the stated shifted degree-zero module isomorphism, because tensor product distributes over homogeneous direct sums. The restriction of the associated module sheaf to the affine open D+(f)×UV is associated to this scalar-extended module by An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open: tensoring over (BU)(f) with (BU)(f)⊗RC is tensoring over R with C. These identifications commute with further localisation and successive restriction, since each sends a fraction to the same fraction with its coefficients restricted. They therefore agree on overlaps and satisfy the triple cocycle, so the twists glue. No invertibility of the twists is needed.

Structural morphism. On PU=Proj⁡BU the ring R=Γ(U,OS) acts on each BU(n) through the structure map R→(BU)0, so PU carries a canonical morphism PU→Spec⁡R=U induced on each chart by the structure map R→(BU)0→(BU)(f). These morphisms are compatible with the identifications PU∣V≅PV and glue to a morphism π:Proj⁡SA⟶S, called the structural morphism, through which Proj⁡SA is a scheme over S (Schemes and morphisms over a base).

Absolute case. If S=Spec⁡R is affine and A=B~ for a graded R-algebra B, then Proj⁡SA=Proj⁡B and π is the structural morphism of the absolute Proj; in particular Proj⁡Spec⁡RR[x0,…,xn]~≅PRn by Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring.

Remarks

  • No finiteness. Existence of Proj⁡SA uses only quasi-coherence of the graded pieces and the affine-local Proj construction; no finite generation is required. If, on each affine open U of the base, BU is generated by (BU)1 over (BU)0, all relative twists are invertible by Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings applied on those affine-base restrictions. This degree-one generation hypothesis does not require finitely many generators and is not part of this definition.
  • Choice. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the affine Proj construction and the affine-local gluing; the definition itself selects no data beyond that interface.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources