Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular, hyperregular and almost-regular Legendre domains

Physical scope

Mathematical regularity package for Lagrangian models; it does not assert that a particular physical Lagrangian satisfies the package.

Definition

Assume countable choice ACω, as in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), for the smooth cotangent-bundle carrier convention used by this page; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed.

Let D be an open subset of the time-dependent tangent bundle R×TQ of a finite-dimensional smooth manifold Q, and let L:D→R be smooth. For fixed t, the fibre derivative is the map

FL(t,q,v)=(t,q,p),p(w)=dds∣s=0L(t,q,v+sw),

as in Fibre derivative or Legendre map of a Lagrangian. In induced coordinates pi=∂L/∂vi.

The Lagrangian is regular at (t,q,v) when the velocity Hessian (∂2L/∂vi∂vj) is invertible there; regularity gives only a local inverse branch. It is hyperregular on a declared domain when FL is a diffeomorphism from that entire domain onto an open subset of R×T∗Q.

It is almost regular on a declared open domain D0⊆D, with the inherited open-submanifold structure, when the following are all assumed: FL∣D0 has constant rank; its image N is an embedded submanifold of R×T∗Q; its corestriction D0→N is a surjective submersion (its differential is surjective at every point); and every fibre of that corestriction is connected. These hypotheses are not consequences of singularity alone.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources