Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rank-one trivial modular functor

Example

Let C=VectCfd, the category of finite-dimensional complex vector spaces and linear maps, take the distinguished vacuum object to be E=C, and use the trivial extension Q=Surf (anomaly parameter 0). Use boundary reversal D(X)=X∨=Hom⁡C(X,C) with the canonical biduality map ηX:X→X∨∨. Give every connected surface Σ with ordered, parametrized boundary labels X1,…,Xn∈C the right-exact functor FΣ(X1,…,Xn)=X1⊗C⋯⊗CXn, where the empty tensor product is C. Every mapping class acts by the identity natural transformation. Disjoint union uses the canonical tensor-product isomorphism. The evaluation pairing is the right-exact functor κ:C⊠C→C induced by (X,Y)↦X⊗CY. Under the canonical equivalence C⊠C≃VectCfd, define coev:VectCfd→C⊠C by W↦W⊠C; its coevaluation object is Δ=coev(C)=C⊠C. The pairing-duality compatibility is the canonical natural isomorphism X⊗Y≅Hom⁡C(X,Y∗)∗ sending x⊗y to the functional f↦f(x)(y). The symmetry is given by the tensor flip.

For the unique simple label 1=C, every connected genus-g state space is Fg,n(1,…,1)=C. Both separating and nonseparating sewings are the canonical tensor-unit isomorphisms, with the unique intermediate label 1=1∨. The torus mapping-class generators S and T act by the 1×1 identity matrices. This is a mathematical modular-functor example; it is not asserted to arise from a VOA or a physical conformal field theory.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Finite-dimensional complex vector spaces, the standard tensor product, algebraic dual and biduality, the evaluation and coevaluation functors specified in the Example, and the surface modular-functor definition of Chiral modular functor with sewing and anomaly. All surfaces are the connected objects of Surf; their boundary circles have the ordered parametrizations fixed in that definition.

[F1]

Chiral modular functor with sewing and anomaly: a modular functor requires an extension with connected homotopy fibers, a genus-zero section and the disk-insertion equivalence on extension fibers; a modular algebra then supplies the category duality data, labeled-surface functors, mapping-class actions, vacuum capping, and coherent disjoint-union and sewing isomorphisms.

[F2]

Chiral modular functor with sewing and anomaly: in the semisimple case the coevaluation object is the direct sum over simple labels Xi∨⊠Xi; the vacuum insertion, boundary-reversal convention, and iterated-sewing coherence are part of the axioms.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

The category C is C-linear and abelian. Each morphism space is finite dimensional; every object is a finite direct sum of the single simple object C; every object is projective because every surjection of vector spaces splits; and a vector space of dimension d has a composition series of length d. Thus C is finite in the sense of [F1]. The contravariant equivalence D(X)=X∨ has the canonical biduality ηX:X→X∨∨, and D(ηX)∘ηDX=idDX. Under the Deligne equivalence C⊠C≃C, the functor κ sends X⊠Y to X⊗Y, and coev sends a vector space W to the two-factor object W⊠C. The displayed map x⊗y↦(f↦f(x)(y)) identifies this pairing with Hom⁡(X,DY)∗; tensor flip corresponds to the duality transpose and canonical biduality. Thus it supplies the required pairing-duality compatibility. Its object Δ=C⊠C is fixed by the factor-swap symmetry. The first triangle composite sends X canonically through C⊗(C⊗X) to X; the second sends it through (X⊗C)⊗C to X. These are the standard natural associativity and unit isomorphisms, so both triangle isomorphisms hold. The pairing is therefore symmetric and nondegenerate in the sense of [F1].

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra

Tensor product is a right-exact functor in each finite-dimensional vector-space variable. For the identity extension Q=Surf, each homotopy fiber is contractible and the genus-zero section is the identity, so every disk-insertion functor λϕ is an equivalence between contractible groupoids. For a parametrization-preserving mapping class, assigning the identity on each tensor product is natural and preserves composition because id∘id=id. For a disjoint union, the assigned map is the canonical associator and symmetry of tensor products; the empty surface receives C, the tensor unit. Capping an added boundary labeled by the distinguished vacuum object C uses X⊗C≅X, so vacuum insertion holds.

3.1givenF2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Since C has exactly one simple isomorphism class, its coevaluation sum in [F2] has one term C∨⊠C≅C⊠C. Inserting it at either pair of oppositely oriented boundaries leaves the external tensor product unchanged up to its canonical associator and unit maps. Thus the separating and nonseparating sewing maps are isomorphisms, and all intermediate-label sums have one term.

4.1givenF1F2step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Every composite graph operation reduces to inserting or removing tensor units, rebracketing, and permuting tensor factors. On a pure tensor, each canonical associator or unitor preserves the ordered list of vector entries after rebracketing or deleting a unit, and each symmetry permutes that list by the prescribed boundary permutation. Pure tensors span every finite tensor product, so any two composites with the same graph operation agree as linear maps. The identity mapping-class action preserves this equality. The torus generators are particular mapping classes and therefore each acts on the one-dimensional state space as [1]. This verifies the modular-algebra axioms and the claimed S,T matrices.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources