Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The level-one affine sl2 current relation

Statement

Let e=(0100), f=(0010), and h=diag⁡(1,−1) in sl2(C), with [e,f]=h, [h,e]=2e, [h,f]=−2f, and normalized invariant form B(e,f)=1, B(h,h)=2. The long root has square 2, h∨=2, and at level ℓ=1 the simple affine VOA has Sugawara central charge cVir=1. Its vacuum satisfies e−121=0; on every weak module M, the normal product :JMe(z)JMe(z): vanishes and every mode en is locally nilpotent. If v∈M and ejv=0 for all j>k, then ek2v=0. In contrast, e−221≠0 in the level-one VOA.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed sl2 basis and form, level ℓ=1, and the Sugawara conformal structure.

[F1]

The affine simple root alpha zero is delta minus the highest root gives α0=δ−α and h0=c−h in rank one; Affine node-zero fundamental weight defines Λ0 and its values on c, d, and h.

[F2]

Positive-integral-level simple affine module is integrable makes the vacuum module integrable, so its α0-root string is finite-dimensional. Finite-dimensional representations of sl2 then says a highest vector of h0-weight 1 is killed by the square of its lowering generator.

[F3]

Untwisted affine central extension gives [em,en]=[e,e]m+n+mδm,−nB(e,e)c=0.

[F4]

Uniform nilpotence for root currents of positive-integral-level simple affine VOAs gives the normal-product identity on weak modules and its mode-extraction argument, with N1=2 since both finite roots have square 2; its coefficient argument proves the bound at a truncation index and local nilpotence of arbitrary modes.

[F5]

Sugawara modes satisfy Virasoro at every noncritical complex level gives c=ℓdim⁡(sl2)/(ℓ+h∨), where Dual Coxeter number for the normalized invariant form defines h∨=γB/2 by the adjoint scalar ΩB=γBI, and Casimir operator relative to an invariant form defines ΩB as the sum of products of adjoint operators of dual basis vectors, and Sugawara modes act on affine currents with weight one gives [L0,en]=−nen.

Proof

1.1F1F2F5givenalgebra

The affine simple-root triple at node 0 has raising operator e0=f1, lowering operator f0=e−1 and Cartan element h0=c−h. On the vacuum, the raising operator vanishes and (c−h)1=1, since c acts by level 1 and h1=0. Integrability in [F2] makes this a finite-dimensional sl2 string, so its highest-weight-one vector is killed by f02, giving e−121=0. The finite root has (α,α)=2, so mα=2ℓ/(α,α)=1 and N1=2. The displayed invariant form gives B(e,e)=B(f,f)=B(e,h)=B(f,h)=0 by invariance, so the B-dual basis to (e,f,h) is (f,e,h/2). The adjoint Casimir is therefore ΩB=ad⁡(e)ad⁡(f)+ad⁡(f)ad⁡(e)+12ad⁡(h)2. On e it acts by [e,[f,e]]+[f,[e,e]]+12[h,[h,e]]=2e+0+2e=4e. By the normalized convention h∨=γB/2 where ΩB=γBI in the adjoint representation, h∨=2. Since dim⁡sl2=3, [F5] gives cVir=3/(1+2)=1.

1.2F3F4givenalgebra

The root current modes commute by [F3], so its normal product equals its coefficientwise product. The vertex-algebra iterate identity sends the zero state e−121 to the field :Je(z)Je(z):=0, and the module iterate identity gives the same zero product on every weak module. For v∈M, choose k such that env=0 for all n>k by lower truncation. In the coefficient of z−2(k+1) in JMe(z)2v, any term with an index above k vanishes after commuting that mode to the right; if both indices are at most k and sum to 2k, both equal k. The coefficient is therefore ek2v, and the zero product forces it to vanish. The bound applies to this truncation index k; [F4] proves local nilpotence for arbitrary fixed modes. This is an algebraic current-mode identity; it asserts no Hilbert-space positivity or analytic CFT construction.

2.1F1F3givenalgebra∎

To check the limit of the coefficient conclusion, on the level-one VOA put E=f2, F=e−2 and H=2c−h0, where h0 here denotes the horizontal zero mode of h. The affine bracket gives [E,F]=H, [H,E]=2E and [H,F]=−2F. The vacuum obeys E1=0 and H1=21, so EF1=21 and EF21=(HF+FH)1=2F1. Hence E2F21=41≠0, and therefore e−221≠0. Thus the cutoff condition in step 1.2 is essential.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources