How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Trivial reflection-positive Schwinger hierarchy
Example
For each , let be the zero functional on , and set . This is a degenerate but reflection-positive Euclidean Schwinger hierarchy in the two-dimensional conventions of this page.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Use the definitions of a Euclidean Schwinger hierarchy and its reflection-positive test algebra from this pair.
A Schwinger hierarchy fixes and continuous tempered functionals on (Euclidean Schwinger hierarchy in two dimensions).
Euclidean covariance and block symmetry mean and (Euclidean Schwinger hierarchy in two dimensions).
The reflection-positive quadratic form is (Reflection-positive Euclidean field data).
The example chooses for every and .
Verification
The zero functional is complex-linear and continuous on every Schwartz space. Its pullback by every Euclidean isometry or block permutation is still zero, so the normalization in [F1] and covariance and symmetry equalities in [F2] hold; the chosen degree-zero value is the required normalization.
In [F3], every summand with vanishes by [A1]. The only possible surviving term is , and it equals . Hence is real for every finite family, proving reflection positivity.
Let for and for , and choose , which is a nonzero smooth compactly supported test function in ; set and , with every other coefficient zero. Then the polynomial is nonzero while step 2.1 gives , so the positive form is degenerate. The example asserts neither a nontrivial field nor OS reconstruction.