How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An exactly solvable adiabatic branch: and comparison with the drift bound
Example
Take , , and in the datum of A one-frequency parameter-dependent action-angle branch, its transformed Hamiltonian and its drift generator, with , , , , , and initial datum , . The branch system is
so stays in on , and stays in for all . The quantity is exactly invariant, the solution stays in on , and
while the drift bound of Adiabatic action drift bound: order- change of the action on the time scale evaluates in this instance to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The datum , , , and the sets and data above.
The branch vector field is , , ; here , and , so the field is as displayed (A one-frequency parameter-dependent action-angle branch, its transformed Hamiltonian and its drift generator). [given]
The drift bound (Adiabatic action drift bound: order- change of the action on the time scale): if and the branch solution stays in the compact sets , then where and is the -average of . [given]
and , and derivatives of sums and products follow the algebra of derivatives and the chain rule. (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when )
and for all real (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine); the mean value theorem then gives and (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable is the neighborhood-uniform state-Lipschitz property of Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters. For a continuous field with this property on an open ODE domain, there is a unique maximal solution through each datum, and a solution of an autonomous field whose state remains in a compact subset of its open state domain near a finite endpoint extends past that endpoint (First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval, Extensions, maximal solutions, maximal intervals, and global solutions, Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it).
If a differentiable vector-valued curve on a compact interval has derivative norm at most , then its endpoint difference has norm at most times the interval length (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz).
The zero-derivative constancy fact used below is A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant: a differentiable real function on an interval whose derivative vanishes is constant.
Verification
Write the branch field as . On each cube with , [L4] gives, for and , Hence . Thus is continuous and locally Lipschitz on its open domain ; by [L5] there is a unique maximal solution through the stated datum.
Along the maximal solution of step 1.1, [L1] gives , , . Put . By [L3], so [L7] makes constant; with , we get .
Trapping and global forward existence: on , step 2.1 and [L4] give and hence Also and , so [L6] gives and . If , the state curve near stays in the compact subset of ; the autonomous compact-continuation clause of [L5] extends the maximal solution past , a contradiction. Hence . Since , on we have , and the bounds above place strictly inside . Thus the solution stays in on the required horizon, and [L2] applies.
Evaluate the theorem's constant: , so and . Moreover , , , and with , one has . The theorem thus gives , while the exact invariant gives consistent with the bound.
Depends on
Adiabatic action drift bound: order- change of the action on the time scale
A one-frequency parameter-dependent action-angle branch, its transformed Hamiltonian and its drift generator
The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with
A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant
If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz
Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval
Extensions, maximal solutions, maximal intervals, and global solutions
First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals
Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters
Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 10 Sections 10.2-10.3, Eqs. (10.28)-(10.42): action variable and adiabatic invariance, printed pages 5-8 of Chapter 10 (PDF pages 241-244)
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 version), Section 4.6, Eqs. (4.150)-(4.158): the action $I=\frac1{2\pi}\oint p\,dq$ and the averaged invariance statement, printed pages 113-115