How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Averaging estimate on for the scalar equation
Example
Take , , , (independent of ), , and the trapping data , , . Then is continuous, in with , and -periodic in ; on one may take and . The average and deviation of Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation are
The averaged system is , so solves it and stays in . With , and , the smallness hypothesis reads ; for it holds because . The averaging theorem then gives
The exact solution is , whose modulus is at most ; the theorem's bound is valid but not sharp here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data above and the scalar ODE , .
For this , and on , extended periodically; this is the construction of Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation, evaluated with the fundamental theorem for continuous integrands (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive , The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine); the endpoint values and periodicity used here are supplied by [L4]. [given]
The averaging theorem (Averaging for fast periodic oscillations: order- agreement on the time scale): under its hypotheses with a solution of the averaged system and , the solution of , exists on and satisfies there, with , , . [given]
The definition and theorem give (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine, Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two).
Sine and cosine are -periodic, and by their zero set (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi). Their ranges are (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine); in particular . Their differentiability in [L1] gives continuity.
Verification
By [L4], the continuous field is -periodic and bounded by one; its state derivative is zero, so and meet the hypotheses on . By [L1], and , so the averaged system is ; the constant curve is its solution with on , and . The constants are , , , , , and with , [L3] gives .
By [L2] the solution of , exists on and satisfies there. Directly, the primitive gives by [L1], so by [L4]; the stated bound holds and is not attained.
Depends on
Averaging for fast periodic oscillations: order- agreement on the time scale
Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation
Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive
The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine
Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two
The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi
Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.52)-(5.57): first-order averaging of a fast periodic term, printed pages 12-14 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 99-101)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 5 Sections 5.2-5.3, Eqs. (5.25)-(5.26): a perturbation whose one-period average vanishes produces only a periodic change, printed pages 96-97