Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A drive along the in-phase pattern of the two-mass chain: resonance exactly at that mode's frequency and a bounded steady response off resonance

Physical scope

A worked instance of the forced coupled quadratic model: the two equal-mass chain of the companion example with a prescribed generalized force J(t)=F cos(Omega t) u_+ along the in-phase pattern (a sinusoidal drive for Omega>0 and a constant-force specialization for Omega=0), the modal force components (F/m,0), the unbounded resonance at Omega = sqrt(k/m) with the explicit linearly growing modal motion, the bounded steady response of amplitude |F|/(2c) at Omega = sqrt((k+2c)/m), and the boundedness of every motion for Omega^2 not equal to k/m. The force is prescribed external data; no back-reaction, measured response or empirical value is asserted.

Example

The algebra below uses the fixed-unit numerical convention of The coupled quadratic oscillator model: mass metric, stiffness, generalized force, modal vocabulary and the small-oscillation model at a mechanical equilibrium, with coordinate units metres, time unit 1 s and energy unit 1 J. Physical model parameters are given their stated units; in matrix products, initial-vector identities and coefficient formulas their numerical coefficients in these fixed units are used. Modal amplitudes have common unit a∗=(1 J)1/2(1 s); the j-th component of a mass-normalized modal vector has unit sj/a∗. Modal oscillatory and hyperbolic coefficients have unit a∗, and zero-mode slopes have unit a∗/(1 s). Physical coordinates and energies are reconstructed with the coordinate units and 1 J, respectively. In particular a numerical single-mode datum q(0)=ui means a modal amplitude of one in this common amplitude unit.

Adopt the two-mass chain of Two coupled masses on a line: the in-phase and anti-phase normal modes, their frequencies, mode-energies and the zero-stiffness translation mode: mass metric M=mI2, stiffness K=(k+c−c−ck+c) with m>0, k>0, c>0, and modal vectors u±=(1,±1)/2m with modal stiffnesses λ+=k/m, λ−=(k+2c)/m and frequencies ω+=k/m, ω−=(k+2c)/m. Choose a real drive coefficient F≠0. In the physical equation J=Fu+cos⁡(Ωt) its unit is kg3/2 m s−2, since u+ has unit kg−1/2 and J is a force. Thus F/m is a modal force amplitude with unit a∗/s2, and ∣F∣/(2c) below is a modal coordinate amplitude with unit a∗; multiplying by u+ gives each particle's displacement amplitude. Choose a frequency Ω≥0 and prescribe J(t)=Fcos⁡(Ωt) u+. For Ω>0 this is the sinusoidal drive of The sinusoidally driven oscillator model: a prescribed external force f0cos⁡(Ωt) added to the damped oscillator; for Ω=0 it is the constant force allowed by clause (b) of The coupled quadratic oscillator model: mass metric, stiffness, generalized force, modal vocabulary and the small-oscillation model at a mechanical equilibrium. In either case it is prescribed external data, so the model is the forced coupled quadratic model Mq′′+Kq=J. The all-time claims below concern maximal motions on R; local solutions are their restrictions. Then:

  1. the modal force components of J(t)=J0cos⁡(Ωt) with J0=Fu+ are ψ0=OTM−1/2J0=(F/m, 0): the drive excites the in-phase modal coordinate alone, with modal amplitude F/m, and leaves the relative coordinate unforced;
  2. if Ω=ω+=k/m, then qp(t)=F2mω+ tsin⁡(ω+t) u+ is a motion of the model, of in-phase pattern, with linearly growing amplitude ∣F∣t/(2mω+), and every motion of the model is unbounded on [0,∞);
  3. if Ω2≠k/m then every motion of the model is bounded on [0,∞); in particular at Ω=ω−=(k+2c)/m — the frequency of the unforced relative mode — the drive is non-resonant and the steady modal response has amplitude ∣F∣/m∣k/m−(k+2c)/m∣=∣F∣2c;
  4. the resonance condition is exactly that the drive frequency equal the frequency of a mode whose modal force component does not vanish: here the in-phase mode at ω+, not the relative mode at ω−.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data m,k,c>0 of the chain, the modal vectors u± and modal stiffnesses λ±, the modal data O, M1/2 with e±=(1,±1)/2, real F≠0 and Ω≥0.

[F1]

Chain data and modes (Two coupled masses on a line: the in-phase and anti-phase normal modes, their frequencies, mode-energies and the zero-stiffness translation mode clauses 1, 2 and 4): M=mI2, K as displayed, O=[e+ e−], u±=M−1/2e±, Ku±=λ±Mu± with the displayed λ±, and K is positive definite.

[F2]

Forced modal response (The forced coupled quadratic model: modal responses, resonance, and boundedness for positive definite stiffness off resonance clauses 1-3): the unique motion with a datum has the modal convolution form with ψ=OTM−1/2J; for J(t)=J0cos⁡(Ωt) the modal force is ψ(t)=ψ0cos⁡(Ωt) with ψ0=OTM−1/2J0; the sinusoidal particular functions of clauses 2(a)-(c) hold; every motion is qp+qh with qh free; in the resonant cases (some ψ0,i≠0 with λi>0, Ω2=λi, or λi=0, Ω=0) every motion is unbounded on [0,∞); and for positive definite K with no resonant index of nonzero modal force, every motion is bounded.

[F3]

Prescribed generalized force (The coupled quadratic oscillator model: mass metric, stiffness, generalized force, modal vocabulary and the small-oscillation model at a mechanical equilibrium clause (b)): J is continuous prescribed model data. For Ω>0 the cosine term has the restricted sinusoidal-drive status of The sinusoidally driven oscillator model: a prescribed external force f0cos⁡(Ωt) added to the damped oscillator clause (ii); for Ω=0 it is the constant-force specialization of the general J data. In both cases it depends on time alone and has no modelled back-reaction.

[F4]

Direct linear algebra (Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn): M−1/2=1mI2, J0=F(1,1)/2m, e+T(1,1)=2, e−T(1,1)=0; the products below are direct computations. The particular motions displayed are differentiated by the chain rule (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

Verification

technique · direct; compute the modal force, instantiate the resonant and non-resonant cases of the forced modal theorem, and evaluate the steady amplitude
1.1F1F4algebra

Modal force: with J0=Fu+=F(1,1)/2m, ψ0=OTM−1/2J0=Fm(e+Te−T)(1,1)2m=Fm(10), because e+T(1,1)=2 and e−T(1,1)=0. This is clause 1.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1algebra

Resonant case: for Ω=ω+, λ+=Ω2 and ψ0,+=F/m≠0; by [F2] clause 2(b) the function z+p(t)=Fmtsin⁡(ω+t)2ω+ solves the in-phase modal equation and qp=M−1/2Ozp=F2mω+tsin⁡(ω+t)u+ is a motion of the model, with the stated linearly growing amplitude; and by [F2] clause 3(a) every motion of the model is unbounded on [0,∞). This is clause 2.

2.2F1F2F4step 1.1algebra

Non-resonant case: if Ω2≠k/m=λ+, then the only index with ψ0,i≠0 is i=+ (since ψ0,−=0), and it is not resonant; K is positive definite by [F1], so [F2] clause 3(b) gives that every motion is bounded on [0,∞). At Ω=ω− the steady in-phase response of [F2] clause 2(a) has amplitude ∣ψ0,+∣/∣λ+−Ω2∣=∣F∣m/2cm=∣F∣/(2c), and the relative mode has zero modal force. This is clause 3.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

Resonance reading: by [F2] the resonant frequencies are exactly the frequencies of the modal directions with nonzero modal force component; here ψ0 is supported on the in-phase direction alone, so the resonance is at ω+ and the equally available frequency ω− of the relative mode does not produce resonance for this drive. This is clause 4.

4.1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

Clauses 1-4 are verified on the explicit data under the prescribed drive [F3]; no damping, back-reaction, measured response or apparatus detail is asserted, and the parameters are model data.

Remarks

  • The unbounded motion is a mode-shaped oscillation. The resonant motion of clause 2 keeps the in-phase pattern u+ fixed and grows linearly in amplitude; it is not a runaway in an arbitrary direction, and the prescribed particular response has zero relative coordinate. An arbitrary motion can additionally contain the bounded homogeneous relative oscillation of the free model.

  • Why the amplitude at Ω=ω− grows as c→0+. ∣F∣/(2c) is the steady amplitude at the relative-mode frequency; as the coupling tends to zero the two frequencies merge (ω−→ω+) and the drive approaches resonance, so the bounded steady amplitude grows without bound. This is the limiting consistency of clauses 2 and 3 and not an assertion about any particular apparatus.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources