How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elastic reflection from a fixed sphere: the branch , the uniform density and the total of a contact model
Assuming countable choice for the locally defined incident and solid-angle measures, a separately adopted fixed-wall contact model of a reduced label of mass reflecting elastically from an impenetrable sphere of radius : the example-specific rule reverses the normal velocity component and preserves the tangential component, so speed and angular momentum are conserved across contact. The example computes the branch contribution , the constant density and the total . This fixed-wall rule is outside both the finite-range hypothesis of the central-scattering theorem and the finite-mass two-label restitution postulate; the comparison concerns only the normal-velocity reversal. The finite total does not contradict the Coulomb forward divergence. The data are declared model data; the example reports no observation or measured value.
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the mathematical incident and solid-angle measures below.
Declared model. Fix a length (the sphere radius) and a reduced mass . In a fixed inertial chart (Inertial frames, stationary observers and the adopted Galilean transformations between frames), let the sphere be immovable and centred at the origin. For the label position is a continuous curve , affine on each side of one contact time , with one-sided velocity limits and . Its incoming affine line has speed , direction and perpendicular distance from the origin. Separately adopt, for this fixed-wall model, the elastic reflection rule at the contact point with outward unit normal : that is, the normal component reverses and the tangential component is unchanged. Its normal-velocity reversal is analogous to the case of Adopted impact and open-mass extensions of the force branch: the isolated reciprocal impulse model, the collinear restitution contact law and the open-body material accounting clause (ii), but it is not a formal member of that law: the postulate assumes a finite-mass two-label collinear contact, whereas this example prescribes an immovable wall and a vector reflection rule. The inward unit normal makes the angle with ; equivalently is the perpendicular distance of the incoming line from the centre.
Incident preparation and contact cross-section. Choose orthonormal vectors perpendicular to the common incoming direction . For an incident offset , where , the first contact is . The transverse component of the reflected direction is a positive multiple of , so its outgoing azimuth is . Let and . Adopt uniform incident area measure on Borel subsets of and solid-angle measure on , using the abstract mathematical measures of Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density. Define the contact cross-section measure by , where is the outgoing direction map. For an angular band abbreviate . A differential contact cross-section is a density satisfying for every Borel . This is a local definition for the fixed-wall contact model, independent of the smooth central-model class of Scattering data of the central model class: the scattering motion, the impact parameter, the asymptotic directions, the deflection conventions and the uniform-incident preparation. The centre, grazing circle and azimuth seam have zero incident area and supply no atoms; free incoming lines with do not hit the sphere and are excluded from this contact cross-section.
Assertion to check. The motion is a single reflection with deflection so the branch is on , the differential cross-section is the constant , and the truncated total cross-section over the whole branch is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice for the mathematical measures; the declared sphere radius , mass , speed , impact parameter , incoming direction , contact point with outward normal , the piecewise-affine trajectory of the Example and its reflection rule, and the locally defined incident measure , solid-angle measure , direction map and contact cross-section .
The example's separately adopted reflection rule and Moore's normal/tangential split: the reflected velocity is , so and the tangential component is unchanged for ; the angular momentum about the centre is unchanged across contact because the impulse passes through the origin: (The cross product in ).
Plane geometry (The Euclidean inner product on ): at the first contact of the incoming line with the sphere, and the acute incidence angle is . Its impact parameter satisfies , so . The reflection law gives , hence the deflection angle is .
Trigonometry (Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ): maps increasingly onto ; ; and for ; ; derivatives of and of compositions are the usual ones.
Abstract branch pushforward (Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density, One-dimensional substitution on a deflection branch: the outgoing angular measure has density , hence cross-section density ): for the mathematical measures and , any bijective branch with nonzero derivative and inverse satisfies on every Borel set. The supplier proves this by one-dimensional substitution on interior rectangles and Borel measure uniqueness; its branch and measures are abstract data independent of any smooth potential or physical trajectory. Thus it applies to the locally defined contact pushforward after the branch hypotheses have been verified. Truncated-band integration uses The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then and Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length.
Verification
Reflection and conservation: by [L1], and the angular momentum about the centre is conserved across the contact; hence the two free pieces of the motion are straight lines and the motion has a constant angular momentum with . This verifies directly for the incoming line the same geometric identity used in Scattering data of the central model class: the scattering motion, the impact parameter, the asymptotic directions, the deflection conventions and the uniform-incident preparation clause (ii); the contact trajectory itself is outside that definition's smooth central-model class.
Deflection: let be the acute angle between the inward normal at first contact and the incoming direction , so that by [L2]. The reflection turns the velocity by the angle computed in [L2], namely ; since we have and .
Branch and inverse: the map is strictly decreasing on by [L3] and its image is ; solving gives on , which is with . Thus the model realises a single deflection branch with image , and no branch sum is needed for it.
Contact pushforward: step 2.1 verifies the abstract branch hypotheses of [L4], and substituting into the reflection rule gives . The transverse coefficient is positive for , verifying that the outgoing azimuth is and the direction map is . Therefore, for every Borel , . Since , the locally defined differential contact cross-section is . Using this equals for every : the contact pushforward is , so the outgoing angular distribution of uniformly incident contacts is uniform, and the density is finite, positive and independent of .
Truncated total: by [L4] and the fundamental theorem, for the full image interval and for the band value is , finite; in particular the branch has a finite ideal total .
Model boundary: the motion just computed is piecewise linear with a contact rule, not a central-force trajectory of class with a finite-range potential; the quadrature theorem Finite-range central scattering in the model class: the scattering motion on all of time, the asymptotic velocities and impact parameter , the advance with principal deflection , and the cross-section of a deflection branch does not apply to it, and the finite total is a property of this contact model, not a counterexample to the forward divergence of the ideal Coulomb branch. The declared data are model data: no measurement is reported, and the agreement of the algebraic form with the cited impenetrable-sphere computation is a consistency check of the model, not evidence about nature.
Remarks
-
Units. , , , , , and with (Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework).
-
Why the rule is not a potential. The impenetrable sphere corresponds to no finite-range potential; its force is a contact impulse at . This example-specific fixed-wall law differs from the finite-mass two-label extension in Adopted impact and open-mass extensions of the force branch: the isolated reciprocal impulse model, the collinear restitution contact law and the open-body material accounting, so the example illustrates the model boundary rather than an instance of its restitution law or the smooth-potential theorem.
Depends on
Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density
Adopted impact and open-mass extensions of the force branch: the isolated reciprocal impulse model, the collinear restitution contact law and the open-body material accounting
Scattering data of the central model class: the scattering motion, the impact parameter, the asymptotic directions, the deflection conventions and the uniform-incident preparation
The differential and truncated total cross-sections of a deflection branch: densities, units, branch sums and the empirical qualifications of the uniform-incident reading
Finite-range central scattering in the model class: the scattering motion on all of time, the asymptotic velocities and impact parameter , the advance with principal deflection , and the cross-section of a deflection branch
One-dimensional substitution on a deflection branch: the outgoing angular measure has density , hence cross-section density
Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework
Inertial frames, stationary observers and the adopted Galilean transformations between frames
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
The Euclidean inner product on
The cross product in
Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine
Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine
Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (352)-(357): the impenetrable-sphere interaction, b = a cos(theta/2), the constant differential cross-section a^2/4 and the total cross-section pi a^2
- Jacob Moore and Contributors, Mechanics Map (Pennsylvania State University, 2nd ed.), Engineering LibreTexts, §11.4 'Surface Collisions and the Coefficient of Restitution': the normal/tangential split of a surface impact with the tangential velocity unchanged and the normal velocity ratio fixed by the coefficient of restitution