Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A declared rocket check: initial mass 3 kg, loss rate 1 kg s−1 and relative exhaust speed 2 m s−1 give v=ueln⁡(m0/m)n and show that (mv)′=F fails

Physical scope

A declared-data check of the open-body material accounting: a body of initial mass m0=3 kg losing mass at r0=1 kg s−1 has m(t)=m0−r0t. With no external force and ejecta of relative speed ue=2 m s−1 opposite a fixed unit direction n, its velocity from rest is v(t)=ueln⁡(m0/m(t))n. It satisfies the material balance identities and violates the naive closed-system law (mv)′=F; the example verifies the identities, the thrust 2 N and the failure of the naive law on declared model data. It reports no measurement, no engine data and no empirical comparison.

Example

Declared model data. Adopt the open-body material accounting of Adopted impact and open-mass extensions of the force branch: the isolated reciprocal impulse model, the collinear restitution contact law and the open-body material accounting clause (iii) with, on the open interval I=(−12 s,52 s) containing the initial time 0, set m0:=3 kg, r0:=1 kg s−1, and m(t):=m0−r0t,F≡0,rin≡0,rout≡r0,wout(t):=v(t)−ue n, with a fixed unit vector n, ue:=2 m s−1, and initial velocity v(0)=0. The ejecta therefore leave with the body's velocity reduced by the constant exhaust speed ue along n. Set q:=t/(1 s), the dimensionless numerical time, so m(t)=(3−q) kg. Primes denote differentiation with respect to physical frame time t, read in seconds.

Assertions to check. The balance identities hold with v(t)=ueln⁡m0m(t) n=2ln⁡33−q n m s−1(t∈I), the thrust is routue=2 N along n, and the naive closed-system law (mv)′=F fails: it would force v≡0 on I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The declared maps m,F,rin,rout,wout and the vocabulary of Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2algebra

Mass identity: m′=−r0=rin−rout on I, in kg s−1. Since −1/2<q<5/2, m(t)=(3−q) kg>0, so the first balance identity and the positive-mass condition hold.

2.1step 1.1givenL2algebra

Velocity candidate: define v(t):=ueln⁡(m0/m(t))n. By [L2] and m′=−r0, ddtln⁡(m0/m(t))=r0/m(t), so v′(t)=uer0n/m(t), with acceleration units m s−2, and v(0)=ueln⁡1⋅n=0. The logarithm acts on the positive dimensionless ratio m0/m(t).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1algebra

Strong form: mv′=r0uen, while F+rin(win−v)−rout(wout−v)=−r0((v−uen)−v)=r0uen. Thus the derived law holds with thrust r0ue=2 N along n.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1L1L2algebra

Material identities: the product rule gives (mv)′=m′v+mv′=−r0v+r0uen=−r0wout=F+rinwin−routwout. Along with step 1.1 this verifies both balance identities of [L1], with every term in this momentum-rate identity having force units.

5.1step 4.1L1L2algebra

Failure of the naive law: (mv)′=F≡0 would make mv constant and, since m(0)v(0)=0 and m>0, would force v≡0 by [L2]. But the computed v(t) is nonzero for 0<t<2 s; at t=2 s, (mv)′=(2−2ln⁡3)n N≈−0.197n N≠F. Hence the naive law fails for this open body, as Consequences of the adopted impact and open-mass models: continuity of total momentum, the smooth-force exclusion, the restitution solution with ΔK=−1−e22μ∥v2−−v1−∥22, and the open-body and rocket laws clause 6(b) records.

6.1step 5.1L1L2algebra∎

Tsiolkovsky value: at t=1 s, q=1, m=2 kg and v=2ln⁡(3/2)n m s−1≈0.8109n m s−1. The momentum is approximately 1.6219n kg m s−1, whereas the naive law gives zero. These values come from the exact logarithm before rounding; all are declared model computations, with no measurement or empirical inference.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources