How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unit restoration and scale checks for the two-rotor KAM statement: the scaling identities at , the physical angular frequencies, the exclusion of rational frequency labels, and the equal-rescaling invariance
A declared-data check of the units and labels in the page's two-rotor KAM theorem: with moment of inertia 1 kg m^2 and energy scale 1 J the scaling constants are J0=1 kg m^2 s^-1, t0=1 s and omega0=1 s^-1; the physical and dimensionless Hamilton equations correspond exactly; a surviving torus with dimensionless label nu carries physical angular frequencies omega0 nu_i; every rational label of the frequency cube is excluded from the Diophantine set; and equal rescaling of inertia and energy leaves the dimensionless model and the threshold unchanged. The constant c in the smallness condition is not numerically evaluated and no measured value is asserted.
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), as in the cited two-rotor KAM theorem.
Declared model data. Take the two-rotor model of The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope with so that , and .
Assertions to check. (i) The dimensions , , , and (Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework). (ii) With , the physical Hamilton equations , are equivalent to , . (iii) A surviving torus with dimensionless label carries the physical angular frequencies , here . (iv) Every rational label in the cube is excluded from for every and . (v) Replacing by with leaves , the dimensionless model and the smallness condition unchanged, while rescaling by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the declared data , and the scaling constants ; the frequency cube and the Diophantine set of The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope.
The two-rotor KAM statement and its scaling (The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope): the physical Hamiltonian is with and ; under , it becomes , and each surviving torus carries in its torus parameter, with the physical angle given by the embedding.
Diophantine labels (Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels): a frequency is -Diophantine exactly when for every nonzero integer vector .
Verification
Dimensions: the physical Hamiltonian has and with dimensionless; has (Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework). With the declared values, , , .
Scaling of the equations, first equation: with and the chain rule gives and ; substituting into and using yields , that is the dimensionless equation .
Rational labels are non-Diophantine: let with integers and . If , choose ; otherwise set ; in either case , so by [L2]. Hence the Diophantine set of the theorem contains no rational point of the cube; the positive measure it retains is carried by irrational labels.
Scaling of the equations, second equation: substituting into gives ; since , this is equivalent to , the dimensionless Hamilton equation of the potential . With the declared values and the substitution is an identity.
Physical frequencies: by [L1] a surviving torus with label carries in its torus parameter; the physical angle is its embedded angular component; with the components are the physical angular frequencies, of dimension as in step 1.1.
Equal rescaling: replace by , ; then is unchanged, is multiplied by and is unchanged, so the dimensionless Hamiltonian, the frequency cube, the Diophantine set and the smallness condition are all unchanged, while the physical momenta are rescaled by . The constant of the theorem is not numerically evaluated in this check; only the exact scaling behaviour is asserted.
Remarks
-
What this check does not do. It verifies dimensions, the scaling correspondence and the exclusion of rational labels; it does not evaluate the KAM constant , does not certify any particular pair and does not assert that any laboratory rotor realizes the model. Those would require the numerical computation of the theorem's constant and a separate apparatus model.
-
Why rational labels are worth recording. The frequency cube is full of rational labels, so the positive-measure conclusion of The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope concerns an open-ended irrational set; the check makes the Diophantine condition concrete by exhibiting the exact obstruction for rational labels.
Depends on
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope
Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels
Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Jürgen Pöschel, A Lecture on the Classical KAM Theorem (version 1.3, 2009; arXiv:0908.2234), §1: the action-angle formulation, the twist condition and the Diophantine frequency condition of the analytic KAM theorem
- Rafael de la Llave, A Tutorial on KAM Theory (expanded version of the Seattle 1999 lectures; complete text), §3.3 and §6.1: Diophantine frequency sets, resonant slabs and the standard examples of non-Diophantine labels
- Gerald Sussman and Jack Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., §1.5 and §4.6: dimensions of action-angle data and the requirement of a precise KAM statement