Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unit restoration and scale checks for the two-rotor KAM statement: the scaling identities at I=E0=1, the physical angular frequencies, the exclusion of rational frequency labels, and the equal-rescaling invariance

Physical scope

A declared-data check of the units and labels in the page's two-rotor KAM theorem: with moment of inertia 1 kg m^2 and energy scale 1 J the scaling constants are J0=1 kg m^2 s^-1, t0=1 s and omega0=1 s^-1; the physical and dimensionless Hamilton equations correspond exactly; a surviving torus with dimensionless label nu carries physical angular frequencies omega0 nu_i; every rational label of the frequency cube is excluded from the Diophantine set; and equal rescaling of inertia and energy leaves the dimensionless model and the threshold unchanged. The constant c in the smallness condition is not numerically evaluated and no measured value is asserted.

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), as in the cited two-rotor KAM theorem.

Declared model data. Take the two-rotor model of The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope with I:=1 kg m2,E0:=1 J,ε dimensionless, so that J0=IE0=1 kg m2 s−1, t0=J0/E0=1 s and ω0=E0/I=1 s−1.

Assertions to check. (i) The dimensions [Hphys]=J, [Πi]=kg m2 s−1, [I]=kg m2, [ε]=1 and [ω0]=s−1 (Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework). (ii) With Ii=Πi/J0, s=t/t0 the physical Hamilton equations θ˙i=Πi/I, Π˙i=E0εsin⁡θicos⁡θ3−i are equivalent to θi′=Ii, Ii′=εsin⁡ϑicos⁡ϑ3−i. (iii) A surviving torus with dimensionless label ν carries the physical angular frequencies ω0νi, here νi s−1. (iv) Every rational label in the cube C∗ is excluded from Ωα,τ for every α>0 and τ>1. (v) Replacing (I,E0) by (λI,λE0) with λ>0 leaves ω0, the dimensionless model and the smallness condition unchanged, while rescaling J0 by λ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the declared data I=1 kg m2, E0=1 J and the scaling constants J0,t0,ω0; the frequency cube C∗ and the Diophantine set Ωα,τ of The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope.

[L1]

The two-rotor KAM statement and its scaling (The two-rotor model: a positive-measure family of invariant Lagrangian tori with Diophantine frequencies for sufficiently small coupling, with the explicit units and the stated scope): the physical Hamiltonian is Π12/(2I)+Π22/(2I)+E0εcos⁡θ1cos⁡θ2 with J02=IE0 and t0=J0/E0; under Ii=Πi/J0, s=t/t0 it becomes 12(I12+I22)+εcos⁡ϑ1cos⁡ϑ2, and each surviving torus carries φ(t)=φ0+ω0νt in its torus parameter, with the physical angle given by the embedding.

[L2]

Diophantine labels (Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels): a frequency ν is (α,τ)-Diophantine exactly when ∣k⋅ν∣≥α∣k∣1−τ for every nonzero integer vector k.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

Dimensions: the physical Hamiltonian has [Πi2/I]=kg2m4s−2/(kg m2)=kg m2 s−2=J and [E0ε]=1⋅J with ε dimensionless; ω0=E0/I has [ω0]=kg m2 s−2/(kg m2)=s−1 (Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework). With the declared values, J0=1 kg m2 s−1, t0=1 s, ω0=1 s−1.

1.2givenL1algebra

Scaling of the equations, first equation: with Πi=J0Ii and t=t0s the chain rule gives θ˙i=t0−1θi′ and Π˙i=t0−1J0Ii′; substituting into θ˙i=Πi/I and using J0t0=I yields t0−1θi′=J0Ii/I=Ii/t0, that is the dimensionless equation θi′=Ii.

1.3givenL2algebra

Rational labels are non-Diophantine: let ν=(p1/q,p2/q)∈C∗ with integers p1,p2 and q≥1. If p1=p2=0, choose k=(1,0); otherwise set k:=(p2,−p1)≠0; in either case k⋅ν=0<α∣k∣1−τ, so ν∉Ωα,τ by [L2]. Hence the Diophantine set of the theorem contains no rational point of the cube; the positive measure it retains is carried by irrational labels.

2.1step 1.2givenL1algebra

Scaling of the equations, second equation: substituting into Π˙i=E0εsin⁡θicos⁡θ3−i gives t0−1J0Ii′=E0εsin⁡θicos⁡θ3−i; since J0/t0=J0E0/J0=E0, this is equivalent to Ii′=εsin⁡θicos⁡θ3−i, the dimensionless Hamilton equation of the potential εcos⁡ϑ1cos⁡ϑ2. With the declared values J0/t0=1 J and E0=1 J the substitution is an identity.

2.2step 1.1givenL1algebra

Physical frequencies: by [L1] a surviving torus with label ν carries φ(t)=φ0+ω0νt in its torus parameter; the physical angle is its embedded angular component; with ω0=1 s−1 the components ω0νi=νi s−1 are the physical angular frequencies, of dimension s−1 as in step 1.1.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2givenL1algebra∎

Equal rescaling: replace (I,E0) by (λI,λE0), λ>0; then ω0=E0/I is unchanged, J0=IE0 is multiplied by λ and t0=J0/E0 is unchanged, so the dimensionless Hamiltonian, the frequency cube, the Diophantine set and the smallness condition are all unchanged, while the physical momenta Πi=J0Ii are rescaled by λ. The constant c of the theorem is not numerically evaluated in this check; only the exact scaling behaviour is asserted.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources