How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact ideal-gas canonical and grand laws
Finite-N monatomic classical ideal gas in a bounded position region, with a countable grand-canonical number law; excludes quantum exchange and empirical validation.
Example
Let , position volume , particle mass , fixed action reference , and . For with position region of volume and reference , put Then , and . With chemical potential , set . The grand normalizer and particle law are Conditioned on , the phase state is the canonical one above. These exact identities concern the adopted finite classical preparation. The component factorization is stated in labelled momentum coordinates on the symmetric lift; each single-coordinate marginal is the law of a uniformly selected degree of freedom, while permutation-invariant sums and averages are the quotient observables.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ideal Hamiltonian and phase reference, positive temperature, finite position volume, canonical and grand preparations, and the local moment envelopes needed for response derivatives.
The canonical and grand probability laws are the adopted preparations; their response identities apply under the local exponential envelopes (Canonical energy and fluctuation responses, Grand responses in beta and chemical potential).
, , and the position domain has volume ; , and follow SI quantities and unit conventions.
On compact positive intervals, Gaussian polynomial moments are bounded by integrable Gaussian tails; on compact sets, the grand factorial series with any fixed polynomial factor in converges uniformly.
The Gaussian integral proves . For each , the linear diffeomorphism has Jacobian , giving the local scaling .
Verification
Given: [A1]–[A3] and the Gaussian and response interfaces [F1].
Separate the position and momentum integrals and apply [F1] in each of the momentum coordinates. This gives The position density is uniform on the region and each momentum factor is a centered Gaussian of variance .
For in a compact interval , the factors for are bounded by a constant times , since is bounded for ; the latter has a finite Gaussian integral by [F1]. Thus [A3] verifies the canonical response theorem's envelope, which gives , , and the chain rule gives .
The grand sum has sector weight , so its exponential series gives and . Summing the shifted series gives and , hence .
On a compact set, is bounded by some . For each fixed , the ratio of successive terms in tends to zero, uniformly once is large; therefore the series converges uniformly. Combined with the Gaussian bound in step 2.1, this verifies the grand theorem's energy-number envelope. Applying its response identity gives . Within each number sector, dividing the sector Boltzmann density by its sector probability cancels the grand factor, leaving precisely the canonical conditional phase law.
Remarks
The action reference keeps a length and dimensionless. No quantum degeneracy criterion or experimental comparison is included.