How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Classical configuration, phase and reference spaces — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Classical configuration, phase and reference spaces
- Cm Math Canonical
- Cm Math Geometry
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework, quantities and geometry
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hamiltonian Mechanics and Completely Integrable Systems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Metrization: Urysohn, Nagata–Smirnov, Bing, Smirnov
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Mixture Dynamics And Shells
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symplectic Manifolds, Moser Stability, and Darboux–Weinstein Theory
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Thermodynamic Framework
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These worked examples check finite classical ensemble formulas under the preparations and reference conventions of csm-phase-ensembles. They keep the finite indistinguishable-particle mixing correction, compare shell and cumulative-volume entropy conventions without selecting a preferred one, derive the exact ideal-gas canonical and grand laws, and compute finite isothermal-isobaric volume fluctuations for the declared prior. They are conditional mathematical-model calculations, not measured observations, and do not establish macroscopic ensemble equivalence.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Finite-size mixing and distinguishability conventions
Exact finite-N calculation for two equal ideal-gas compartments at equal temperature; distinguishes adopted indistinguishable-label and fixed-species conventions and reports no empirical observation.
Example
Take two initially separate equal-volume boxes, each containing particles of the same mass at the same , with ideal Hamiltonian . Adopt the classical reference with counting for indistinguishable labels and fixed action reference . Removing the partition while fixing total particle number gives whereas for two distinguishable species with fixed of each, The probability under the final identical-particle positional law of finding exactly particles in each half is , the reciprocal factor inside the logarithm above. The identical-particle entropy change is , hence sublinear in ; no exact zero at finite is claimed. For the distinguishable-species comparison, initially confine species (exactly particles) to the first box and species (exactly ) to the second; after removing the partition, each species can occupy the full volume .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two ideal-gas preparations, fixed action reference, equal temperature and the stated particle-counting convention.
Each ideal gas uses the adopted classical quotient-counting reference when labels are operationally indistinguishable (Classical particle counting and physical observables).
Both states are canonical at the same with the SI temperature convention SI quantities and unit conventions, and the position volumes are initially per side and after partition removal.
The Gaussian integral proves . For each , is a linear diffeomorphism with Jacobian , so . Applying this scaling separately in each momentum coordinate gives the stated product of Gaussian factors.
For a canonical Gibbs density, the entropy identity is , the equality case of the reference-relative Gibbs identity (Reference-relative entropy and Gibbs variational inequality).
Verification
Given: [A1]–[A2] and the counting, Gaussian and canonical entropy interfaces [F1]–[F2].
For particles in position volume , separate the position integrals and use [F1] in all momentum coordinates. For one coordinate put ; integrating over gives , as the boundary term vanishes by Gaussian decay. Thus the mean kinetic energy is . The position law factorizes into uniform position laws. With , the partition function is For equal total particle count before and after, the terms in [F2] cancel, so the entropy change is times the logarithm of the partition-function ratio.
Initially the ratio is ; for two fixed distinguishable species it is . The first ratio exceeds one because . Under the final positional law, the particles independently fall in either half with probability , so the central binomial probability is , the reciprocal of the identical-particle ratio.
For each integer , monotonicity of on unit intervals gives Indeed the lower bound integrates on for , and the upper bound integrates on for , then adds . Substitution for and cancels the terms linear in in , leaving a quantity bounded in absolute value by a constant multiple of . Therefore as .
Remarks
This is a finite mathematical consequence of the two declared counting conventions. It is not a mixing experiment, and the macroscopically sublinear correction does not make the finite- entropy change vanish.
Full ideal-gas shell moments and entropy conventions
Finite ideal gas on a compact flat configuration torus at positive regular shell energy; compares two explicitly defined entropy conventions without asserting which one is physically preferred.
Example
Let integers satisfy . Take a flat one-particle torus , where for a basis of and , and set , of position volume . Use equal masses , Hamiltonian and reference with fixed action scale . For , write . The density of shell measure is where is the volume of the unit ball in . Under the full shell preparation, exactly and each quadratic momentum component has mean . Define the cumulative phase volume below energy by . Choose an energy reference in joules and a positive phase-volume reference in the same units as . The reference is dimensionless, so and are dimensionless and is dimensionless. The shell entropy and cumulative volume entropy have derivatives They differ by at finite ; neither convention is selected by this calculation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ideal quadratic Hamiltonian, finite flat configuration volume, positive regular shell energy, declared reference and adopted shell law.
The reference uses the declared counting convention (Classical particle counting and physical observables), and the full regular-shell law is adopted as in Regular full-shell or finite-band preparation.
, , , and the position torus has volume ; the fixed positive action reference has units J s, the energy reference has units J, and has the same dimensionless phase-volume units as . Entropy units use SI quantities and unit conventions, and the action unit uses Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework. The physical reference is that of [A1]; if shell gradients are used, apply the explicit conjugate-coordinate normalization of Regular full-shell or finite-band preparation. On , and , so is a regular value. For each compact energy interval , is compact because is compact and the momentum set is bounded. Hence the shell is nonempty and the compact regular-band hypotheses hold.
For kinetic-plus-potential shells, the position marginal and component moments are those of Kinetic-plus-potential shell marginals and moments.
Verification
Given: [A1]–[A2] and the shell marginal identity [F1].
In the kinetic shell theorem set , and . The configuration integral of is , so its exact density formula gives the displayed . For each the conditional component mean is , and on the shell pointwise; therefore and its variance is zero.
Integrating from to gives cumulative phase volume where . Thus and . Differentiation gives the two displayed derivatives. Since their difference is , they are distinct at every finite .
Remarks
The individual component moments are coordinate statements for the symmetric labelled lift of Classical particle counting and physical observables. A fixed label is not physical on the quotient, but permutation symmetry makes the component law equal to that of a uniformly selected degree of freedom; the total kinetic energy and its average per degree are quotient observables.
Exact ideal-gas canonical and grand laws
Finite-N monatomic classical ideal gas in a bounded position region, with a countable grand-canonical number law; excludes quantum exchange and empirical validation.
Example
Let , position volume , particle mass , fixed action reference , and . For with position region of volume and reference , put Then , and . With chemical potential , set . The grand normalizer and particle law are Conditioned on , the phase state is the canonical one above. These exact identities concern the adopted finite classical preparation. The component factorization is stated in labelled momentum coordinates on the symmetric lift; each single-coordinate marginal is the law of a uniformly selected degree of freedom, while permutation-invariant sums and averages are the quotient observables.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ideal Hamiltonian and phase reference, positive temperature, finite position volume, canonical and grand preparations, and the local moment envelopes needed for response derivatives.
The canonical and grand probability laws are the adopted preparations; their response identities apply under the local exponential envelopes (Canonical energy and fluctuation responses, Grand responses in beta and chemical potential).
, , and the position domain has volume ; , and follow SI quantities and unit conventions.
On compact positive intervals, Gaussian polynomial moments are bounded by integrable Gaussian tails; on compact sets, the grand factorial series with any fixed polynomial factor in converges uniformly.
The Gaussian integral proves . For each , the linear diffeomorphism has Jacobian , giving the local scaling .
Verification
Given: [A1]–[A3] and the Gaussian and response interfaces [F1].
Separate the position and momentum integrals and apply [F1] in each of the momentum coordinates. This gives The position density is uniform on the region and each momentum factor is a centered Gaussian of variance .
For in a compact interval , the factors for are bounded by a constant times , since is bounded for ; the latter has a finite Gaussian integral by [F1]. Thus [A3] verifies the canonical response theorem's envelope, which gives , , and the chain rule gives .
The grand sum has sector weight , so its exponential series gives and . Summing the shifted series gives and , hence .
On a compact set, is bounded by some . For each fixed , the ratio of successive terms in tends to zero, uniformly once is large; therefore the series converges uniformly. Combined with the Gaussian bound in step 2.1, this verifies the grand theorem's energy-number envelope. Applying its response identity gives . Within each number sector, dividing the sector Boltzmann density by its sector probability cancels the grand factor, leaving precisely the canonical conditional phase law.
Remarks
The action reference keeps a length and dimensionless. No quantum degeneracy criterion or experimental comparison is included.
Exact finite ideal-gas volume fluctuations
Fixed-N ideal gas in the declared dV/V0 isothermal-isobaric preparation with positive external pressure; excludes alternative piston priors and experimental claims.
Example
Let , , , , , , and . Use the unit-Lebesgue-volume shape and scaled coordinates , of Isothermal-isobaric joint preparation, with physical positions . Define the kinetic energy and Hamiltonian by In the adopted joint reference times the scaled position-momentum reference, the weight is . Its normalization is The volume mean and variance and mean enthalpy are The extra one in the finite- volume factor follows from the stated prior; it is not a universal piston correction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ideal-gas Hamiltonian, shape-scaled volume domain, adopted preparation and positive finite parameters.
The volume density is proportional to under the adopted preparation (Isothermal-isobaric joint preparation, inherited by Isobaric volume and enthalpy fluctuations).
, , and the spatial reference shape has unit dimensionless volume; is a fixed positive volume scale. Energy and action units follow Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework; temperature and follow SI quantities and unit conventions. The adopted preparation fixes in m and in J m, so is an energy.
The Gaussian integral gives the unit integral . For , the linear substitution gives ; applying it in each of the momentum coordinates yields .
The isobaric response identities apply under their local moment envelopes (Isobaric volume and enthalpy fluctuations).
Verification
Given: [A1]–[A2] and the Gaussian and isobaric-response facts [F1]–[F2].
Integrating the momentum factors gives [F1]; integrating the unit shape coordinates gives one, while the configuration scaling contributes . Hence Let . Direct integration gives ; integration by parts, with at infinity and vanishing lower boundary for , gives . Thus , and cancels the in the reference; the displayed finite positive normalizer follows.
The normalized volume density is . Applying the same integral formula to and gives and . Subtracting the square of the mean gives . Since , these are the claimed volume moments.
To check [F2], first use fixed sufficient statistics with coefficients . On a compact positive set, choose lower bounds . For , absorbing the quadratic polynomial into half of each exponential gives This is integrable against the full reference : the momentum integral is Gaussian by [F1] and the volume integral is by step 1.1. At any fixed pressure , the statistics satisfy . In a small compact neighborhood of both coefficients are bounded strictly below zero; gives the same Gaussian-volume majorant. Thus the exact local exponential envelopes for [F2] hold, including the kinetic-energy factor.
The momentum factors are independent of . For , the boundary term vanishes at both infinities, and integration of gives . Dividing by the positive Gaussian normalizer [F1] and summing the components gives . Step 2.1 gives ; adding the two finite means proves . The envelope check in step 2.2 also licenses the response identities [F2] for this preparation.
Remarks
If , the normalization contains and diverges. If , its integrand grows exponentially at large and also diverges. Thus the positive-pressure condition is essential.
Sources
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, complete author-hosted lecture-note chapter 2, §§2.2–2.3
- Daniel Arovas, Lecture Notes on Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, complete course text, §§4.3–4.4
- Daniel Arovas, Lecture Notes on Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, complete course text, §§4.2.1–4.2.2
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, complete author-hosted lecture-note chapter 1, §1.2
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, complete author-hosted lecture-note chapter 2, §§2.2–2.2.1
- Daniel Arovas, Lecture Notes on Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, complete course text, §§4.4 and 4.7
- University of Concordia, CHEM 630P Statistical Mechanics Part 1, complete lecture notes, NPT ensemble section
- Daniel Arovas, Lecture Notes on Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, complete course text, §4.7