Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reference-relative entropy and Gibbs variational inequality

Statement

Let (Ω,F,m) be a measure space and let p,q be probability densities relative to m, with q>0 almost everywhere on {p>0}. Define the relative entropy D(p∥q):=∫{p>0}plog⁡(p/q) dm, allowing +∞. Then D(p∥q)≥0, and equality holds exactly when p=q almost everywhere. For arbitrary probability densities, extend D(p∥q) to +∞ if ∫{q=0}p dm>0. In particular, let H be extended-real measurable, finite p-almost everywhere, let β>0, and suppose 0<Z=∫e−βHdm<∞,q=Z−1e−βH,∫p∣H∣dm<∞,∫∣plog⁡p∣dm<∞. For S[p]:=−k∫plog⁡p dm and F:=−β−1log⁡Z, with k>0 and βkT=1, one has D(p∥q)=β(⟨H⟩p−F−TS[p])≥0. Write A for the probability densities satisfying these finite energy and absolute entropy conditions. For every measurable H with the stated positive finite Z, define the extended relative free energy on all probability densities by Fext[p]:=F+β−1D(p∥q)∈[F,+∞]. It agrees with ⟨H⟩p−TS[p] on A and has the unique minimizer q, up to almost-everywhere equality, even when the separate energy and entropy integrals of q are not finite. Moreover, inf⁡p∈A(⟨H⟩p−TS[p])=F. This infimum is attained if and only if ∫q∣H∣dm<∞ and ∫∣qlog⁡q∣dm<∞; in that case its unique minimizer is q. Otherwise no density in A attains the infimum. Products with a zero density are taken as zero on the forbidden set, and densities may be redefined on null sets. These mathematical claims do not derive a physical preparation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Normalized densities p,q, positivity of q on the support of p, and, for the Gibbs identity, finite energy and entropy integrals.

[A1]

p,q≥0, ∫p dm=∫q dm=1, and q>0 wherever p>0 up to an m-null set.

[A2]

In the Gibbs case, H is extended-real measurable, β>0 and 0<Z<∞. The finite formula is asserted for p∈A, meaning ∫p∣H∣dm<∞ and ∫∣plog⁡p∣dm<∞; the extended functional does not require either integral to be finite.

[F1]

The natural logarithm is defined on positive reals and has derivative 1/x (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t). In particular log⁡1=0, and log⁡(ab)=log⁡a+log⁡b for positive a,b: for fixed b, the derivative of log⁡(ab)−log⁡a is zero, and its value at a=1 is log⁡b.

[F2]

In the Gibbs clause, q=Z−1e−βH is already assumed to be a probability density relative to m by the displayed hypotheses; no exponential-family differentiation or finite-valued statistic result is needed for the relative-entropy identity.

[F3]

Entropy and expectations are integrals relative to the chosen measure (Statistical states, densities, observables and expectations).

Proof

Given: [A1]–[A2] and the logarithm, normalized Gibbs-density and state conventions [F1]–[F3].

1.1A1F1algebra

For x>0, set h(x)=x−1−log⁡x. By [F1], h′(x)=1−1/x, which is negative for 0<x<1 and positive for x>1; hence h(x)≥h(1)=0, with equality only at x=1. On {p>0} put x=q/p to obtain plog⁡(p/q)≥p−q. The negative part of the left integrand is integrable: where q>p, writing x=q/p>1 gives plog⁡(q/p)=q(log⁡x)/x≤q, since h(x)≥0 implies log⁡x≤x−1 and (x−1)/x≤1. Therefore its integral is well-defined as an extended real number, and D(p∥q)≥∫{p>0}(p−q) dm=1−∫{p>0}q dm≥0.

2.1A1step 1.1

If D=0, both nonnegative gaps in the last inequalities vanish: q has no mass on {p=0}, and h(q/p)=0 p-almost everywhere. The strict equality case in step 1.1 gives q=p on {p>0}, hence p=q almost everywhere. Conversely, if p=q almost everywhere then the defining integrand is zero and D=0.

3.1A2F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

In the Gibbs case, [F2] and [A2] give log⁡q=−βH−log⁡Z p-almost everywhere, so all terms below are integrable and D(p∥q)=∫plog⁡p dm+β⟨H⟩p+log⁡Z=β(⟨H⟩p+β−1∫plog⁡p dm−F). Since S[p]=−k∫plog⁡p dm and β−1=kT, the middle term is −TS[p]. Nonnegativity and the equality condition follow from steps 1.1 and 2.1.

4.1A2F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

If a density gives positive mass to {q=0}, its extended D is +∞ by definition; otherwise step 1.1 applies after removal of null sets. Thus Fext≥F for every probability density. The density q is allowed here without any energy or entropy integrability assumption: directly D(q∥q)=0, so Fext[q]=F. Step 2.1 gives uniqueness. Step 3.1 proves agreement with the original finite formula on A, without assigning any meaning to an undefined difference +∞−∞.

5.1A2F1F2F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Let Q(B):=∫Bq dm. Positive finite Z implies H is finite Q-almost everywhere: H=+∞ has zero Gibbs weight, while H=−∞ can occur only on an m-null set, since its exponential weight is infinite. Set An:={∣H∣≤n} and cn:=Q(An). Then cn↑1. Indeed the disjoint sets A1,A2∖A1,… cover the finite-energy set, so countable additivity of the probability measure Q makes their partial sums cn converge to 1. For every sufficiently large n, cn>0 and pn:=q1An/cn is a probability density. On its support ∣H∣≤n and log⁡pn=−βH−log⁡Z−log⁡cn is bounded, so pn∈A. Moreover pn/q=1/cn on that support, hence D(pn∥q)=−log⁡cn⟶0. The limit follows from the continuity of the logarithm at 1 supplied by [F1]. Step 3.1 now gives finite free energies F−β−1log⁡cn→F, proving the stated infimum. Equality for any p∈A forces p=q almost everywhere by step 2.1; consequently it is attained exactly when q∈A, which is precisely the two stated integrability conditions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources