How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Harmonic forcing gives an exact error criterion for reduction of order
An exact harmonic-forcing calculation for the adopted prescribed-force ODE. It quantifies the model's absolute phasor-amplitude error for first-order reduction of order and shows that a fixed small tolerance requires small . It is not an empirical frequency-response measurement or a validation of a self-consistent radiation-reaction law.
Example
Use the adopted equation with positive constants and , of units and , respectively, and the laboratory conventions of the bounded-future branch theorem.
A phasor coefficient at frequency is a complex vector , with , representing a real map by the real-part representation
At this representation determines only . Adopt the canonical static convention for the constant function ; in particular the static force below has and . Static acceleration phasors use the same convention.
Let and , with . For any , define , the Euclidean norm of its six real coordinates. The force amplitude has units N, has units , and acceleration phasors have units . Prescribe the real force
where real part is taken componentwise. The bounded-future acceleration has complex phasor amplitude
The first-order reduction-of-order acceleration has phasor amplitude . For , the absolute amplitude error relative to the force acceleration scale is
For any chosen tolerance , this relative amplitude error is at most exactly when
Hence small error at a small prescribed tolerance requires small ; no universal numerical cutoff or experimental frequency response is asserted.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The adopted ODE with , , a complex vector amplitude with and if by the canonical static convention, and the real harmonic force .
For and bounded continuous , the preceding theorem gives the unique bounded-future solution of . (Runaway and bounded-future branches of the Abraham–Lorentz equation)
For and bounded forces with bounded , the first-order reduction is . (First-order reduction of order with an explicit residual and error bound)
The Euclidean norm on is induced by its inner product; real and imaginary parts and complex modulus are componentwise, and for real . (The Euclidean inner product on , Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, , , and )
Sine and cosine differentiate by , ; the chain rule applies to . (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when )
Verification
Write . The candidate is a bounded real harmonic vector function. Put ; its cosine and sine coefficient vectors are and . By [F4], , so has cosine coefficient and sine coefficient . Thus , and uniqueness in [F1] identifies this candidate with the bounded-future branch.
Differentiating or using its phasor gives . Therefore Since , the displayed error ratio follows.
For , the tolerance inequality is equivalent, by squaring nonnegative sides, to . The nonnegative solutions satisfy , which is exactly the stated bound on . This is a conditional model calculation, not an empirical claim.
Depends on
Runaway and bounded-future branches of the Abraham–Lorentz equation
First-order reduction of order with an explicit residual and error bound
The Euclidean inner product on
Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
, , and
The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when