Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Runaway and bounded-future branches of the Abraham–Lorentz equation

Physical scope

Exact conditional properties of the adopted nonrelativistic prescribed-force ODE for bounded continuous forces: every acceleration solution, the unique solution bounded on a future half-line, and an explicit smooth future force for which that selected branch accelerates before the force begins. The proof concerns the formal effective equation only; it asserts no measured preacceleration, no self-consistent Maxwell–Lorentz trajectory, and no empirical validity outside the stated model regime.

Statement

Use the equation and constants of the preceding postulate, with m,τ>0. Let f:R→R3 be bounded and continuous, and let a solution mean a continuously differentiable map a:R→R3 satisfying m(a−τa˙)=f at every real time. Bounded for a vector map means each of its three real coordinates is bounded; in R3 this is equivalent to bounded Euclidean norm. The vector improper Riemann integral below is taken componentwise, with ∫t∞h(s) ds:=lim⁡R→∞∫tRh(s) ds when that limit exists. Then the integral converges absolutely, and

a∗(t):=1mτ∫t∞exp⁡ ⁣(−s−tτ)f(s) ds

is a bounded solution. For any fixed t0∈R, every solution has the form

a(t)=a∗(t)+Cexp⁡ ⁣(t−t0τ),C∈R3

Here C is a constant acceleration vector with units m s−2.

The only solution bounded on a future half-line [T,∞), for any finite T, is a∗. A nonzero C gives an exponentially growing acceleration branch, called a runaway branch in this item. Moreover, there is a bounded smooth force that vanishes for t≤0, is nonzero for some t∈(0,1), and for which a∗(t)≠0 for every t<0. Preacceleration means this nonzero acceleration before the force begins; it is a property of the selected ODE branch, not an observation about a physical particle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The adopted equation m(a−τa˙)=f with m,τ>0, a bounded continuous force f:R→R3, and the SI laboratory time and spatial vector conventions.

[A1]

The adopted effective model equation is m(a(t)−τa˙(t))=f(t) for all t∈R, with m>0 and τ>0. (The nonrelativistic Abraham–Lorentz equation as a restricted effective model)

[F1]

The real exponential is defined by its all-real power series, is smooth with derivative exp⁡′=exp⁡, and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x)>0. For x≥0, its series gives exp⁡(x)≥1+x. (The real exponential function and the number e by a power series, The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡, The exponential is positive and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x))

[F3]

On a compact interval, the Riemann integral is linear and monotone; oriented integrals obey ∫bah=−∫abh. In particular, if ∣h∣≤Mg and g≥0, then ∣∫h∣≤M∫g, by applying monotonicity to −Mg≤h≤Mg. (Integrable functions on [a,b] form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and ∫ab(λf+μg)=λ∫abf+μ∫abg, If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a), The integral with oriented limits: ∫aaf:=0 and ∫baf:=−∫abf)

[F4]

If a real function is continuous on [u,v], differentiable on (u,v) and u<v, then its increment is its derivative at an interior point times v−u. (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a))

[F5]

For 0<r<R and n≥1 there is a smooth map ρ:Rn→[0,1] that equals 1 on B‾r(0) and has support in BR(0). (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)

Proof

technique · direct; construct the future integral, verify its differential equation, classify the homogeneous solutions, and exhibit a smooth force profile with a strictly positive future integral
1.1givenF1F2F3F4algebra

Put M:=max⁡0≤j≤2sup⁡s∈R∣fj(s)∣<∞. For R>t, put k(s)=exp⁡(−(s−t)/τ) and J(x)=∫txk(s) ds on [t,R]. By [F1]–[F2], J and P(x)=−τexp⁡(−(x−t)/τ) are continuous on [t,R], differentiable in its interior, and J′=P′=k. Thus P−J has zero derivative; [F4] gives P(R)−J(R)=P(t)−J(t), where J(t)=0. Consequently ∫tRexp⁡(−(s−t)/τ) ds=τ(1−exp⁡(−(R−t)/τ))≤τ for R>t. For x≥0, [F1] implies 0<exp⁡(−x)≤(1+x)−1→0 as x→∞. Hence for S>t and R>S, the component tail is bounded by Mτexp⁡(−(S−t)/τ), which tends to zero as S→∞. Thus each improper integral defining a∗(t) converges absolutely, and ∣a∗,j(t)∣≤M/m, so a∗ is bounded.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

For h≠0, splitting the oriented integral at t gives a∗(t+h)=exp⁡(h/τ)(a∗(t)−1mτ∫0hexp⁡(−v/τ)f(t+v) dv). For each component, the average h−1∫0hexp⁡(−v/τ)fj(t+v) dv tends to fj(t): its difference from fj(t) is bounded by sup⁡∣v∣≤∣h∣∣exp⁡(−v/τ)fj(t+v)−fj(t)∣, which tends to zero by continuity. Taking the difference quotient and using lim⁡h→0(exp⁡(h/τ)−1)/h=1/τ from [F1] yields a˙∗=a∗/τ−f/(mτ), so m(a∗−τa˙∗)=f.

3.1A1F1F2F4step 2.1algebra

If a is any other solution, b:=a−a∗ satisfies b˙=b/τ. For each coordinate, the product rule gives (exp⁡(−t/τ)bj(t))′=0. By [F4] its values at any two real times agree, so exp⁡(−t/τ)b(t) is a constant vector. Therefore b(t)=Cexp⁡((t−t0)/τ) after absorbing the fixed factor exp⁡(t0/τ) into C. Conversely, differentiating this expression verifies that every such a∗+b solves the same equation.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra

If C≠0, at least one coordinate Cj≠0; as t→∞, ∣Cj∣exp⁡((t−t0)/τ)→∞ by the lower bound exp⁡(x)≥1+x for x≥0, while a∗,j is bounded by step 1.1. Thus that coordinate of a is unbounded on every future half-line. Step 1.1 shows that C=0 gives a bounded solution, proving uniqueness of the bounded-future branch.

5.1F1F2F3F5step 2.1algebra∎

Apply [F5] in dimension one with r=1/4, R=1/2 and compose its bump with t↦4(t−1/2). This gives g∈Cc∞((0,1)), g≥0, with g=1 on [7/16,9/16]. Set u=(1,0,0) and f(t)=g(t)u. Then f is bounded and smooth, vanishes for t≤0, and is nonzero on a future interval. For t<0, a∗(t)=exp⁡(t/τ)mτ(∫01exp⁡(−s/τ)g(s) ds)u. The scalar integrand is continuous and positive on [7/16,9/16], so by continuity it has a positive lower bound on some nondegenerate subinterval there; [F2]–[F3] make the displayed integral strictly positive. Since exp⁡(t/τ)>0, a∗(t)≠0 for every t<0, before the applied force begins. This is a conditional ODE deduction, not an experimental result.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources