Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

F4 Nodal Normalization Local Index Defect

Physical scope

Pure analytic sheaf-cohomology example on a rational nodal curve; no physical vacuum, singular membrane state, or flux twist is chosen.

Statement

Let C be a compact irreducible complex curve with exactly one ordinary node p (locally analytically zw=0), and let ν:P1→C be its finite normalization, a finite holomorphic surjection, with ν−1(p)={p+,p−}. Give P1 its genus-zero compact Riemann-surface structure and supply compatible Riemannian and Hermitian metrics as auxiliary data for the cohomology comparison. Fix d∈Z, the holomorphic line bundle V=OP1(d[∞]), and a nonzero complex-linear fiber isomorphism ϕ:Vp+→Vp−. Let Qp be the skyscraper sheaf at p with value the one-dimensional vector space Vp−, and define Fϕ as the kernel of ν∗V⟶Qp,s⟼s(p−)−ϕ(s(p+)). Then there is a short exact sequence 0⟶Fϕ⟶ν∗V⟶Qp⟶0, and χ(C,Fϕ)=d,χ(C,ν∗V)=d+1. Here χ(C,G)=∑q≥0(−1)qdim⁡CHq(C,G) when the cohomology groups are finite-dimensional and vanish in all but finitely many degrees; those conditions for these two sheaves are proved below. The two sheaves agree off p. This is a mathematical local index diagnostic, not a derivation of physical node states, a spin structure, or a singular M2 domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the proper nodal curve and finite normalization map, the genus-zero Riemann sphere, compatible auxiliary metrics, the divisor d[∞], and the nonzero fiber identification ϕ in the Statement. Cohomology is sheaf cohomology of the underlying analytic spaces.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is the stated selection principle (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

For a continuous closed finite-fiber map f, the natural comparison Hq(Y,f∗G)→Hq(X,G) is an isomorphism in every degree (Finite Proper Maps Preserve Sheaf Cohomology).

[F2]

For a compact Riemann surface X of genus g and divisor D, χ(X,OX(D))=deg⁡D+1−g, and its H0,H1 are finite-dimensional (The Riemann-Roch theorem on a compact Riemann surface).

[F3]

For a compact Riemann surface and holomorphic line bundle E, Hq(X,OX(E))=0 for q≥2 (Cech--Dolbeault comparison for holomorphic line bundles on a compact Riemann surface).

[F4]

A skyscraper sheaf at p with value an abelian group A has sections A on opens containing p and 0 on other opens (A skyscraper sheaf of abelian groups at a point).

[F5]

Flasque abelian sheaves have zero cohomology in positive degrees (Flasque sheaf, Flasque abelian sheaves are Γ-acyclic).

[F6]

Exactness of a sequence of sheaves is equivalent to exactness on every stalk (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk).

[F7]

A short exact sequence of abelian sheaves induces a long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology).

[F8]

The direct image is defined by (ν∗V)(U)=V(ν−1U) with restrictions inherited from V (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map).

[F9]

The divisor line bundle OX(D) is the holomorphic line bundle whose local meromorphic sections satisfy the divisor order bound (The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor).

[F10]

The compatible Riemannian and Hermitian metrics provide the metric data used in the compact-surface cohomology comparison; they do not change the holomorphic sheaf cohomology (Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface).

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1givenF1F4F6F8construct

The finite normalization is a closed finite-fiber map, so [F1] applies. The direct image ν∗V has sections V(ν−1U) by [F8]. Define the displayed morphism locally at p by taking a section on the two normalization branches, evaluating at p+ and p−, and taking their difference in Vp− after applying ϕ. The node has two distinct branch germs; in a local frame of V, their values can be assigned independently. Setting the plus-branch germ to zero and choosing the minus-branch germ arbitrarily proves that the map on the stalk at p is surjective. At every q≠p, the target stalk is zero. Its kernel stalk at p is exactly the pairs with matching values, and away from p it is all of (ν∗V)q. Thus the stalk sequence is exact, and [F6] makes the displayed sequence of sheaves short exact.

2.1A1F1F2F3F9F10step 1.1

Put G=ν∗V. By [F1], Hq(C,G)≅Hq(P1,V) for every q. The line V=OP1(d[∞]) is the divisor line bundle of [F9], and the auxiliary metrics of [F10] meet the comparison hypotheses. Apply [F2] to D=d[∞] on the genus-zero sphere to get χ(C,G)=d+1, with H0(C,G) and H1(C,G) finite-dimensional. By [F3], Hq(C,G)=0 for q≥2. The restrictions of Fϕ and G agree on C∖{p} because Qp is zero there.

3.1A1F2F3F4F5F7step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The restriction maps of Qp are either the identity on Vp− or the map to zero, so they are surjective; hence Qp is flasque. Its global sections form the one-dimensional fiber Vp−, and [F5] gives Hq(C,Qp)=0 for q>0. The long exact sequence [F7], using [F3], yields 0→H0(C,Fϕ)→H0(C,G)→Vp−→H1(C,Fϕ)→H1(C,G)→0 and Hq(C,Fϕ)=0 for q≥2. The two displayed cohomology groups of Fϕ are finite-dimensional because the other terms are finite-dimensional by [F2]. Alternating dimensions in this exact sequence give χ(C,Fϕ)=χ(C,G)−dim⁡Vp−=(d+1)−1=d. This numerical defect is conditional on the chosen matching sheaf and makes no claim that it is a physical sector.

Diagram

0FÁº¤VQp0s7!s(p¡)¡Á(s(p+))

The middle arrow is the branch-evaluation difference defined in the Statement; the first arrow includes its kernel. The row records the short exact sequence proved at every stalk in step 1.1. Exactness follows from that local proof, not from the diagram.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources