Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exterior sphere Stokes solution, force and uniqueness — formal worked field

Example

Assume the indexed axiom of countable choice ACω: for every sequence (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets there is a function f on N with f(n)∈Xn for every n. Take a=μ=ρ0=1, p∞=0, and U=ez=(0,0,1) on r>1. With s=z, the exact field and pressure are

u=A(r)ez+B(r)zx,A(r)=1−34r−14r3,B(r)=−34r3+34r5,p=−3z2r3.

It has zero velocity on the unit sphere, tends uniformly to ez, and its formal stress resultant with n=x is 6πez. The theorem's uniqueness conclusion applies among fields in its stated uniform decay class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω as formulated in the Example, and work on the exterior r>1 with constant parameters and far-field/boundary data in [A1]. This supplies the axiom used in the supplier's bounded-annulus proof.

[A1]

Assume ACω as formulated in the Example. Set a=μ=ρ0=1, ν=1, p∞=0, U=ez, with no-slip trace u=0 at r=1 and uniform limits u→ez, p→0.

[F1]

Exterior sphere Stokes solution, force and decay-class uniqueness: for arbitrary a,μ,ρ0>0 and U, the stated explicit exterior Stokes field has zero sphere trace, constant far field, formal resultant 6πμaU, and is unique in the explicitly stated decay class, assuming ACω for the annular divergence theorem.

Verification

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Under [A1], s=U⋅x=z and the general coefficients in [F1] reduce to the displayed A,B,p. At r=1, A=1−3/4−1/4=0 and B=−3/4+3/4=0, so u=0. As r→∞, A→1 and Bzx=O(r−1) uniformly because ∣z∣∣x∣≤r2 and B=O(r−3); hence u→ez.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The constants meet the positivity and regularity hypotheses of [F1], and [A1] supplies its ACω hypothesis. Its exact resultant specializes to 6π(1)(1)ez=6πez, and its uniqueness statement applies to every competing classical solution with the same data and decay bounds. This is a Stokes-model conclusion, not a finite-Reynolds-number estimate.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels