How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exterior sphere Stokes solution, force and uniqueness — formal worked field
Example
Assume the indexed axiom of countable choice : for every sequence of nonempty sets there is a function on with for every . Take , , and on . With , the exact field and pressure are
It has zero velocity on the unit sphere, tends uniformly to , and its formal stress resultant with is . The theorem's uniqueness conclusion applies among fields in its stated uniform decay class.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume as formulated in the Example, and work on the exterior with constant parameters and far-field/boundary data in [A1]. This supplies the axiom used in the supplier's bounded-annulus proof.
Assume as formulated in the Example. Set , , , , with no-slip trace at and uniform limits , .
Exterior sphere Stokes solution, force and decay-class uniqueness: for arbitrary and , the stated explicit exterior Stokes field has zero sphere trace, constant far field, formal resultant , and is unique in the explicitly stated decay class, assuming for the annular divergence theorem.
Verification
Under [A1], and the general coefficients in [F1] reduce to the displayed . At , and , so . As , and uniformly because and ; hence .
The constants meet the positivity and regularity hypotheses of [F1], and [A1] supplies its hypothesis. Its exact resultant specializes to , and its uniqueness statement applies to every competing classical solution with the same data and decay bounds. This is a Stokes-model conclusion, not a finite-Reynolds-number estimate.