How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exterior sphere Stokes solution, force and decay-class uniqueness
Statement
Assume . Let , , , and . On the exterior domain put and define
This field is up to the spherical boundary from the exterior, is , at , and uniformly in direction as . It satisfies the steady Stokes system , on . For on , put and form the stress . The formal resultant with this sphere orientation is
Moreover, among classical pairs satisfying the same Stokes system on , the same zero boundary velocity and far-field limits, and the uniform decay conditions , , , this pair is unique. Here the velocity is and pressure locally up to , the displayed bounds hold uniformly in direction, and pressure is normalized by its limit . The claim is for the Stokes equations only; it gives no finite-Reynolds-number error bound or exterior Navier–Stokes existence result. Under SI interpretation, are in metres, in metres per second, in kilograms per cubic metre, in pascal-seconds, in square metres per second, in pascals, and the resultant in newtons.
Statement references
Iain W. Stewart, MIT 8.09/8.309, Chapter 6, §6.8
David Tong, Fluid Mechanics lecture notes, Chapter 2, §§3.4.1–3.4.2
Cartesian derivative, Stokes-system, and stress conventions: Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Use the sphere, constants, fields, boundary values, far-field limits, regularity and uniform decay conditions stated above. All equations and the stress resultant are formal mathematical model quantities.
Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables: the constant-density steady Stokes equation is with ; , is componentwise, and the stress is .
Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain: under , the divergence theorem holds for a bounded Euclidean domain and a vector field on its closure, with outward normal on every boundary component.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume the indexed axiom of countable choice used by [F2].
The first fundamental form, Gram matrix, and area density of a surface patch: the surface density is the nonnegative square root of the determinant of the Gram matrix of the parameter tangents.
Surface area and scalar surface integrals on a regular patch: a continuous scalar field is integrated against that density on the parameter region; area is the integral of the density, and changing values on a content-zero parameter boundary does not change the integral. Vector integrals are evaluated componentwise.
Proof
For any radial scalar functions , direct Cartesian differentiation with and gives and . For the stated coefficients, , , , and . Substitution yields and . Also , so and .
At , , giving . As , and uniformly because ; hence . Differentiating the displayed radial expression gives , and ; these also establish the required uniform far-field limits.
Let be any other pair in the stated class and put , . Subtracting the equations gives , , on , and , , uniformly. For each , apply [F2] on the bounded smooth annulus to and to . The product rule and give and . Substitution into yields , since both inner-boundary terms vanish by .
Write on . There , , and , so the outward radial derivative is . Since the boundary trace is the zero vector, every tangential derivative there vanishes; thus , , and . Further, . It follows that .
For , , , direct differentiation gives tangent Gram coefficients , , . By [F3], the surface density is (also ). The spherical chart is regular in the parameter interior, with the poles and seam on its content-zero parameter boundary. By [F4] those boundary values contribute zero to the integral, so . The parameter change has absolute Jacobian one on each half of the longitude interval, preserves the density since , and induces the antipodal map. Thus the antipodal map preserves spherical area and reverses , so . Integrating the expression in step 3.1 and using gives .
On the integrand in step 2.2 is and the area is , so its integral tends to zero as . The left side is nonnegative and nondecreasing in ; since it equals a quantity tending to zero, it is zero for every . Continuity then gives throughout the connected exterior, so is constant there; its far-field limit is zero, hence . The equation now gives , so is constant, and its zero far-field limit gives .