How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A negative bulk coefficient yields a negative quadratic residual
Example
Assume : every sequence of nonempty sets admits a choice function. Let , , , and ; set , , , and , where is the identity matrix. For define and ; for define . With and one has and , so . Thus a positive shear coefficient alone does not ensure a nonnegative quadratic residual, even though this choice satisfies for every .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The coefficient and matrix choices in the Example and the countable-choice assumption stated there.
Newtonian/Fourier dissipation and exact coefficient conditions: under its conditional Gibbs-residual interpretation, , where .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): is the axiom that every sequence of nonempty sets admits a choice function.
The choices satisfy , , , and ; , , and .
Verification
From the definitions, , so . Since , and for every . Also because .
By [F1] and the countable-choice premise [F2], step 1.1 gives . Since , , and , this value is strictly negative. Therefore the stated positive-shear example verifies the claimed failure of nonnegative residual.