Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A negative bulk coefficient yields a negative quadratic residual

Example

Assume ACω: every sequence of nonempty sets admits a choice function. Let μ>0, ζ<0, T>0, and θ∈R∖{0}; set λ=ζ−2μ3, K=I3, D=θ3I3, and g=0, where I3 is the 3×3 identity matrix. For M∈R3×3 define tr⁡M:=∑i=13Mii and ∣M∣2:=∑i,j=13Mij2; for K∈R3×3 define sym⁡K:=(K+KT)/2. With D0=D−tr⁡D3I3 and Q(D,g,T):=2μ∣D0∣2+ζ(tr⁡D)2T+gT(sym⁡K)gT2, one has D0=0 and tr⁡D=θ, so Q(D,g,T)=ζθ2/T<0. Thus a positive shear coefficient alone does not ensure a nonnegative quadratic residual, even though this choice satisfies xT(sym⁡K)x≥0 for every x∈R3.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The coefficient and matrix choices in the Example and the countable-choice assumption stated there.

[F1]

Newtonian/Fourier dissipation and exact coefficient conditions: under its conditional Gibbs-residual interpretation, Q=(2μ∣D0∣2+ζθ2)/T+gT(sym⁡K)g/T2, where ζ=λ+2μ/3.

[F2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): ACω is the axiom that every sequence of nonempty sets admits a choice function.

[A1]

The choices satisfy μ>0, ζ<0, T>0, and θ≠0; K=I3, D=(θ/3)I3, and g=0.

Verification

1.1A1algebra

From the definitions, tr⁡D=θ, so D0=(θ/3)I3−(θ/3)I3=0. Since K=I3, sym⁡K=I3 and xT(sym⁡K)x=∑i=13xi2≥0 for every x∈R3. Also gT(sym⁡K)g=0 because g=0.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

By [F1] and the countable-choice premise [F2], step 1.1 gives Q=ζθ2/T. Since ζ<0, θ2>0, and T>0, this value is strictly negative. Therefore the stated positive-shear example verifies the claimed failure of nonnegative residual.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources