How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bootstrap closure and nonlinear stability boundaries — model 2
Example
Let be continuous, let , and be dimensionless, and suppose for every finite that
Use the dimensionless thresholds in the cited continuation contract, with . Gronwall gives the polynomial upper bound . This inequality alone does not supply a uniform improvement: with , and , equality holds. Let for the thresholds in the continuation contract below; then . On the finite slab this example has , , but . Thus the bootstrap implication from to fails on that slab.
Example references
A quantitative continuation and bootstrap contract
Open-closed bootstrap continuation
Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients
Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
Metivier, Chapter 3, §§3.3–3.5
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inequality in the Example on every compact interval; ; ; and dimensionless time .
Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: if continuous on satisfy and , then for nondecreasing , .
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with : derivatives of compositions obey the chain rule.
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then : for differentiable on a compact interval with integrable derivative, .
A quantitative continuation and bootstrap contract: the bootstrap input and strict output are and , respectively, with .
Open-closed bootstrap continuation: the required contract implication must hold on every compact subinterval before the continuation conclusion applies.
Verification
The case is immediate. For finite , set , and on . The given inequality holds there; is continuous and nonnegative, is a nonnegative constant and hence nondecreasing, and is continuous and nonnegative, so [F1] applies and gives . Since , [F2] and [F4] give for ; this derivative is continuous. By [F5], .
For the stated boundary example take , set , and . Then . The function has continuous, hence integrable, derivative , so [F5] gives for ; for , both sides equal . Thus .
By [F3], , which proves the stated polynomial upper bound on every finite subinterval.
Put . Because , for we have and , but . Thus the contract's input condition holds on while its claimed improvement fails there; [F7] cannot be applied from this integral inequality alone.
Depends on
A quantitative continuation and bootstrap contract
Open-closed bootstrap continuation
Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients
Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Métivier, The Mathematics of Nonlinear Optics (2009), Chapter 3, §§3.3–3.5, PDF pp. 23–29: symmetric-hyperbolic existence, stability, continuation and a bootstrap-continuation implication
- Qian Wang, Lectures on Nonlinear Wave Equations (2015), §6.3, proof of Theorem 22, PDF pp. 174–186: continuity method, decay estimates and continuation
- S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel, Kerr stability for small angular momentum, arXiv:2104.11857v1 (2021), abstract and §1.2.1, PDF pp. 2 and 22–24
- J. L. Jaramillo, J. A. Valiente Kroon and E. Gourgoulhon, From Geometry to Numerics: interdisciplinary aspects in mathematical and numerical relativity, arXiv:0712.2332v2 (2008), §§1.2.1 and 2.2, PDF pp. 2–3 and 11–12