Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bootstrap closure and nonlinear stability boundaries — model 2

Example

Let E:[0,Tmax⁡)→[0,∞) be continuous, let E0≥0, C>0 and ϵ>0 be dimensionless, and suppose for every finite t<Tmax⁡ that

E(t)≤E0+Cϵ∫0t(1+s)−1E(s) ds.

Use the dimensionless thresholds A,ϵ,η in the cited continuation contract, with 2Aϵ2<η. Gronwall gives the polynomial upper bound E(t)≤E0(1+t)Cϵ. This inequality alone does not supply a uniform improvement: with Cϵ=1, E0=1 and E(t)=1+t, equality holds. Let B=Aϵ2>1 for the thresholds in the continuation contract below; then 2B<η. On the finite slab 0≤t≤B this example has E(0)<B, E(t)≤2B, but E(B)>B. Thus the bootstrap implication from 2B to B fails on that slab.

Example references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The inequality in the Example on every compact interval; E0≥0; C,ϵ>0; and dimensionless time t≥0.

[F1]

Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: if continuous u,a,b on [0,T] satisfy u,b≥0 and u(t)≤a(t)+∫0tb(s)u(s) ds, then for nondecreasing a, u(t)≤a(t)exp⁡(∫0tb).

[F2]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: log⁡′(x)=1/x for x>0 and log⁡x=∫1xdu/u.

[F3]

Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention: for positive x, xα=exp⁡(αlog⁡x).

[F5]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): for differentiable G on a compact interval with integrable derivative, ∫abG′(s) ds=G(b)−G(a).

[F6]

A quantitative continuation and bootstrap contract: the bootstrap input and strict output are E≤2Aϵ2 and E≤Aϵ2, respectively, with 2Aϵ2<η.

[F7]

Open-closed bootstrap continuation: the required contract implication must hold on every compact subinterval before the continuation conclusion applies.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F4F5algebra

The case t=0 is immediate. For finite t>0, set u=E, a(s)=E0 and b(s)=Cϵ(1+s)−1 on [0,t]. The given inequality holds there; u is continuous and nonnegative, a is a nonnegative constant and hence nondecreasing, and b is continuous and nonnegative, so [F1] applies and gives E(t)≤E0exp⁡ ⁣(Cϵ∫0t(1+s)−1 ds). Since 1+s>0, [F2] and [F4] give G′(s)=(1+s)−1 for G(s)=log⁡(1+s); this derivative is continuous. By [F5], ∫0t(1+s)−1 ds=G(t)−G(0)=log⁡(1+t).

1.2givenF5algebra

For the stated boundary example take Tmax⁡=∞, set Cϵ=1, E0=1 and E(t)=1+t. Then Cϵ(1+s)−1E(s)=1. The function H(s)=s has continuous, hence integrable, derivative 1, so [F5] gives ∫0t1 ds=H(t)−H(0)=t for t>0; for t=0, both sides equal 1. Thus E0+Cϵ∫0t(1+s)−1E(s) ds=1+t=E(t).

2.1step 1.1F3algebra

By [F3], exp⁡(Cϵlog⁡(1+t))=(1+t)Cϵ, which proves the stated polynomial upper bound on every finite subinterval.

3.1givenF6F7step 1.2algebra∎

Put T=B. Because B>1, for 0≤t≤B we have E(0)=1<B and E(t)≤1+B≤2B, but E(B)=1+B>B. Thus the contract's input condition holds on [0,B] while its claimed improvement fails there; [F7] cannot be applied from this integral inequality alone.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources