Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reversing the time orientation reverses the future cone

Example

Let (M,g,N) be a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model) and put N′:=−N. Then (M,g,N′) is again a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold, and at every p∈M the future-directed causal vectors of N′ are exactly the past-directed causal vectors of N; equivalently Cp+(N′)=Cp−(N). In the flat model of The constant Minkowski metric as a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian manifold with N=∂0, the vector ∂0 is future-directed for N and past-directed for −N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold (M,g,N) and its reversal N′=−N.

[L1]

A time orientation is a smooth vector field N with gp(Np,Np)<0 at every p; a nonzero causal v is future-directed when gp(v,Np)<0 and past-directed when gp(v,Np)>0 (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model).

[L2]

For two smooth timelike fields N,N′ the function f(p)=gp(Np,Np′) is smooth and nowhere zero, and on each connected set it has constant sign; where f<0 the future cones of N and N′ agree, and where f>0 they are opposite, in particular Cp+(N′)=Cp−(N) (Two time orientations agree or are opposite on each connected set).

[L3]

A nonzero causal vector is future-directed exactly when it lies in cl⁡(Cp+)∖{0} and past-directed exactly when it lies in cl⁡(Cp−)∖{0} (Classification of future and past causal vectors by a timelike field, Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model).

[L4]

In the flat model with N=∂0, the vector ∂0 is smooth and gp(∂0,∂0)=−1<0 (The constant Minkowski metric as a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian manifold, A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1given

The field N′=−N has component functions the negatives of those of N in every chart, hence is smooth, and gp(Np′,Np′)=gp(Np,Np)<0 for every p; by [L1] the triple (M,g,N′) is a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold.

2.1step 1.1L2algebra

For the pair (N,N′) the function of [L2] is f(p)=gp(Np,−Np)=−gp(Np,Np)>0 for every p; so f is positive on every connected set, and the positive-sign case of [L2] gives Cp+(N′)=Cp−(N) at every p.

3.1step 2.1L3algebra

By [L3] applied in the two time orientations, the future-directed causal vectors of N′ are cl⁡(Cp+(N′))∖{0}=cl⁡(Cp−(N))∖{0}, which are exactly the past-directed causal vectors of N; and symmetrically the future-directed causal vectors of N are the past-directed ones of N′.

4.1step 3.1L1L4algebra∎

In the flat model, N′=−∂0 and gp(∂0,N′)=−gp(∂0,∂0)=1>0 by [L4], so by [L1] the vector ∂0 is past-directed for N′; it is future-directed for N since gp(∂0,N)=−1<0. This is the concrete instance of step 3.1, and it shows that the future/past attribution of a fixed causal vector is relative to the adopted time orientation.

Remarks

Choice convention. The smooth vector fields of this example are the tangent-bundle sections of A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle, whose canonical smooth structure on TM assumes the axiom ACω of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); this example inherits that assumption and uses no further choice principle.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources