How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-mode CCR/CAR and a vector outside the number-operator domain
Example
Let with , and write for its normalized bosonic -particle vector, including . On the one-mode fermionic Fock space write . The one-mode bosonic operators satisfy the CCR on the common invariant finite-particle domain ; the fermionic operators satisfy the CAR on the whole two-dimensional fermionic Fock space. The bosonic number operator from Second-quantized multipliers, joint spectral measure and exact domains is with The Fock vector belongs to but not to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (), a unit vector , the one-mode bosonic and fermionic Fock constructions, and the maximal bosonic creation/annihilation domains.
For the number-operator calculation take , , , and with . Then is one-dimensional, with unit vector , and its one-particle multiplier is exactly .
On one-mode bosonic sectors, for , , and . The fermionic one-mode maps are bounded and satisfy the CAR. Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains
The maximal domains are and . Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains
For the one-point measure space specified in [A1], the second-quantized multiplier is the number operator, acts by on sector , and has the exact square-summability domain stated above. Second-quantized multipliers, joint spectral measure and exact domains
Verification
For bosons, the ladder formulas [F1] give and for every , where the second identity at uses . Their difference is ; linear extension proves on the finite-particle core. For fermions, , , , and . Hence fixes both basis vectors, while ; these identities hold on the whole two-dimensional fermionic Fock space.
The squared norm of is , which is finite: on each block there are terms, each at most , so the block sum is at most and the geometric series of these bounds converges. By [F3], would require . Since for , . The harmonic series diverges because each block has terms at least , so every block sum is at least . Therefore .
By [F2], the annihilation-domain sum for is , and the creation-domain sum is . Each is finite: the th dyadic block of has at most terms each at most , so its block sum is at most ; the shifted series has the same convergence. Thus while step 1.2 proves . This is a domain distinction for the stated operators, not a physical or empirical claim.