Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-mode CCR/CAR and a vector outside the number-operator domain

Example

Let H=Ce with ∥e∥=1, and write ∣n⟩=e⊗n for its normalized bosonic n-particle vector, including ∣0⟩=Ω. On the one-mode fermionic Fock space write ∣1⟩=c†(e)Ω. The one-mode bosonic operators satisfy the CCR on the common invariant finite-particle domain Dfin; the fermionic operators satisfy the CAR on the whole two-dimensional fermionic Fock space. The bosonic number operator from Second-quantized multipliers, joint spectral measure and exact domains is N∣n⟩=n∣n⟩ with D(N)={(cn)n≥0:∑n≥0n2∣cn∣2<∞}. The Fock vector Ψ=∑n=0∞(n+1)−3/2∣n⟩ belongs to D(a(e))∩D(a†(e)) but not to D(N).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), a unit vector e, the one-mode bosonic and fermionic Fock constructions, and the maximal bosonic creation/annihilation domains.

[A1]

For the number-operator calculation take X={∗}, A={∅,{∗}}, μ({∗})=1, and ω:X→R with ω(∗)=1. Then L2(X,μ;C) is one-dimensional, with unit vector e=1{∗}, and its one-particle multiplier is exactly 1.

[F1]

On one-mode bosonic sectors, a(e)∣n⟩=n∣n−1⟩ for n≥1, a(e)Ω=0, and a†(e)∣n⟩=n+1∣n+1⟩. The fermionic one-mode maps are bounded and satisfy the CAR. Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains

[F2]

The maximal domains are D(a(e))={(cn):∑n≥1n∣cn∣2<∞} and D(a†(e))={(cn):∑n≥0(n+1)∣cn∣2<∞}. Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains

[F3]

For the one-point measure space specified in [A1], the second-quantized multiplier is the number operator, acts by n on sector n, and has the exact square-summability domain stated above. Second-quantized multipliers, joint spectral measure and exact domains

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

For bosons, the ladder formulas [F1] give a(e)a†(e)∣n⟩=(n+1)∣n⟩ and a†(e)a(e)∣n⟩=n∣n⟩ for every n≥0, where the second identity at n=0 uses a(e)Ω=0. Their difference is ∣n⟩; linear extension proves [a(e),a†(e)]=I on the finite-particle core. For fermions, c(e)Ω=0, c†(e)Ω=∣1⟩, c(e)∣1⟩=Ω, and c†(e)∣1⟩=0. Hence {c(e),c†(e)} fixes both basis vectors, while c(e)2=(c†(e))2=0; these identities hold on the whole two-dimensional fermionic Fock space.

1.2F3givenalgebra

The squared norm of Ψ is ∑n≥0(n+1)−3, which is finite: on each block 2k≤n+1<2k+1 there are 2k terms, each at most 2−3k, so the block sum is at most 2−2k and the geometric series of these bounds converges. By [F3], Ψ∈D(N) would require ∑n≥1n2/(n+1)3<∞. Since n+1≤2n for n≥1, n2/(n+1)3≥1/(8n). The harmonic series diverges because each block 2k≤n<2k+1 has 2k terms at least 2−(k+1), so every block sum is at least 1/2. Therefore Ψ∉D(N).

2.1F2step 1.2algebra∎

By [F2], the annihilation-domain sum for Ψ is ∑n≥1n/(n+1)3≤∑n≥1n−2, and the creation-domain sum is ∑n≥0(n+1)−2. Each is finite: the kth dyadic block of ∑n≥1n−2 has at most 2k terms each at most 2−2k, so its block sum is at most 2−k; the shifted series has the same convergence. Thus Ψ∈D(a(e))∩D(a†(e)) while step 1.2 proves Ψ∉D(N). This is a domain distinction for the stated operators, not a physical or empirical claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources