Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Circle rotation on the complex projective line

Example

Assume AC. Let T=R/Z act on M=CP1 by t⋅[z0:z1]=[z0:e2πitz1]. For k∈{Q,R}, use the product Milnor Borel model and let u=c1(Lχ)∈H2(BT;k) for χ(t)=e2πit. The fixed set is F={p+,p−}, where p+=[1:0] and p−=[0:1]; the tangent weights are +1 at p+ and −1 at p−. If ST(k) is generated by nontrivial character classes and AT(k)=H∗(BT;k), then restriction identifies

ST(k)−1HT∗(CP1;k)≅ST(k)−1AT(k)⊕ST(k)−1AT(k),

with the two summands given by evaluation at p+ and p−.

Example references

[Compact-torus Borel localization theorem] Borel localization for compact torus actions

[Character classes and localization conventions] Character localization in Borel equivariant cohomology

[Finite-dimensional fixed loci and normal weights] Fixed loci and normal weights of compact torus actions

[Fixed-point restriction and normal weights] Atiyah–Bott, Section 3, printed pp. 7–9

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the circle action on CP1, the coefficient field k, and the product Milnor Borel model.

[A1]

Assume AC, as required by the character-localization and Borel localization suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The character localization definition gives AT(k)=k[u], with u the degree-two class of the weight-one character, and −u is the class of the inverse character. Both coefficient cases are supplied under [A1]. Character localization in Borel equivariant cohomology

[F2]

The fixed-point and normal-weight conventions are those of the compact torus fixed-locus lemma. Fixed loci and normal weights of compact torus actions

[F3]

Under AC, for a smooth action of a product torus on a compact finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold without boundary, restriction to the fixed set becomes an isomorphism after inverting the nontrivial character classes. Borel localization for compact torus actions

Verification

Given: AC and the action and conventions in the Example.

1.1F1F2algebra

A point [z0:z1] is fixed by all t∈T only if one homogeneous coordinate is zero: if both were nonzero, equality [z0:e2πitz1]=[z0:z1] would force e2πit=1 for every t. Thus the fixed points are p+ and p−. In the local coordinate w=z1/z0 at p+, the action is w↦e2πitw. In v=z0/z1 at p−, it is v↦e−2πitv. These give the stated weights and character classes u and −u, both inverted by ST(k).

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

The standard projective line is a compact real two-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold without boundary, and the displayed chart actions are jointly smooth. Thus the hypotheses of [F3] hold under [A1]. Since F is a pair of fixed points, ET×TF=(BT×{p+})⨿(BT×{p−}), so HT∗(F;k)=AT(k)⊕AT(k). Localizing this finite sum gives the displayed target, and [F3] identifies the restriction map with the asserted isomorphism.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources