How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A noncompact variety with a proper fixed component
Example
Let act on by , and give the two invariant affine charts and . Its fixed locus is the proper component , although is noncompact. Let , , choose , and let be the complex-oriented Gysin class of , so . Pull back to by the projection . Compute the intrinsic localized pushforward of ; it is .
Example references
[Proper fixed-component denominator formula] Edidin–Graham, Section 4
[Borel–Moore fundamental classes and proper pushforward] Ginzburg, Section 1
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard complex orientation on and , the stated -action and finite invariant affine cover, rational coefficients, and the character class .
The Borel construction gives , the cap action on Borel–Moore classes, and the complex-oriented fundamental classes. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes
The intrinsic pushforward formula for a smooth variety with proper fixed locus is the finite sum over fixed components divided by their localized normal Euler classes. Noncompact localization with a proper fixed locus
The normal Euler class on a fixed component is determined by the nonzero character weights, and its degree equals twice the complex normal rank. Fixed-embedding BM self-intersection and Euler units
The complex orientation defines the Gysin class of a point from the positive normalized Thom class of its complex normal line. Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles
AC is inherited through the Borel–Moore and Thom constructions; the chosen point and all fiber data are explicit. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles
Verification
Given: The data in the Example.
Each listed chart is isomorphic to , is -invariant, and the two cover . The action fixes exactly when , so is smooth and proper. Its normal bundle is the trivial complex line over with character ; hence by [F3].
Let be the point inclusion and choose a complex coordinate disk about . The complex orientation of its normal line gives the relative Thom class whose restriction evaluates as on the oriented disk. By [F4], is the image of this positive Thom class under excision and the relative-to-absolute map. At the th finite Borel approximation, the trivial -action gives and the neighborhood ; the Thom class there is . Let be its image, first by excision and then by the relative-to-absolute map for , and let be the induced inclusion. The local cap-Thom calculation sends to with coefficient : the positive generator of caps the oriented disk to the positive point class, and the product orientation contributes no sign. Excision therefore gives in Borel–Moore degree . Passing to the stable normalized Borel–Moore groups yields . Since the action on is trivial, .
Both maps and are proper. By functoriality of Borel–Moore pushforward and step 1.2, , because is the identity of the point and its complex-oriented degree-zero class is . This also verifies the stated normalization through the cap-class identification, rather than inferring a Borel–Moore trace directly from cohomological functoriality.
The localization theorem [F2] gives by step 2.1. The target is , containing , although the unlocalized of the point is zero. The output has Borel–Moore degree , matching .