Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A noncompact variety with a proper fixed component

Example

Let T=C× act on X=P1×C by t⋅([x:y],z)=([x:y],tz), and give X the two invariant affine charts {x≠0}×C and {y≠0}×C. Its fixed locus is the proper component F=P1×{0}, although X is noncompact. Let χ(t)=t, u=c1(Lχ∣S1), choose p∈P1, and let h∈H2(P1;Q) be the complex-oriented Gysin class of p, so ∫P1h=1. Pull h back to α∈HT2(X;Q) by the projection X→P1. Compute the intrinsic localized pushforward of α∩[X]T; it is 1/u.

Example references

[Proper fixed-component denominator formula] Edidin–Graham, Section 4

[Borel–Moore fundamental classes and proper pushforward] Ginzburg, Section 1

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard complex orientation on X and F, the stated T-action and finite invariant affine cover, rational coefficients, and the character class u.

[F1]

The Borel construction gives u∈H2(BT;Q), the cap action on Borel–Moore classes, and the complex-oriented fundamental classes. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes

[F2]

The intrinsic pushforward formula for a smooth variety with proper fixed locus is the finite sum over fixed components divided by their localized normal Euler classes. Noncompact localization with a proper fixed locus

[F3]

The normal Euler class on a fixed component is determined by the nonzero character weights, and its degree equals twice the complex normal rank. Fixed-embedding BM self-intersection and Euler units

[F4]

The complex orientation defines the Gysin class of a point from the positive normalized Thom class of its complex normal line. Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles

[A1]

AC is inherited through the Borel–Moore and Thom constructions; the chosen point and all fiber data are explicit. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles

Verification

Given: The data in the Example.

1.1A1F1F3givenalgebra

Each listed chart is isomorphic to C2, is T-invariant, and the two cover X. The action fixes ([x:y],z) exactly when z=0, so F=P1×{0}≅P1 is smooth and proper. Its normal bundle is the trivial complex line over P1 with character χ; hence eT(νF)=u by [F3].

1.2F1F4givenconstruct

Let i:p↪F be the point inclusion and choose a complex coordinate disk D about p. The complex orientation of its normal line gives the relative Thom class τ∈H2(D,D∖{p};Q) whose restriction evaluates as +1 on the oriented disk. By [F4], h=i!1 is the image of this positive Thom class under excision and the relative-to-absolute map. At the mth finite Borel approximation, the trivial T-action gives Fm=CPm×F and the neighborhood CPm×D; the Thom class there is 1×τ. Let hm∈H2(Fm;Q) be its image, first by excision and then by the relative-to-absolute map for (Fm,Fm∖(CPm×{p})), and let im:CPm×{p}↪Fm be the induced inclusion. The local cap-Thom calculation sends (1×τ)∩[CPm×D] to [CPm×{p}] with coefficient +1: the positive generator of (D,D∖{p}) caps the oriented disk to the positive point class, and the product orientation contributes no sign. Excision therefore gives hm∩[Fm]=im∗[CPm] in Borel–Moore degree 2m. Passing to the stable normalized Borel–Moore groups yields h∩[F]T=i∗[p]T. Since the action on F is trivial, α∣F=h.

2.1F1step 1.2givenalgebra

Both maps i:p→F and pF:F→pt are proper. By functoriality of Borel–Moore pushforward and step 1.2, pF∗(h∩[F]T)=pF∗i∗[p]T=(pF∘i)∗[p]T=1, because pF∘i is the identity of the point and its complex-oriented degree-zero class is 1. This also verifies the stated normalization ∫P1h=1 through the cap-class identification, rather than inferring a Borel–Moore trace directly from cohomological functoriality.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

The localization theorem [F2] gives p∗loc(α∩[X]T)=pF∗((h/u)∩[P1]T)=1/u by step 2.1. The target is (ST−1H∗BM,T(pt;Q))2=(ST−1RT)−2, containing 1/u, although the unlocalized H2 of the point is zero. The output has Borel–Moore degree 2, matching 2dim⁡CX−deg⁡α=4−2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources