Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed-embedding BM self-intersection and Euler units

Statement

Let T=(C×)r act algebraically on a smooth separated finite-type complex variety X with a finite invariant affine open cover. Let F=XT, i:F↪X, and νF=TX∣F/TF be the complex normal bundle. Then F is smooth, TxF=(TxX)T for every x∈F, and every normal fiber has only nontrivial T-weights. On each fiber the restriction of eT(νF) to BT is the product of the corresponding character classes with multiplicity. The closed regular embedding i has an equivariant refined Gysin map i!:HjBM,T(X;Q)→Hj−2cBM,T(F;Q) on each component of complex codimension c, normalized by i![X]T=[F]T, with

i!i∗β=eT(νF)∩β

for every β∈H∗BM,T(F;Q), using the normalized Borel–Moore grading and complex orientation. If F is proper, then eT(νF) is a unit in ST−1HT∗(F;Q). Empty components contribute no class, and a rank-zero normal bundle has Euler class 1.

Statement references

[Normal weights and the equivariant Euler denominator] Edidin–Graham, Section 4, Proposition 4 and Theorem 2

[Borel–Moore orientation and equivariant construction] Ginzburg, Sections 1 and 12

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The algebraic torus action, the smooth variety X, the finite invariant affine cover, the localized Borel–Moore data, and the character multiplicative set ST.

[A1]

AC is inherited through the equivariant Borel–Moore, fixed-point, Künneth, and Thom suppliers; the finite character decomposition introduces no stronger choice principle. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles

[F1]

A product torus over C is linearly reductive; its fixed-point subscheme in a smooth variety is smooth and has tangent space equal to the invariant tangent subspace. Groups of multiplicative type are linearly reductive Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions

[F2]

The Borel–Moore grading, cap action, coefficient ring, and associated character lines use the normalized product Borel model. Localized torus-equivariant Borel–Moore classes

[F3]

Complex-oriented refined Gysin maps are compatible with the six-functor exchange, and a complex zero section satisfies the Euler self-intersection formula. Complex-oriented diagonal Thom classes realize exceptional exchange on supports Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class

[F4]

An oriented numerable complex vector bundle has its normalized Thom class; external products and ordered direct sums multiply Thom classes, hence Euler classes. Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles External-product and Whitney-sum formulas for Thom classes

[F5]

For compact smooth F0, the positive-degree ideal J0=⨁q>0Hq(F0;Q) is nilpotent, and BT×F0 is paracompact Hausdorff of CW type. Positive-degree cohomology of a compact manifold is nilpotent The fixed-locus Borel base is paracompact and of CW type

[F6]

Hq(BT;Q) is finite-dimensional in every degree, so the cohomological Künneth cross product identifies HT∗(F0;Q) as a graded ring with H∗(BT;Q)⊗QH∗(F0;Q). Rational coefficient ring and characters of a product torus classifying space Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1F1givenconstruct

By [F1], F is smooth and TxF=(TxX)T. The quotient TxX/TxF therefore has no invariant vector. On an affine open of a connected fixed component the base ring has trivial T-action, so the coaction on the finite-rank normal bundle is linear over that ring. Each of finitely many local module generators has finite character support; the character-coefficient projections are orthogonal idempotents summing to the identity. Their images are locally free direct summands. These decompositions agree on overlaps because the projections are defined by the group coaction. The zero-weight image has zero fiber at every point by TxF=(TxX)T, so νF is the finite direct sum of nontrivial character subbundles. Thus i is a closed regular embedding with the stated complex normal bundle.

2.1A1F2F3F4step 1.1

The complex normal orientation gives the refined Gysin map in the normalized Borel–Moore grading. The Thom class is normalized to restrict to the positive complex-oriented generator on every normal fiber, so i![X]T=[F]T. A K-invariant tubular neighborhood of each fixed component identifies the embedding locally in the Borel construction with the zero section of its normal bundle. By [F3] and the Thom class in [F4], this zero-section operation satisfies i!i∗β=eT(νF)∩β; the degree is lowered by twice the complex codimension c. The result is independent of the chosen tubular neighborhood because the refined exchange and orientation comparisons are canonical.

2.2F2F4F5F6step 1.1

Now let F0 be a connected component of proper F. It is a compact smooth complex manifold, and T acts trivially on it. The Borel normal bundle is a complex vector bundle over BT×F0; [F5] puts its base in the Thom theorem's scope. By [F6], HT∗(F0;Q)=H∗(BT;Q)⊗QH∗(F0;Q). The weight subbundles from step 1.1 have ranks mχ constant on F0. Restricting the Borel normal bundle to BT×{x}, for any x∈F0, gives ⨁χ≠1Lχ⊕mχ. By [F4] and the zero-section definition of Euler class, the restriction of eT(νF) is w0=∏χ≠1uχmχ. Each uχ is a generator of ST, so w0 is invertible after localization.

3.1F5step 2.2algebra∎

Under the Künneth decomposition of step 2.2, write eT(νF)=w0+η, where η∈J0⊗QH∗(BT;Q); restriction to a point detects the degree-zero F0 component w0. By [F5], J0N=0 for some finite N, so z=w0−1η has zN=0 in the localized ring. Therefore eT(νF)−1=w0−1∑a=0N−1(−z)a is a finite inverse. If the normal rank is zero, the empty product is w0=1, η=0, and the same formula gives eT=1. There are finitely many connected components because F is finite type; the componentwise inverses give a unit on all of F. If F=∅, the Euler-unit clause is vacuous.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources