How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The fixed-locus Borel base is paracompact and of CW type
Statement
Assume AC. Let , let use the product Milnor model with its ordinary product topology, and let be a compact finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold without boundary. Then is paracompact Hausdorff and has the homotopy type of a CW complex. In fact, there is a finite CW complex such that .
Statement references
[Paracompactness of CW complexes] Hatcher, Vector Bundles and K-Theory, Appendix, Proposition 1.20, printed p. 36
[Product topology and CW structures] Hatcher, Appendix, Theorem A.6, printed pp. 524–525
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , the product-torus classifying-space model, and compact smooth .
Full AC includes the choice hypotheses of the compact-manifold and product classifying-space constructions. The Axiom of Choice
For , has a countable CW structure whose CW topology is the ordinary product topology; the complete product-topology argument is given in the supplier's proof. The universal complex flag bundle is BT-n
A compact smooth Riemannian manifold admits a finite strongly geodesically convex cover whose finite nerve is homotopy equivalent to it. A compact smooth manifold has a finite good-cover nerve model
Every CW complex and every compact Hausdorff space is paracompact Hausdorff. Hatcher's proof for CW complexes constructs subordinate partitions over the skeleta; the compact Hausdorff case is his Proposition 1.18. [Hatcher, Appendix, Propositions 1.18 and 1.20, printed pp. 35–37.]
Proof
Given: The data in the statement.
If , is a point and the CW and paracompact assertions reduce to the compact manifold . For , [F1] gives its ordinary product CW topology, and [F3] makes it paracompact Hausdorff. By [F2], choose a finite CW complex and a homotopy equivalence . Since is finite, its CW product with the CW complex has the ordinary product topology; hence is a CW complex. The maps and the product of a homotopy inverse with are homotopy inverses, since their coordinate homotopies are continuous in the product topology. Thus has CW type. If , take .
If , the product is empty and paracompact Hausdorff, so assume . To prove paracompactness of , let be an open cover. For each and , choose a product neighborhood of contained in some member . Compactness of selects finitely many whose cover . Then is an open neighborhood of , and is covered by . Paracompactness of gives a locally finite open refinement of . For each , choose with ; the finitely many sets cover , are open, and refine . They are locally finite because a neighborhood meets sets indexed by only those for which meets , a finite set. Hence is paracompact. It is Hausdorff as a product of Hausdorff spaces. The point and rank-zero cases satisfy the same conclusions.