Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive-degree cohomology of a compact manifold is nilpotent

Statement

Assume AC. Let F be a compact finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold without boundary, equipped with a Riemannian metric, and let k be a field. There is a finite CW complex K homotopy equivalent to F, and an integer N≥1 such that Hq(F;k)=0 for every q≥N. Consequently the ideal J=⨁q>0Hq(F;k) in the graded cohomology ring satisfies JN=0. If F=∅, take K=∅, N=1, and J=0.

Statement references

[Finite-dimensional support in the localization proof] Atiyah–Bott, Section 3, printed pp. 6–9

[Finite cover and Mayer–Vietoris route] Dwivedi et al., Section 9.10, PDF pp. 86–87

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a compact smooth Riemannian manifold F, and a field k.

[A1]

Full AC includes the countable-choice hypothesis of the convex-neighborhood theorem. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Every point has a strongly geodesically convex open neighborhood, every finite nonempty intersection of such neighborhoods remains strongly geodesically convex, and its unique minimizing geodesics depend smoothly on endpoints. Existence of geodesically convex neighborhoods

[F2]

Homotopic maps induce the same singular cohomology map with coefficients in k. Homotopy invariance of singular cohomology with field coefficients

[F3]

An open two-set cover has the singular cohomology Mayer–Vietoris long exact sequence, and cohomology is computed as cocycles modulo coboundaries of the singular cochain complex. Mayer vietoris sequence in singular cohomology Singular cochain complex with coefficients Singular cohomology with coefficients The singular boundary operator

[F4]

A compact smooth Riemannian manifold has a finite strongly geodesically convex cover whose finite nerve realization is homotopy equivalent to it. A compact smooth manifold has a finite good-cover nerve model

Proof

Given: The data in the statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4construct

For F≠∅, choose the finite cover U1,…,UN together with its nerve homotopy equivalence supplied by [F4], with N≥1. Every nonempty finite intersection Ui1∩⋯∩Uis is strongly geodesically convex. Choosing a point in that intersection, the unique minimizing geodesics to it give a continuous contraction to the point; by [F2] and the singular cochain definition in [F3], its cohomology is k in degree zero and zero in positive degrees. For a point, this follows from the unique singular n-simplex: its boundary coefficient is 1 for even n and 0 for odd n, so the positive-degree cochain complex is alternately identity and zero and has zero cohomology. The nerve of this same cover has at most N vertices; its usual realization, with one open cell for each nonempty simplex, is a finite CW complex homotopy equivalent to F by the chosen [F4] data.

2.1F3step 1.1inductionalgebra

We prove by induction on the number m≥1 of members of a finite good cover that its union has cohomology zero in every degree q≥m. For m=1, step 1.1 makes the member contractible, giving the claim. Empty cover members have zero cohomology by [F3] and may be discarded; if none remain the union is empty and the assertion holds. For m>1, write A=U1∪⋯∪Um−1 and B=Um. The intersection A∩B is covered by the m−1 sets Ui∩Um, whose nonempty finite intersections are contractible by step 1.1. The induction hypothesis gives Hq(A;k)=0 and Hq−1(A∩B;k)=0 for q≥m; also Hq(B;k)=0 since q>0. The exact segment Hq−1(A∩B;k)→Hq(A∪B;k)→Hq(A;k)⊕Hq(B;k) from [F3] therefore forces Hq(A∪B;k)=0.

3.1F3step 2.1algebra∎

Apply step 2.1 to the selected finite cover of F to get Hq(F;k)=0 for q≥N. Every homogeneous factor of a product of N elements of J has positive degree, so the product has degree at least N and vanishes; expanding finite sums proves JN=0. For empty F, every cohomology group is zero by the empty-space cochain complex, so N=1 works.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources