How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cubic one-field Wess–Zumino F-term potential
A one-field classical rigid N=1 Wess–Zumino model with canonical Kähler metric and cubic superpotential, used to illustrate the F-term elimination formula. No quantum, empirical, or particle-spectrum claim is asserted.
Example
Take one chiral field with canonical Kähler potential and holomorphic superpotential , where has mass dimension one and is dimensionless. In the ordinary complex bosonic sector of the model postulate, take the auxiliary field to be complex-valued; the formal even coefficient space is retained before this restriction. For a smooth compactly supported scalar component , the auxiliary equation and F-term potential are
This is a classical model calculation, not an empirical claim or a quantum effective potential.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-field canonical model and in the Example.
Rigid four-dimensional Wess–Zumino sigma-model action: the canonical Kähler choice has and its chiral auxiliary sector is .
Kähler-metric F-term scalar potential in the rigid model: for a positive Kähler metric, and .
Verification
Given: [A1], [F1], and the polynomial superpotential in the Example.
Differentiate to obtain .
Substitute and the derivative from step 1.1 into [F1]. This gives and , as stated.