Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

SU(2) level k has k+1 torus states

Physical scope

Pure mathematics; no physical premises or physical claim.

Example

For an integer level k≥1, let ℓ=k+2 and take the actual positive-trace ribbon semisimplification of the finite-dimensional integrable type-1 Lusztig divided-power Uq(sl2) tilting modules at q=eπi/ℓ. Its simple labels are a=0,1,…,k, and its normalized matrix is

Sab=2k+2sin⁡ ⁣((a+1)(b+1)πk+2),0≤a,b≤k.

Its unmarked torus state space has dimension k+1. At k=1, its closed genus-g state-space dimension is 2g for every integer g≥0. These are mathematical consequences for the specified tilting quotient, not claims about a physical realization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer level k≥1, the convention ℓ=k+2 and q=eπi/ℓ, and the weighted RT state spaces of the actual root-of-unity quotient.

[A1]

Full AC and its inherited countable-choice consequences are retained from the modularity and weighted RT suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The standard root-of-unity sl2 tilting ribbon quotient is modular establishes the actual positive-trace tilting quotient for every ℓ≥3, with simple labels a=0,…,ℓ−2 and normalized matrix Sab=2/ℓsin⁡((a+1)(b+1)π/ℓ).

[F2]

Modular dimensions follow from exact sewing gives dim⁡V(Σg)=∑a∈IS0a2−2g for all closed unmarked surfaces and dim⁡V(T2)=∣I∣.

Verification

1.1A1F1givenalgebra

Since k≥1, ℓ=k+2≥3. By [F1], the actual quotient is modular and its label set is I={0,…,ℓ−2}={0,…,k}, with the displayed S matrix under the positive-trace convention. For each a∈I, S0a=2/ℓsin⁡((a+1)π/ℓ)≠0 because 0<(a+1)π/ℓ<π.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

The genus-one formula in [F2] has exponent zero and therefore contributes one for each of the k+1 nonzero entries just identified. Thus dim⁡V(T2)=∣I∣=k+1.

3.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

For k=1, ℓ=3 and S00=S01=2/3sin⁡(π/3)=1/2. Applying [F2] gives, for every g≥0, dim⁡V(Σg)=2(12)2−2g=2⋅2g−1=2g. The exponent formula is valid also at g=0, and no limiting or path-integral argument is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources