How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
level has torus states
Pure mathematics; no physical premises or physical claim.
Example
For an integer level , let and take the actual positive-trace ribbon semisimplification of the finite-dimensional integrable type-1 Lusztig divided-power tilting modules at . Its simple labels are , and its normalized matrix is
Its unmarked torus state space has dimension . At , its closed genus- state-space dimension is for every integer . These are mathematical consequences for the specified tilting quotient, not claims about a physical realization.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer level , the convention and , and the weighted RT state spaces of the actual root-of-unity quotient.
Full AC and its inherited countable-choice consequences are retained from the modularity and weighted RT suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The standard root-of-unity sl2 tilting ribbon quotient is modular establishes the actual positive-trace tilting quotient for every , with simple labels and normalized matrix .
Modular dimensions follow from exact sewing gives for all closed unmarked surfaces and .
Verification
Since , . By [F1], the actual quotient is modular and its label set is , with the displayed matrix under the positive-trace convention. For each , because .
The genus-one formula in [F2] has exponent zero and therefore contributes one for each of the nonzero entries just identified. Thus .
For , and . Applying [F2] gives, for every , The exponent formula is valid also at , and no limiting or path-integral argument is used.