Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The round S4 supercharge square and its finite geometric Cartan data

Physical scope

Conditional illustration of the source's N=4 localization supercharge on the round Euclidean S4 and the separate finite-dimensional circle action on its base; it asserts no continuum field-space measure or localization theorem.

Example

Take the adopted massless N=4 model on the round Sr4 with its specified conformal Killing spinors, the trivial rank-seven Euclidean auxiliary bundle Eaux=Sr4×R7 with fixed global orthonormal basis ei, and combined gauge-fixed differential Q=s+δ. Use the spinor/R associated bundle Sϵ from the adopted round-S4 postulate: its fibre is Wϵ=(Δ+⊕Δ−)⊗(VR⊕V0), where Δ±=C2 are the defining Spin⁡(4) factor modules, VR=C2 carries the defining SU(2)R representation, and V0=C2 carries the trivial representation; the product action is ρϵ(s,k)=(π+(s)⊕π−(s))⊗(τ(k)⊕IV0), with quotient convention [(ph,z)]=[p,ρϵ(h)z]. The auxiliary field is K∈Γ(ad⁡P⊗Eaux) with components K=∑iKiei; the source's smooth spinor sections νi satisfy ∑iνi⊗ei∈Γ(Sϵ⊗Eaux∗), ϵΓMνi=0, 12(ϵΓNϵ)Γ~N,αβ=∑iνi,ανi,β+ϵαϵβ, and νiΓMνj=δijϵΓMϵ. For every homogeneous adjoint-valued doublet coordinate X and its opposite-parity partner X′, the source algebra gives sX=X′, sX′=δgauge(ϕ)X+δU(1)(ω)X, δX=−[c,X], and δX′=−[c,X′], with δ2X=δgauge(a0)X and {s,δ}X=−δgauge(ϕ)X. Here δgauge(u)X=[u,X] on adjoint fields and DμX=∇μLCX+[Aμ,X] on adjoint tensor components. For the connection, sA=ψ, its superpartner transforms by sψ=δgauge(ϕ)A+δU(1)(ω)A, and the Faddeev--Popov rule is δAμ=Dμc=−δgauge(c)Aμ, with δgauge(u)Aμ=−Dμu. The generator ω is fixed by vμ=ϵΓμϵ without further rescaling. If α^θ is the chosen lift of this flow to a field bundle, its geometric generator is Lvliftξ=ddθ∣0α^θ∗ξ. On physical and auxiliary fields, δU(1)(ω)=−Lvlift−δR: δR uses the source-ordered RABQ=2ϵΓ~ABϵ~, acting on scalars by RABQΦB and on fermions by 14RABQΓAB, while the auxiliary-index part of Lvlift on Ki is vμ∂μKi+[βv,P,Ki]+ΞijKj, where βv,P is the fixed lift's local vertical coefficient and Ξij=ν[iΓμ∇μνj]=12(νiΓμ∇μνj−νjΓμ∇μνi). On the entire adjoint ghost and multiplier complex, including zero modes, ρgh(ω)=−Lvlift; the chosen lift fixes the zero-mode algebra. The global cohomological parameter is ϕ=−κv, with κv=vμAμ−βv,P+vAΦA, so the source gauge-covariant Lie derivative is Lvlift+δgauge(κv). The affine ghost rule is δϕ=−[c,ϕ]+ρgh(ω)c, with sc=ϕ and sϕ=0. Thus the combined square is Q2=δgauge(a0)+δU(1)(ω): a gauge transformation by the zero-mode section a0 and the selected combined spacetime/R action. In nontrivial gauge-bundle sectors a0∈ker⁡DA∗ is a parallel background zero mode, and the background-gauge functional QΨgf, ghost domains, and zero-mode complex are the sectorwise formal inputs specified for this model; no global gauge slice is asserted. The U(1) base factor acts smoothly on the finite-dimensional manifold Sr4; its ordinary Cartan complex is the invariant polynomial-valued differential-form complex for that base action. This finite Cartan complex concerns forms on Sr4, not the infinite-dimensional field configuration space. The measure and noncommutative regulator extension remain formal assumptions of the adopted model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The round Euclidean Sr4, the selected off-shell supercharge, its BRST gauge-fixing complex, and its smooth U(1) isometry as stated above.

[A1]

Adopted rigid N=4 Yang–Mills localization background on the round four-sphere adopts Q=s+δ and the supersymmetry rules sX=X′, sX′=δgauge(ϕ)X+δU(1)(ω)X, and, for the connection, sA=ψ, sψ=δgauge(ϕ)A+δU(1)(ω)A.

[A2]

Adopted rigid N=4 Yang–Mills localization background on the round four-sphere states δX=−[c,X] and δX′=−[c,X′] on adjoint tensor fields, and δAμ=Dμc=−δgauge(c)Aμ on the connection.

[A3]

Adopted rigid N=4 Yang–Mills localization background on the round four-sphere uses the affine rule δϕ=−[c,ϕ]+ρgh(ω)c and states δ2X=δgauge(a0)X, {s,δ}X=−δgauge(ϕ)X on tensor fields, the same graded algebra on the connection, and, on ghosts, {s,δ}=δU(1)(ω) and s2=0, while δ2=δgauge(a0) follows from their displayed transformations.

[A4]

Adopted rigid N=4 Yang–Mills localization background on the round four-sphere states that its S4 noncommutative regulator extension is assumed but not constructed, and that the regulated measure and contour remain formal inputs.

[A5]

Four-dimensional N=4 SU(2) super-Yang-Mills model: the current model postulate fixes global group SU(2), Ta=−iσa/2, κ=−2Tr⁡2, positive dimensionless coupling g, and connection-normalized chiral fields with canonical fields Φi,can=Φi/g.

[A6]

Four-dimensional N=4 SU(2) super-Yang-Mills model: its on-shell component content is one gauge connection, six real adjoint scalars, and four adjoint Weyl fermions, equivalently one vector and three adjoint chiral multiplets; its extended invariance is adopted as a physical postulate, not proved.

[A7]

Four-dimensional N=4 SU(2) super-Yang-Mills model: in its N=1 decomposition, the carrier specifies one adjoint vector prepotential and three adjoint chiral superfields Φ1,Φ2,Φ3, with the scalar fields connection-normalized before the stated canonical rescaling.

[F1]

Rigid supersymmetric background and localization data: off-shell closure means that Q2 is an explicitly stated combination of lifted isometries and internal transformations on every field; this is separate from existence of a measure or a continuum localization theorem.

[F2]

Borel and Cartan equivariant cohomology for a compact torus: for a compact torus acting smoothly on a finite-dimensional smooth manifold, the Cartan complex is (Sym⁡(t∗)⊗Ω(M))T with the stated contraction deformation of d; this definition does not extend its claim to the infinite-dimensional field configuration space.

Verification

1.1A5A6A7givenalgebra

The actual N=4 supplier interface in [A5], [A6], and [A7] matches this example's stated flat-space input: the global group, invariant trace form, dimensionless coupling, scalar normalization, and vector/chiral component content agree. This check does not prove the supplier's adopted N=4 invariance or identify its flat Minkowski action with the separate curved S4 action.

1.2A1A3givenalgebra

For an adjoint-valued tensor field X, expand (s+δ)2X=s2X+{s,δ}X+δ2X. By [A1], s2X=sX′=δgauge(ϕ)X+δU(1)(ω)X. By [A3], the gauge term cancels with its negative in {s,δ}X, leaving δgauge(a0)X+δU(1)(ω)X.

2.1A1A2A3step 1.2algebra

For the connection, the same square expansion applies to A and ψ. By [A1], s2A=sψ=δgauge(ϕ)A+δU(1)(ω)A; by [A2] and [A3], its BRST rule is δAμ=Dμc=−δgauge(c)Aμ, its mixed term cancels the ϕ action, and its BRST square is δgauge(a0)A. Thus Q2A=δgauge(a0)A+δU(1)(ω)A, using the declared connection gauge action −Dμu.

3.1A3step 1.2step 2.1algebra

On the ghost c, the actual rules in [A3] give sδc=−[ϕ,c] and δsc=−[c,ϕ]+ρgh(ω)c, so the ϕ commutators cancel and {s,δ}c=ρgh(ω)c. On the other gauge-fixing ghosts [A3] gives s2=0, BRST square δgauge(a0), and mixed square δU(1)(ω). Adding the three terms yields the same zero-mode-gauge plus combined circle/R symmetry.

4.1A1A2A3F1F2step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

The element a0∈hP is a parallel background zero-mode section, constant in the trivial background frame; ω generates the selected combined lifted spacetime/R action. Thus the square is the declared gauge transformation plus that combined action on fields and ghosts. The induced circle action on Sr4 satisfies the compact-group and smooth-action hypotheses in [F2], so its ordinary geometric Cartan complex is defined. This use is only on Sr4 and does not transfer the finite-dimensional definition to the field configuration space.

5.1A4step 4.1∎

The adopted contour, measure, and S4 regulator extension are explicit formal inputs in [A4]; the verification above neither constructs them nor proves a regulator-removal or t→∞ limit.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources