Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Borel and Cartan equivariant cohomology for a compact torus

Definition

For a nonnegative integer r, let T=(R/Z)r be a compact torus with its standard product Lie-group smooth structure and period-one basis, and let M be a smooth manifold without boundary, not assumed compact, with a smooth left action a:T×M→M. Work over R and use the chosen product Milnor model ET=(ES1)r and BT=ET/T from the preceding coefficient lemma. Give ET×M the right diagonal action (e,p)⋅t=(e⋅t,t−1⋅p) and define ET×TM:=(ET×M)/T. The Borel equivariant cohomology is the graded ring HT∗(M;R):=Hsing∗(ET×TM;R). For M={∗} this gives HT∗(∗;R)=H∗(BT;R); the selected degree-two normalization in Sym⁡R(t∗) is the isomorphism established in the preceding coefficient lemma.

The quotient map q:ET×M→ET×TM and projection π([e,p])=[e] give the associated-space square ET×M→qET×TM↓pr⁡1↓πET→qTBT Its TikZ source is

\begin{tikzcd}
ET\times M \arrow[r,"q"] \arrow[d,"\operatorname{pr}_1"'] & ET\times_T M \arrow[d,"\pi"]\\
ET \arrow[r,"q_T"'] & BT
\end{tikzcd}

where qT:ET→BT is the orbit quotient. The projection π is well-defined because [e⋅t]=[e] for every t∈T. The square commutes because both composites send (e,p) to [e].

Let t=TeT, with basis e1,…,er and dual basis u1,…,ur. Regard Sym⁡R(t∗) as a polynomial algebra by assigning each linear generator degree two. Use the trivial T-action on this polynomial factor, and the induced left action t⋅α=(at−1)∗α on forms. It is a left action because pullback reverses composition: at−1∗as−1∗=(as−1∘at−1)∗=a(ts)−1∗. The Cartan complex is the graded-commutative algebra CT(M):=(Sym⁡R(t∗)⊗RΩ∗(M))T, with multiplication (P⊗α)(Q⊗β)=PQ⊗(α∧β), where ∧ is the differential-form wedge product and all tensor products are algebraic. The superscript denotes the fixed subspace for the diagonal action, and a polynomial of degree j tensored with a k-form has total degree 2j+k. For ξ∈t, use the library fundamental vector field Xξ(p)=dds∣s=0exp⁡T(−sξ)⋅p. On polynomial-valued forms define the degree-one Cartan operator dT(P⊗α)=P⊗dα−∑i=1r(uiP)⊗ιXeiα, extended linearly. The tensor ∑iui⊗Xei is basis-independent. The Cartan equivariant cohomology in this item means H∗(CT(M),dT); the proof below establishes dT2=0 on CT(M).

This definition does not assert a general isomorphism between the Borel and Cartan cohomology rings. It defines neither equivariant Chow groups nor equivariant quotient-stack Borel–Moore homology, and no rational-coefficient comparison is being used in the real Cartan complex.

Definition references

[Smooth manifold structure] Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts

[Jointly smooth left action] Smooth left actions of Lie groups

[Standard product torus and period-one basis] The standard product torus as a compact Lie group

[Negative-exponential fundamental-field convention] Fundamental vector fields for a left action

[Smooth differential forms] A smooth differential k-form

[Symmetric algebra] Symmetric algebra of a vector space

[Differential-form wedge product] The wedge product of differential forms

[Graded-commutative algebra of differential forms] Differential forms form a graded commutative algebra

[Singular cohomology and its cup product] Singular cohomology with coefficients

[Singular cochain complex] Singular cochain complex with coefficients

[Singular cup product] Singular cup product on cochains

[Singular cohomology ring structure] Cup product is natural, unital and associative

[Exterior derivative] The exterior derivative by the invariant vector-field formula

[Interior product] Interior product of a form by a vector field

[Lie derivative] The Lie derivative of a differential form

[Graded-derivation rule for the exterior derivative] The exterior derivative is a graded derivation

[Graded-antiderivation rule for contraction] Interior product is a graded antiderivation

[Naturality of the exterior derivative under pullback] The exterior derivative commutes with pullback

[Cartan formula] Cartan's magic formula

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a nonnegative integer r, the fixed product torus presentation, the smooth manifold M, and its smooth left T-action.

[A1]

Assume the full Axiom of Choice, as required by the coefficient calculation. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

For the selected product Milnor model, H∗(BT;R)≅Sym⁡R(t∗) with the stated degree-two normalization. Real cohomology of the chosen torus classifying space

[F2]

A smooth left action is a jointly smooth map satisfying the left action law, so each at is a diffeomorphism. Smooth left actions of Lie groups

[F3]

The fundamental field is Xξ(p)=dds∣0exp⁡T(−sξ)⋅p, and ξ↦Xξ is linear as part of the stated Lie-algebra-homomorphism convention. Fundamental vector fields for a left action

[F4]

A smooth differential k-form is a smooth section of ⋀kT∗M; the exterior derivative maps Ωk(M) to Ωk+1(M). A smooth differential k-form The exterior derivative by the invariant vector-field formula

[F5]

Singular cohomology with real coefficients is the cocycle quotient of the real singular cochain complex. Singular cohomology with coefficients

[F6]

The singular cup product is defined by the front/back-face cochain formula. Singular cup product on cochains

[F7]

Singular cohomology with this cup product is a unital graded ring. Cup product is natural, unital and associative

[F8]

The exterior derivative satisfies d2=0. The exterior derivative squares to zero

[F9]

The interior product is pointwise insertion of the vector field into the first slot of an alternating form; hence two insertions anticommute. Interior product of a form by a vector field

[F10]

The Lie derivative of a form is defined by differentiating pullback along the local flow. The Lie derivative of a differential form The Lie derivative of a tensor field

[F11]

The exterior derivative is a degree-one graded derivation of the algebra of forms. The exterior derivative is a graded derivation

[F12]

Contraction by a vector field is a degree-minus-one graded antiderivation. Interior product is a graded antiderivation

[F13]

For every smooth map F, d(F∗ω)=F∗(dω). The exterior derivative commutes with pullback

[F14]

For every vector field X and form α, LXα=d(ιXα)+ιX(dα). Cartan's magic formula

[F15]

The symmetric algebra is the commutative graded quotient of the tensor algebra by v⊗w−w⊗v. Symmetric algebra of a vector space

[F16]

Differential forms form an associative graded-commutative algebra under the pointwise wedge product. The wedge product of differential forms Differential forms form a graded commutative algebra

[F17]

The countable-choice hypothesis ACω requires an indexed selector for every sequence of nonempty sets. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F18]

The fixed product torus is a compact connected abelian Lie group, and each period-one basis vector exponentiates to its coordinate circle subgroup as specified in the local torus definition. The standard product torus as a compact Lie group

[F19]

For the empty space there are no singular simplices, so all singular cochain groups and its singular cohomology vanish. Singular cochain complex with coefficients

Proof

1.1A1F1F5F6F7given

The right diagonal action is a group action by homeomorphisms, so its orbit quotient ET×TM is a topological space. By [F5]–[F7] its real singular cohomology has the stated cup-product ring structure; at M={∗} the quotient is BT, whose coefficient ring is identified by [F1].

1.2F2F3F4F9F11F12F15F16algebra

Pullback by each at−1 preserves wedge products: evaluating on tangent vectors shows that pulling back the pointwise alternating product gives the product of the pullbacks. Thus the diagonal T-action is by algebra automorphisms and its fixed subspace is closed under the multiplication defined by the algebraic tensor-product rule and [F15]–[F16]. Since each polynomial generator has degree two, d raises form degree by one, and contraction lowers form degree by one, both summands in dT raise total degree by one. By [F11] and [F12], each summand is a degree-one derivation because each ui has even degree. Under a change of basis of t, the polynomial basis and vector-field basis transform contragrediently; linearity in [F3] then makes ∑iui⊗Xei basis-independent, so dT is unchanged.

1.3A1F3F17construct

Let (An)n∈N be any sequence of nonempty sets and let F={An:n∈N}. By [A1], choose a function g on F with g(S)∈S for every S∈F. Then c(n):=g(An) is a function on N, including when different indices have equal sets, and c(n)∈An for every n. This is exactly the indexed selector in [F17], so the countable-choice hypothesis of [F3] is satisfied.

2.1F2F3F9F13F18step 1.2step 1.3

Pullback naturality [F13] shows that d preserves the T-fixed forms. For t∈T, the left action law and commutativity give at∘aexp⁡(−sei)=aexp⁡(−sei)∘at; differentiating at s=0 shows (at)∗Xei=Xei. By the pointwise definition [F9], contraction by each Xei preserves invariant forms, while ui is fixed by the stipulated trivial action on the polynomial factor. Both terms therefore preserve the diagonal T-fixed subspace, so dT:CT(M)→CT(M) is well-defined.

2.2F8F9F14step 1.2algebra

On polynomial-valued forms, expand the square as dT2=d2−∑iui(dιXei+ιXeid)+∑i,juiujιXeiιXej. The first term is zero by [F8]. The last sum is zero because uiuj=ujui while insertions into alternating forms anticommute by [F9]. The middle sum is −∑iuiLXei by [F14]. Hence dT2α=−∑iuiLXeiα for every α∈CT(M).

3.1F3F10F18step 2.1step 2.2

Put ϕs=aexp⁡(−sei). The local torus definition [F18] identifies exp⁡(−sei) with the coordinate one-parameter subgroup, so the group law gives ϕs+h=ϕs∘ϕh. Differentiating at h=0 gives ddsϕs(p)=(dϕs)pXei(p)=Xei(ϕs(p)) by step 2.1. Thus ϕs is the flow of Xei. For an invariant form α, ϕs∗α=α for every s; differentiating at zero and using [F10] gives LXeiα=0. Substitution in step 2.2 proves dT2α=0 on CT(M).

4.1F2F3F5F8F19step 3.1∎

If r=0, the sum in dT is empty and dT=d, whose square is zero by [F8]. If the action is trivial, every Xei=0 and again dT=d on invariant forms. If M=∅, the form complex is the zero complex and the Borel construction is the empty space, whose singular cohomology is zero by [F19]. No compactness of M, symplectic form, or Hamiltonian hypothesis was used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources