How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact centered qubit-record displacement variance
Example
Assume full AC and initialize the selected energy-resolved record with the Gibbs law . Use the two energy states of Connected Gibbs jump generators satisfy detailed balance with energies and , where is in joules and is in joules. Let be the rate from and the rate from , both in seconds, with . The stationary mean is . Write and let be a speed scale in metres per second; assign centered pointer velocities . The monitored record displacement has
and exact variance
Consequently
This is a variance of the selected classical record with units of squared metres. The record is not asserted to be a continuous quantum position or an experimental velocity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, a two-state connected Gibbs jump model, its ideal energy-resolved record instrument, and in metres per second.
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function, retained by the finite joint-path supplier.
Stationary monitored-chain transport variance coefficient: for the stationary selected record and any centered real velocity labels, the covariance integral and variance formulas hold.
Connected Gibbs jump generators satisfy detailed balance: for energies , the Gibbs weights obey detailed balance with the stated rates, and diagonal populations follow the two-state generator.
Verification
The Gibbs weights are and : their ratio is , and they sum to one. Thus and . The two-state generator has centered eigenvector with eigenvalue ; therefore and .
Substituting this covariance into [F1] gives
Evaluating the integral gives the displayed finite-time formula. Dividing by and letting gives .