Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Worked relay arithmetic at u=2c and v=(9/10)c: arrival at t=−50/(121c) seconds

Example

Worked computation in the chart x of an inertial frame of an affine Minkowski space (Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives), Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model) with x0=ct for a fixed constant c>0. Throughout this numerical example, xa and L are numerical values in metres, t and Δt are numerical values in seconds, and c,u,v are numerical values in metres per second; units after a formula apply to its numerical value. Take u:=2c, v:=(9/10)c and L:=1 (a length of 1 m), so that u>c, 0<v<c and v>2u/(1+u2/c2)=(4/5)c. Let A and B have affine curves a(t)=x−1(ct,0,0,0) and b(t)=x−1(ct,L+vt,0,0) for t∈R. Their constant tangents (c,0,0,0) and (c,v,0,0) are future timelike since 0<v<c. Emit from A at the event A0:=x−1(0,0,0,0) a signal travelling at coordinate speed u in the +x1 direction, and let B re-emit immediately from the reception event B1 a signal travelling at coordinate speed u in the −x1 direction of B's rest frame; this fixed-speed, immediate, lossless relay is the whole content of the hypothetical model, and no device, signal or measurement is asserted to exist.

(a) The reception time solves ut=L+vt, so t(B1)=Lu−v=1011c s,x1(B1)=ut(B1)=2011 m, and the displacement B1−A0=(1011,2011,0,0) m has interval η=−100121+400121=300121>0: it is spacelike.

(b) Write β:=v/c=9/10, γ:=(1−β2)−1/2=10/19, and let x′=B(β)x be the chart of the inertial frame in which B is at rest (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta)). In that chart the return displacement is (c Δt′,−u Δt′) with Δt′>0, and transforming back with the inverse boost c Δt=γ(c Δt′−βu Δt′),Δx1=γ(−u Δt′+βc Δt′), the condition that the arrival lies on A's worldline x1=0 gives Δx1=−x1(B1), hence Δt′=x1(B1)γ(u−v)>0,Δt=x1(B1)(1−vu/c2)u−v=2011(−45)1011c=−160121c s.

(c) The arrival event A1 therefore satisfies t(A1)=t(B1)+Δt=1011c−160121c=−50121c s<0, matching the closed formula L(2u−v−vu2/c2)/(u−v)2=(−c/2)/(121c2/100)=−50/(121c) s. The displacement A1−A0=(−50121,0,0,0) m is past timelike, so the relayed signal is received strictly before it was emitted in the chart of the emitter; the return displacement in x is (−160121,−220121,0,0) m with η=−(160121)2+(220121)2>0, spacelike.

(d) The computation is an arithmetic specialization of the hypothetical fixed-speed model (signals at fixed coordinate speed u>c in each emitter's rest frame, immediate lossless relaying, inertial motion at v<c, ordinary Lorentz kinematics of displacements); it is a conditional identity about that model and neither asserts that such signals or devices exist nor reports any measurement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An inertial frame with chart x, x0=ct, a constant c>0, the numerical data u=2c, v=(9/10)c, L=1 (numerical metres), β=v/c=9/10, the affine curves a(t)=x−1(ct,0,0,0) of A and b(t)=x−1(ct,L+vt,0,0) of B, t∈R, the emission event A0=x−1(0,0,0,0), and the hypothetical relay: outgoing leg of coordinate speed u in the +x1 direction from A0, immediate re-emission at the reception event B1 of a return leg of coordinate speed u in the −x1 direction of B's rest frame.

[L1]

Coordinate criterion: for events p,q with D=x(q)−x(p), q∈J+(p) iff D0≥∣Ds∣, and q∈I+(p) iff D0>∣Ds∣; J−(p)={q:q≤p} (The closed future cone in inertial coordinates: description, finite sums, and the coordinate criterion for causal reachability, Causal reachability, causal futures and pasts, causal diamonds, and reachability by future causal paths in affine Minkowski space).

[L2]

For ∣β∣<1 the passive boost acts on coordinates by x′0=γ(x0−βx1), x′1=γ(x1−βx0) in the (0,1)-plane with γ=(1−β2)−1/2, its inverse is B(−β) with inverse formulas x0=γ(x′0+βx′1), x1=γ(x′1+βx′0), and B(β) is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta)).

[L3]

The ordered basis ea′:=B(β)−1ea is η-orthonormal, future and positively oriented, so (o;e0′,e1′,e2′,e3′) is an inertial frame; its chart satisfies x′(r)=B(β)x(r) (The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta), Lorentz maps are isomorphisms of determinant ±1 that preserve causal character and permute the cones; the Lorentz sets are groups, Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model, Linear and affine Lorentz maps, and the Lorentz group).

[L4]

A displacement is spacelike iff η(D,D)>0 and timelike iff η(D,D)<0; for a timelike displacement with negative time component the reversed displacement has positive time component dominating its spatial part, giving A0∈J+(A1) by [L1] (Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL4algebra

The reception event B1 has ut=x1=L+vt, so t(B1)=L/(u−v)=1/((2−910)c)=1011c s and x1(B1)=ut(B1)=2011 m; the displacement is B1−A0=(c t(B1),x1(B1),0,0)=(1011,2011,0,0) m, with η(D,D)=−(1011)2+(2011)2=300121>0 and D0>0, so it is spacelike with positive time component in x; this is (a).

2.1step 1.1L2L3algebra

With β=v/c=9/10, the basis ea′=B(β)−1ea is the basis of an inertial frame by [L3], and its chart satisfies x′=B(β)x with inverse x=B(−β)x′, that is x0=γ(x′0+βx′1), x1=γ(x′1+βx′0); moreover γ=(1−81/100)−1/2=(19/100)−1/2=10/19.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2L3algebra

In the chart x′ the worldline of B is constant in x′1, since x′1=γ(x1−910x0)=γ(L+vt−910ct)=γL; the return leg moves in the −x′1 direction at coordinate speed u, so its displacement in x′ is (c Δt′,−u Δt′) for a single Δt′, and applying the inverse formula of step 2.1 to its x1-component gives Δx1=γ(βc Δt′−u Δt′)=γ(v−u)Δt′.

4.1step 3.1L2algebra

The arrival event lies on the worldline x1=0 of A, so Δx1=−x1(B1)=−2011 m, and step 3.1 gives Δt′=x1(B1)/(γ(u−v))>0; substituting into the time component of the inverse formula gives Δt=Δx0c=γ Δt′(1−vuc2)=x1(B1)(1−vu/c2)u−v, and with vu/c2=910⋅2=95 this is 2011(−45)1011c=−160121c s; this is (b).

5.1step 1.1step 4.1L1L4algebra

Adding the two legs gives t(A1)=t(B1)+Δt=1011c−160121c=110−160121c=−50121c s, and the closed formula L(2u−v−vu2/c2)/(u−v)2 evaluates as (4c−910c−910⋅4c)/(1110c)2=(−c2)/(121100c2)=−50121c s, the same number. The displacement A1−A0=(−50121,0,0,0) m has η=−(50121)2<0, so it is timelike, and the reversed displacement A0−A1=(50121,0,0,0) has time component 50121>0=∣Ds∣, so A0∈I+(A1) by [L1]: the arrival is in the strict chronological past of the emission. The return displacement in x is (−160121,−220121,0,0) m because its x1-component is −2011=−220121 m, and its interval is η=−(160121)2+(220121)2>0, so it is spacelike; this is (c).

6.1step 5.1given∎

Steps 1.1 to 5.1 are an arithmetic specialization of the hypothetical fixed-speed relay model with its stated inputs, and no step uses any property beyond the Lorentz kinematics of the boost and the causal classification of the two displacements; the reception of the relayed signal strictly before its emission in the chart of the emitter is therefore a conditional conclusion of that model, not a report of a measurement and not an assertion that superluminal signals or the devices realizing the relay exist; this is (d).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources