How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Worked length contraction of a rod of rest length 5 at speed 3c/5
Example
In an inertial chart let the chart be related to by a boost of speed along the first spatial axis, , so that and (Coordinate formulas of a boost: clock rates, rod lengths, simultaneity and velocity transformation, The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta). Let and let the rod at rest in have endpoints on the worldlines and , with vanishing transverse coordinates. Solving the transition for as a function of gives on the first worldline and on the second, so at every equal -time the endpoints are separated by in the frame . Explicit witness: the events and are simultaneous in (both have ) and separated by ; their -coordinates are and , so they are not simultaneous in but their -separation is . Comparing events at equal -time instead: the events of the two worldlines with are and , the second of which has ; at equal -time the endpoints are separated by , the rest length. Thus the frame assigns length to a rod of rest length at rest in , exactly the contraction of clause (ii) of Coordinate formulas of a boost: clock rates, rod lengths, simultaneity and velocity transformation, and the comparison uses the simultaneity slice of the measuring frame in the sense of Simultaneity slices and rest distance relative to a future unit timelike vector.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two inertial charts , of the affine Minkowski model related by the boost of speed along the first axis with , the number , the two worldlines and at rest in with zero transverse coordinates, and the witness events , (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model, Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives)).
Length comparison (clause (ii) of Coordinate formulas of a boost: clock rates, rod lengths, simultaneity and velocity transformation): two worldlines at rest in with -separation have -separation at equal -times, while at equal -times their -separation is .
Simultaneity relative to a chart is equality of the chart's time coordinate, and the events simultaneous with in the frame are the slice of the measuring frame (Simultaneity slices and rest distance relative to a future unit timelike vector, Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model).
Verification
On the worldline the transition reads , so ; for this is and for it is . Hence at every fixed the -separation of the two worldlines is as asserted.
The witness events: and ; the first lies on and the second on , both have hence are simultaneous in and separated by ; their -times and differ, their -separation is .
Equal -time comparison: on the second worldline, ; setting gives and then , so the two events and have equal -time ; their -coordinates are and , so at equal -time the separation is the rest length .
Conclusion: the frame assigns to the rod the length at its own equal--time slice, which is exactly of clause (ii) of [L2]; the same pair of worldlines has -separation at equal -times, and the witness events show explicitly that the equal- and the equal- comparisons involve different pairs of events. This verifies the length contraction formula and the role of the measuring frame's simultaneity slice.
Remarks
-
Which events are being compared. The two witness events of step 1.2 are simultaneous in and not in , while the two events of step 1.3 are simultaneous in and not in ; the contracted and the rest lengths therefore refer to different pairs of events on the same two worldlines, which is exactly the content of clause (ii) of Coordinate formulas of a boost: clock rates, rod lengths, simultaneity and velocity transformation.
-
No optical claim. The length assigned by is the distance of the rod's endpoints on a simultaneity slice of ; it is not an appearance or a photograph, and no light-propagation or measurement model is involved.
Depends on
Coordinate formulas of a boost: clock rates, rod lengths, simultaneity and velocity transformation
The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta
Simultaneity slices and rest distance relative to a future unit timelike vector
Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model
Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- B. Crowell, Special Relativity, revision 2020-12-10 (author-published undergraduate textbook, 246 PDF pages): Sections 1.1-1.3 pp. 12-28 (vector representation of observer motion, operational radar calibration, time dilation, length-contraction road-trip example), Sections 3.5 and 3.7 pp. 60-68 (four-velocity, acceleration, projection operator), Section 3.9.3 pp. 73-74 (local failure of accelerated simultaneity), Sections 7.1-7.3 pp. 147-151 (Rindler coordinates and nonuniform proper acceleration), Section 8.1 pp. 165-169 (rotating synchronization), Section 9.5 pp. 205-211 (congruences, expansion, Born rigidity); signature (+---) converted to (-+++) and c = 1 formulas converted to x^0 = c t
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997): Chapter 1 pp. 8-16 (inertial frames built from rigid rods and synchronized clocks, simultaneity, time dilation, length contraction) and pp. 26-27 (worldline, proper time (1.97)-(1.99), four-velocity); Chapter 3 pp. 68-71 (proper-time functional)