How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coordinate formulas of a boost: clock rates, rod lengths, simultaneity and velocity transformation
Statement
Let and be inertial frames whose bases are related by a boost along the common first spatial direction with parameter , :
where , with charts , (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition). For arbitrary origins put , the constant translation vector, and write the affine transition as
Then:
(i) Clock rate. The straight worldline (coordinate velocity , the worldline of a clock at rest in the frame ) is future timelike, and the elapsed proper time between is ; equivalently along , where is the coordinate time of .
(ii) Length comparison. For let be the two straight worldlines at rest in the frame through the events with -coordinates and . Then (a) at equal -times their -coordinate separation is , while (b) at equal -times their -coordinate separation is , so the measuring frame assigns the length to a rod of rest length at rest in ; (c) symmetrically, for two worldlines at rest in with constant -spatial separation along the boost direction, the separation at equal -times is . In each case the comparison uses events at equal time in the measuring frame; comparing equal times of the other frame is a different pair of events.
(iii) Simultaneity. If and , then ; in particular simultaneity in the chart is not simultaneity in the chart whenever .
(iv) Velocity transformation. Let be a future causal curve which in the chart is with coordinate velocity , (the strict inequality is the timelike branch). Then the coordinate velocity of in the chart is given by and , the denominators being positive; moreover when , and exactly when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two inertial frames of the affine Minkowski model with bases related by the boost above with parameter , , , , and their charts , (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model); the transition formulas displayed in the Statement (Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition).
The chart transition is with constant (Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition). In the ordered basis the passive boost with parameter acts on coordinates by , , , ; it is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse the boost with parameter , and with equality exactly for (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta), Linear and affine Lorentz maps, and the Lorentz group).
A vector has , and since the frame's first vector is future the component criterion holds: is future timelike if and only if (The timelike set has exactly two convex components, described in orthonormal coordinates, Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space, Time orientation, future and past timelike/null/causal vectors, and the closed cones).
For , is the Euclidean norm of the spatial part of in the frame (The Euclidean spatial structure and cross product of an inertial frame).
If is a future timelike worldline with proper-time function , then for parameter values one has (Proper time along a future timelike worldline, Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space).
Algebra of derivatives of real functions of a real parameter: finite sums and constant multiples are differentiable with derivatives given by the same sums and multiples; products and quotients obey the product and quotient rules wherever the denominator is nonzero. For inputs these formulas have continuous derivatives (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set). The mean value theorem applies to each compact parameter segment of the time function (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
Proof
Set , so . The inertial-chart transition is , and its inverse is . Thus , , and for . Translations disappear from coordinate differences and derivatives. A curve has tangent with its coordinate-derivative components, and [F2] gives the future timelike criterion.
Clock rate (i): the curve is with coordinate derivative , so its tangent at every is , whose components satisfy ; by step 1.1 the tangent is future timelike at every parameter value, so is a future timelike worldline. Its integrand is constant, , so and [F4] gives . Along the coordinate time of is , so , and the coordinate velocity of is because and .
For , put . At equal -time their separation is . Inverting the affine transition of step 1.1 shows that the event on at has , so both worldlines intersect each -time slice exactly once. For these two events , and ; the transition therefore gives and , proving rest distance by [F3]. For clause (c), take -rest worldlines with spatial separation . The time difference between their selected events is fixed by , hence and , with . Equal times of the two frames select different pairs unless .
Simultaneity (iii): if and , then applying the transition of step 1.1 componentwise gives , since is affine in with the displayed linear part; this is nonzero exactly when because .
Let have coordinates with and . The affine transition gives , and for . Thus has derivative , because . The mean value theorem makes strictly increasing. Locally its positive continuous derivative is bounded below, so the same theorem gives a continuous inverse; dividing difference quotients by proves , including one-sided endpoints. Now and for . Division gives exactly the displayed velocity formulas, with positive denominators.
Subluminality of the transformed velocity: squaring the formulas of step 2.4 and multiplying by the positive factor gives , where and ; expanding and using this equals . Hence , so with and both numerator factors are positive, and therefore ; conversely if the right-hand side vanishes and then , which is the asserted equality case.
Conclusion: step 2.1 establishes (i) together with the equivalent rate ; step 2.2 establishes (ii)(a), (ii)(b) and (ii)(c) with the indicated pairs of events; step 2.3 establishes (iii); steps 2.4 and 3.1 establish (iv), including the positivity of the denominators, and the equality case . This proves all four clauses of the Statement.
Remarks
-
The two computations use different hypotheses. Clause (i) is the proper-time computation along a straight worldline with coordinate velocity ; clause (iv) is the chain-rule computation along an arbitrary worldline with subluminal coordinate velocity. Clause (iv) does not assume that is straight, and clause (ii) makes no assertion about .
-
The subluminality identity. The identity proved in step 3.1, , is the coordinate form of the Lorentz invariance of the causal classification: the one-parameter factor in the numerator is linear in , not quadratic, as one checks at , where and both sides must equal .
-
Alignment matters. The factor in (ii) applies to separation along the first spatial direction of the boost. More generally, -rest worldlines with fixed spatial displacement have displacement at equal -times: forces , and substitution in the affine transition gives the formula. In particular, a purely transverse separation retains its length.
Depends on
The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta
The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta)
Linear and affine Lorentz maps, and the Lorentz group
Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model
Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition
Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space
Proper time along a future timelike worldline
Norms of four-velocity and four-acceleration, and the observer rest-space decomposition
The Euclidean spatial structure and cross product of an inertial frame
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set
Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space
The timelike set has exactly two convex components, described in orthonormal coordinates
Time orientation, future and past timelike/null/causal vectors, and the closed cones
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- B. Crowell, Special Relativity, revision 2020-12-10 (author-published undergraduate textbook, 246 PDF pages): Sections 1.1-1.3 pp. 12-28 (vector representation of observer motion, operational radar calibration, time dilation, length-contraction road-trip example), Sections 3.5 and 3.7 pp. 60-68 (four-velocity, acceleration, projection operator), Section 3.9.3 pp. 73-74 (local failure of accelerated simultaneity), Sections 7.1-7.3 pp. 147-151 (Rindler coordinates and nonuniform proper acceleration), Section 8.1 pp. 165-169 (rotating synchronization), Section 9.5 pp. 205-211 (congruences, expansion, Born rigidity); signature (+---) converted to (-+++) and c = 1 formulas converted to x^0 = c t
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997): Chapter 1 pp. 8-16 (inertial frames built from rigid rods and synchronized clocks, simultaneity, time dilation, length contraction) and pp. 26-27 (worldline, proper time (1.97)-(1.99), four-velocity); Chapter 3 pp. 68-71 (proper-time functional)
- H. S. Reall, Mathematical Tripos Part III General Relativity (Cambridge, October 12, 2022 revision): Sections 2.2-2.3 pp. 27-30 (Minkowski metric, causal classification, timelike proper time, observer measurements in an inertial chart, radar coordinates); Internet Archive copy of the original https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/hsr1000/part3_gr_lectures.pdf