Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coordinate formulas of a boost: clock rates, rod lengths, simultaneity and velocity transformation

Statement

Let (o;e0,e1,e2,e3) and (o′;e0′,e1′,e2′,e3′) be inertial frames whose bases are related by a boost along the common first spatial direction with parameter v, ∣v∣<c:

e0′=γ(e0+vce1),e1′=γ(e1+vce0),e2′=e2,e3′=e3,

where γ=(1−v2/c2)−1/2, with charts x, x′ (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition). For arbitrary origins put b:=−B(v/c)x(o′), the constant translation vector, and write the affine transition as

x′0=γ(x0−vcx1)+b0,x′1=γ(x1−vcx0)+b1,x′2=x2+b2,x′3=x3+b3.

Then:

(i) Clock rate. The straight worldline y(λ):=x−1(λ,vcλ+a1,a2,a3) (coordinate velocity (v,0,0), the worldline of a clock at rest in the frame x′) is future timelike, and the elapsed proper time between λ0<λ1 is (λ1−λ0)/(cγ); equivalently dτ/dt=1/γ along y, where t is the coordinate time of x.

(ii) Length comparison. For L0>0 let ya,yb be the two straight worldlines at rest in the frame x′ through the events with x′-coordinates (λ,0,0,0) and (λ,L0,0,0). Then (a) at equal x′-times their x′-coordinate separation is L0, while (b) at equal x-times their x-coordinate separation is L0/γ, so the measuring frame x assigns the length L0/γ to a rod of rest length L0 at rest in x′; (c) symmetrically, for two worldlines at rest in x with constant x-spatial separation (L0,0,0) along the boost direction, the separation at equal x′-times is L0/γ. In each case the comparison uses events at equal time in the measuring frame; comparing equal times of the other frame is a different pair of events.

(iii) Simultaneity. If x0(q)−x0(p)=0 and x1(q)−x1(p)=L, then x′0(q)−x′0(p)=−γvcL; in particular simultaneity in the chart x is not simultaneity in the chart x′ whenever vL≠0.

(iv) Velocity transformation. Let y:J→A be a C1 future causal curve which in the chart x is t↦(ct,r(t)) with coordinate velocity w(t):=r′(t)∈R3, ∣w(t)∣≤c (the strict inequality is the timelike branch). Then the coordinate velocity w′ of y in the chart x′ is given by w1′=(w1−v)/(1−vw1/c2) and w⊥′=w⊥/(γ(1−vw1/c2)), the denominators being positive; moreover ∣w′∣<c when ∣w∣<c, and ∣w′∣=c exactly when ∣w∣=c.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two inertial frames of the affine Minkowski model with bases related by the boost above with parameter v, ∣v∣<c, c>0, γ=(1−v2/c2)−1/2, and their charts x, x′ (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model); the transition formulas displayed in the Statement (Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition).

[F1]

The chart transition is x′=B(β)x+b with constant b (Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition). In the ordered basis (e0,e1,e2,e3) the passive boost with parameter β acts on coordinates by x′0=γ(x0−βx1), x′1=γ(x1−βx0), x′2=x2, x′3=x3; it is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse the boost with parameter −β, and γ≥1 with equality exactly for β=0 (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta), Linear and affine Lorentz maps, and the Lorentz group).

[F2]

A vector u=u0e0+u1e1+u2e2+u3e3 has η(u,u)=−(u0)2+(u1)2+(u2)2+(u3)2, and since the frame's first vector e0 is future the component criterion holds: u is future timelike if and only if u0>(u1)2+(u2)2+(u3)2 (The timelike set has exactly two convex components, described in orthonormal coordinates, Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space, Time orientation, future and past timelike/null/causal vectors, and the closed cones).

[F3]

For w=w1e1+w2e2+w3e3, ∣w∣:=(w1)2+(w2)2+(w3)2 is the Euclidean norm of the spatial part of w in the frame (The Euclidean spatial structure and cross product of an inertial frame).

[F4]

If y is a C1 future timelike worldline with proper-time function τ, then for parameter values a<b one has τ(b)−τ(a)=c−1∫ab−η(y′,y′) ds (Proper time along a future timelike worldline, Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3

Set β:=v/c, so ∣β∣<1. The inertial-chart transition is x′=B(β)x+b, and its inverse is x=B(−β)(x′−b). Thus x0=γ(x′0−b0+β(x′1−b1)), x1=γ(x′1−b1+β(x′0−b0)), and xj=x′j−bj for j=2,3. Translations disappear from coordinate differences and derivatives. A curve has tangent with its coordinate-derivative components, and [F2] gives the future timelike criterion.

2.1F1F4step 1.1

Clock rate (i): the curve y(λ)=x−1(λ,βλ+a1,a2,a3) is C1 with coordinate derivative (1,β,0,0), so its tangent at every λ is e0+βe1, whose components (1,β,0,0) satisfy 1>∣β∣; by step 1.1 the tangent is future timelike at every parameter value, so y is a future timelike worldline. Its integrand is constant, −η(y′,y′)=1−β2=1/γ2, so −η(y′,y′)=1/γ and [F4] gives τ(λ1)−τ(λ0)=c−1∫λ0λ1(1/γ) dλ=(λ1−λ0)/(cγ). Along y the coordinate time of x is t=x0/c=λ/c, so dτ/dt=c dτ/dλ=c/(cγ)=1/γ, and the coordinate velocity of y is dr/dt=(dx1/dt,dx2/dt,dx3/dt)=(v,0,0) because dx1/dλ=β and λ=ct.

2.2F3step 1.1

For s=0,L0, put ys(λ):=(x′)−1(λ,s,0,0). At equal x′-time their separation is (L0,0,0). Inverting the affine transition of step 1.1 shows that the event on ys at x0=T has λ=T/γ+b0−β(s−b1), so both worldlines intersect each x-time slice exactly once. For these two events Δx0=0, Δx′1=L0 and Δx′2=Δx′3=0; the transition therefore gives L0=γΔx1 and Δx2=Δx3=0, proving rest distance L0/γ by [F3]. For clause (c), take x-rest worldlines with spatial separation (L0,0,0). The time difference between their selected events is fixed by 0=Δx′0=γ(Δx0−βL0), hence Δx0=βL0 and Δx′1=γ(L0−β2L0)=L0/γ, with Δx′2=Δx′3=0. Equal times of the two frames select different pairs unless βL0=0.

2.3step 1.1

Simultaneity (iii): if x0(q)−x0(p)=0 and x1(q)−x1(p)=L, then applying the transition of step 1.1 componentwise gives x′0(q)−x′0(p)=γ(0−βL)=−γvcL, since x′ is affine in x with the displayed linear part; this is nonzero exactly when vL≠0 because γ>0.

2.4F1F6step 1.1

Let y(t) have coordinates (ct,r(t)) with w=r′ and ∣w∣≤c. The affine transition gives x′0(t)=γ(ct−βr1(t))+b0, x′1(t)=γ(r1(t)−βct)+b1 and x′j(t)=rj(t)+bj for j=2,3. Thus t′:=x′0/c has derivative dt′/dt=γ(c−βw1)/c=γ(1−vw1/c2)>0, because ∣vw1∣/c2≤∣v∣/c<1. The mean value theorem makes t′ strictly increasing. Locally its positive continuous derivative is bounded below, so the same theorem gives a continuous inverse; dividing difference quotients by (t′(t+h)−t′(t))/h proves dr′/dt′=(dr′/dt)/(dt′/dt), including one-sided endpoints. Now dx′1/dt=γ(w1−v) and dx′j/dt=wj for j=2,3. Division gives exactly the displayed velocity formulas, with positive denominators.

3.1step 2.4

Subluminality of the transformed velocity: squaring the formulas of step 2.4 and multiplying by the positive factor (1−vw1c2)2 gives (1−vw1c2)2(c2−∣w′∣2)=c2(1−vw1c2)2−(w1−v)2−∣w⊥∣2(1−v2c2), where ∣w⊥∣2=w22+w32 and 1/γ2=1−v2/c2; expanding and using ∣w∣2=w12+∣w⊥∣2 this equals (c2−∣w∣2)(1−v2c2). Hence c2−∣w′∣2=(c2−∣w∣2)(1−v2c2)/(1−vw1c2)2, so with ∣w∣<c and ∣v∣<c both numerator factors are positive, ∣w′∣2<c2 and therefore ∣w′∣<c; conversely if ∣w∣=c the right-hand side vanishes and then ∣w′∣=c, which is the asserted equality case.

4.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1∎

Conclusion: step 2.1 establishes (i) together with the equivalent rate dτ/dt=1/γ; step 2.2 establishes (ii)(a), (ii)(b) and (ii)(c) with the indicated pairs of events; step 2.3 establishes (iii); steps 2.4 and 3.1 establish (iv), including the positivity of the denominators, ∣w′∣<c and the equality case ∣w′∣=c⇔∣w∣=c. This proves all four clauses of the Statement.

Remarks

  • The two computations use different hypotheses. Clause (i) is the proper-time computation along a straight worldline with coordinate velocity (v,0,0); clause (iv) is the chain-rule computation along an arbitrary C1 worldline with subluminal coordinate velocity. Clause (iv) does not assume that y is straight, and clause (ii) makes no assertion about y.

  • The subluminality identity. The identity proved in step 3.1, c2−∣w′∣2=(c2−∣w∣2)(1−v2/c2)/(1−vw1/c2)2, is the coordinate form of the Lorentz invariance of the causal classification: the one-parameter factor in the numerator is linear in (1−v2/c2), not quadratic, as one checks at w=0, where ∣w′∣=∣v∣ and both sides must equal c2−v2.

  • Alignment matters. The factor 1/γ in (ii) applies to separation along the first spatial direction of the boost. More generally, x-rest worldlines with fixed spatial displacement (ℓ1,ℓ2,ℓ3) have displacement (ℓ1/γ,ℓ2,ℓ3) at equal x′-times: Δx′0=0 forces Δx0=βℓ1, and substitution in the affine transition gives the formula. In particular, a purely transverse separation retains its length.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources