How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Worked transverse Doppler protocols at beta = 3/5
Worked comparison of the two transverse Doppler protocols of the ideal plane-wave model at relative speed (3/5)c: gamma in the frame where the wave is transverse to the motion and 1/gamma in the frame where it is transverse in the observer frame. Conditional on the model; no measurement, statistical inference or empirical claim.
Example
Worked example in the model of sr-light-and-doppler, on the page sr-light-and-doppler-examples, showing that the transverse Doppler shift depends on the frame in which transversality is required. Let and be inertial charts with , and , and let an ideal plane wave have frame- data with .
(a) If , so and the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in , then Doppler shift and aberration for an ideal plane wave between inertial descriptions gives and , which has ; the frequency read by the -rest observer is blue-shifted by the factor .
(b) If , so and equivalently , the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in , and the theorem gives and ; the frequency read by the -rest observer is red-shifted by the factor .
In neither case is for the nonzero , and the two exact factors differ; a statement of a transverse Doppler shift is therefore incomplete until the frame in which the direction is transverse is specified. Scope: a conditional computation in the ideal plane-wave model; no measurement and no empirical claim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Inertial charts with , ; an ideal plane wave with frame- data , , .
Adopted ideal plane-wave model: one ideal monochromatic plane wave with future null wave covector; the rest observers of and read the frequencies and (Adopted ideal plane-wave and frequency-reading model, Null wave covectors, frame frequency data and the observer frequency of an ideal plane wave).
For the chart pair of the Given the theorem gives with , and in the axis case the direction formulas , , (Doppler shift and aberration for an ideal plane wave between inertial descriptions, clause (i)).
Transverse protocols of the theorem: if then and this is greater than when ; if , equivalently for , then , which is less than when (Doppler shift and aberration for an ideal plane wave between inertial descriptions, clause (iv)).
Verification
Case (a). Here has and , so the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in , and [L2] gives , which is greater than because by [L3]; the axis formulas of [L1] with , , , give , and , and .
Case (b). Here has and ; by [L2] this is equivalent to with , the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in , and , which is less than ; the axis formulas of [L1] give , , , so .
Conclusion. In case (a) the shift is by , in case (b) by ; both configurations are called transverse because the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in one of the two frames, and the two factors are different and neither is for the stated nonzero . Hence a transverse Doppler statement is incomplete until the frame in which transversality holds is specified. The computation is conditional on the ideal plane-wave model and makes no measurement or empirical claim; no choice principle is used.
Depends on
Doppler shift and aberration for an ideal plane wave between inertial descriptions
Null wave covectors, frame frequency data and the observer frequency of an ideal plane wave
Adopted ideal plane-wave and frequency-reading model
Boost transformation of a future null wave covector and of its frame data
The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- B. Crowell, Special Relativity, revision 2020-12-10 (author-published undergraduate textbook, 246 PDF pages): Section 3.2 pp. 55-57 and Section 6.5.1 p. 137; signature (+---) converted to (-+++) and c = 1 formulas converted to x^0 = c t
- S. Murugesh, Relativity - Special Theory (IIST course notes PH33003/PH43017, last update 2009-02-18, 31 PDF pages): Chapter 6 Waves pp. 25-28, transverse Doppler effect (6.1.2) p. 27