Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Worked transverse Doppler protocols at beta = 3/5

Physical scope

Worked comparison of the two transverse Doppler protocols of the ideal plane-wave model at relative speed (3/5)c: gamma in the frame where the wave is transverse to the motion and 1/gamma in the frame where it is transverse in the observer frame. Conditional on the model; no measurement, statistical inference or empirical claim.

Example

Worked example in the model of sr-light-and-doppler, on the page sr-light-and-doppler-examples, showing that the transverse Doppler shift depends on the frame in which transversality is required. Let x and x′ be inertial charts with x′=B(β)x+b, β=(3/5)e1 and γ=5/4, and let an ideal plane wave have frame-x data (ω,s) with ω>0.

(a) If s=e2, so β⋅s=0 and the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in x, then Doppler shift and aberration for an ideal plane wave between inertial descriptions gives ω′=γω=(5/4)ω>ω and s′=(−3/5,4/5,0), which has ∣s′∣=1; the frequency read by the x′-rest observer is blue-shifted by the factor 5/4.

(b) If s=(3/5,4/5,0), so β⋅s=9/25=∣β∣2 and equivalently s′⋅e1=0, the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in x′, and the theorem gives ω′=γ(1−9/25)ω=(5/4)(16/25)ω=(4/5)ω=ω/γ<ω and s′=e2; the frequency read by the x′-rest observer is red-shifted by the factor 4/5.

In neither case is ω′=ω for the nonzero β, and the two exact factors differ; a statement of a transverse Doppler shift is therefore incomplete until the frame in which the direction is transverse is specified. Scope: a conditional computation in the ideal plane-wave model; no measurement and no empirical claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Inertial charts x,x′ with x′=B(β)x+b, β=(3/5)e1; an ideal plane wave with frame-x data (ω,s), ω>0, ∣s∣=1.

[A1]

Adopted ideal plane-wave model: one ideal monochromatic plane wave with future null wave covector; the rest observers of x and x′ read the frequencies ω and ω′ (Adopted ideal plane-wave and frequency-reading model, Null wave covectors, frame frequency data and the observer frequency of an ideal plane wave).

[L1]

For the chart pair of the Given the theorem gives ω′=γ(1−β⋅s)ω>0 with γ=(1−∣β∣2)−1/2, and in the axis case β=be1 the direction formulas s1′=(s1−b)/(1−bs1), s2′=s2/[γ(1−bs1)], s3′=s3/[γ(1−bs1)] (Doppler shift and aberration for an ideal plane wave between inertial descriptions, clause (i)).

[L2]

Transverse protocols of the theorem: if β⋅s=0 then ω′=γω and this is greater than ω when β≠0; if β⋅s=∣β∣2, equivalently s′⋅βhat=0 for β≠0, then ω′=ω/γ, which is less than ω when β≠0 (Doppler shift and aberration for an ideal plane wave between inertial descriptions, clause (iv)).

[L3]

γ=(1−∣β∣2)−1/2, so for β=(3/5)e1: γ=(16/25)−1/2=5/4, and ∣β∣2=9/25 (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, Boost transformation of a future null wave covector and of its frame data).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1A1L1L2L3

Case (a). Here s=e2 has ∣s∣=1 and β⋅s=(3/5)(0)=0, so the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in x, and [L2] gives ω′=γω=(5/4)ω, which is greater than ω because γ=5/4>1 by [L3]; the axis formulas of [L1] with b=3/5, s1=0, s2=1, s3=0 give s1′=(0−3/5)/(1−0)=−3/5, s2′=1/[(5/4)(1−0)]=4/5 and s3′=0, and ∣s′∣2=9/25+16/25=1.

1.2A1L1L2L3

Case (b). Here s=(3/5,4/5,0) has ∣s∣2=9/25+16/25=1 and β⋅s=(3/5)(3/5)=9/25=∣β∣2; by [L2] this is equivalent to s′⋅βhat=0 with βhat=e1, the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in x′, and ω′=γ(1−9/25)ω=(5/4)(16/25)ω=(4/5)ω=ω/γ, which is less than ω; the axis formulas of [L1] give s1′=(3/5−3/5)/(1−9/25)=0, s2′=(4/5)/[(5/4)(16/25)]=(4/5)/(4/5)=1, s3′=0, so s′=e2.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Conclusion. In case (a) the shift is by 5/4, in case (b) by 4/5; both configurations are called transverse because the propagation direction is perpendicular to the relative velocity in one of the two frames, and the two factors are different and neither is 1 for the stated nonzero β. Hence a transverse Doppler statement is incomplete until the frame in which transversality holds is specified. The computation is conditional on the ideal plane-wave model and makes no measurement or empirical claim; no choice principle is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources