Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonuniform insulated temperature profile relaxes to its mean

Physical scope

An exact initial-profile example inside the constant-capacity, constant-conductivity insulated rectangular model; it is a conditional calculation, not an observation.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice as in Constant-conductivity heat evolution on an insulated rectangle. Let Li>0 be lengths in metres and Ω=∏i=13(0,Li). Let c>0 be a constant volumetric heat capacity in J m−3 K−1, k>0 a constant scalar conductivity in W m−1 K−1, and u⋆ an arbitrary reference energy density in J m−3, with u(θ)=u⋆+cθ as in Constant-conductivity heat evolution on an insulated rectangle. Let Tb and ϵ be temperatures in kelvins with Tb>ϵ/30>0. For r∈[0,1] set h(r)=r2(1−r)2−1/30 and prescribe g(x)=Tb+ϵh(x1/L1)(x∈Ω‾). Use its even 2Li-periodic extension in each coordinate as the initial datum on R3. The unique insulated heat solution has constant spatial mean Tb and satisfies ∫Ω∣T(x,t)−Tb∣2 dx≤ϵ2∣Ω∣2100e−2(k/c)t/CΩ,CΩ=32max⁡iLi2. This gives an exactly computed initial variance and the conditional relaxation estimate of the model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; lengths Li in metres; c,k,u⋆,Tb,ϵ with the units and hypotheses in the Statement; the profile h(r)=r2(1−r)2−1/30; and the field g(x)=Tb+ϵh(x1/L1).

[A1]

Countable Choice is the explicit hypothesis used by the heat-evolution supplier The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

[F1]

Constant-conductivity heat evolution on an insulated rectangle: the even-periodic compatible initial field has the unique Gaussian-convolution heat solution with positive bounds and homogeneous Neumann faces.

[F2]

Exponential relaxation of the constant-conductivity Neumann heat model: for this solution, the mean is conserved and E(t)≤e−2(k/c)t/CΩE(0).

Example

The function h is dimensionless, and g has units of kelvins. The extension uses even reflection at each face and period 2Li; the initial field is nonconstant but compatible with insulated walls.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Write q(r)=r2(1−r)2. Then q′(r)=2r(1−r)(1−2r), so q′(0)=q′(1)=0, and q′′(0)=q′′(1)=2. Also 0≤q≤1/16 on [0,1]. The constant and first two derivatives therefore match across the even-reflection and periodic seams; the extension is C2, with bounded uniformly continuous derivatives. Since h=q−1/30, its values lie in [−1/30,7/240], so g≥Tb−ϵ/30>0.

1.2givenalgebra

Expand q(r)=r2−2r3+r4, so ∫01q(r) dr=1/3−1/2+1/5=1/30. Also q(r)2=r4−4r5+6r6−4r7+r8, whence ∫01q(r)2 dr=15−46+67−48+19=1630. Therefore ∫01h(r) dr=0 and ∫01h(r)2 dr=∫01(q−1/30)2 dr=1630−1900=12100. Integrating over the other two coordinates now gives g‾=Tb and E(0)=ϵ2L2L3L1/2100=ϵ2∣Ω∣/2100.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2∎

The profile satisfies every initial-data hypothesis of [F1]; its vanishing normal derivative follows from q′(0)=q′(1)=0. Apply [F1] for existence and [F2] with the computed E(0) to obtain the stated conserved mean and decay bound. This is a deduction within the adopted continuum model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources